B Sue Zager1, Margaret Yancy. 1. Northern Arizona Veterans Administration Health Care System, Geriatric Extended Care, Prescott, AZ 86313, USA. bzager@asu.edu
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The Patient Self Determination Act of 1990 mandates healthcare providers (HCP) to speak with patients about end-of-life preferences and advance directives (AD). HCP work with patients of varying cultures, and standard ADs do not address cultural differences. In order to understand various cultural beliefs, cultural sensitivity is important especially when discussing advance care planning (ACP). AIMS: Individuals from differing ethnic backgrounds are likely to turn to their traditional norms of practice when ill or treatment choices must be made. An AD that addresses varying cultural values and beliefs was sought. METHODS: A comprehensive review of the literature was conducted. Articles selected for review included qualitative and quantitative studies. The evidence was evaluated and synthesized for information related to cultural sensitivity and ADs. FINDINGS: Three common themes emerged related to ACP discussions and culture. Healthcare provider awareness, communication, and education concerning cultural differences and ACP assisted in meeting the needs for end-of-life planning in the current era of increased globalization. Education for HCP on cultural differences and how to lead discussions promoted ACP. IMPLICATION FOR PRACTICE: ADs are an essential part of health care and promote patient-centered care. (HCP) should be able to recognize differing cultural values and beliefs in order to initiate conversations about end of life. Initiating conversations about ACP can be facilitated by using open-ended questions that respect the values and beliefs of various cultures.
BACKGROUND: The Patient Self Determination Act of 1990 mandates healthcare providers (HCP) to speak with patients about end-of-life preferences and advance directives (AD). HCP work with patients of varying cultures, and standard ADs do not address cultural differences. In order to understand various cultural beliefs, cultural sensitivity is important especially when discussing advance care planning (ACP). AIMS: Individuals from differing ethnic backgrounds are likely to turn to their traditional norms of practice when ill or treatment choices must be made. An AD that addresses varying cultural values and beliefs was sought. METHODS: A comprehensive review of the literature was conducted. Articles selected for review included qualitative and quantitative studies. The evidence was evaluated and synthesized for information related to cultural sensitivity and ADs. FINDINGS: Three common themes emerged related to ACP discussions and culture. Healthcare provider awareness, communication, and education concerning cultural differences and ACP assisted in meeting the needs for end-of-life planning in the current era of increased globalization. Education for HCP on cultural differences and how to lead discussions promoted ACP. IMPLICATION FOR PRACTICE: ADs are an essential part of health care and promote patient-centered care. (HCP) should be able to recognize differing cultural values and beliefs in order to initiate conversations about end of life. Initiating conversations about ACP can be facilitated by using open-ended questions that respect the values and beliefs of various cultures.
Authors: Katharine E Duckworth; Allison M Forti; Gregory B Russell; Seema Naik; David Hurd; Richard P McQuellon Journal: Am J Hosp Palliat Care Date: 2013-08-13 Impact factor: 2.500
Authors: Guillermo Salinas-Escudero; María Fernanda Carrillo-Vega; Carmen García-Peña; Silvia Martínez-Valverde; Luis David Jácome-Maldonado; Matteo Cesari; Mario Ulises Pérez-Zepeda Journal: J Appl Gerontol Date: 2021-06-28
Authors: Diah Martina; Olaf P Geerse; Cheng-Pei Lin; Martina S Kristanti; Wichor M Bramer; Masanori Mori; Ida J Korfage; Agnes van der Heide; Judith Ac Rietjens; Carin Cd van der Rijt Journal: Palliat Med Date: 2021-09-06 Impact factor: 4.762
Authors: Caroline Moeller Arnfeldt; Mogens Groenvold; Anna Thit Johnsen; Branka Červ; Luc Deliens; Lesley Dunleavy; Agnes van der Heide; Marijke C Kars; Urška Lunder; Guido Miccinesi; Kristian Pollock; Judith A C Rietjens; Jane Seymour Journal: PLoS One Date: 2022-07-28 Impact factor: 3.752
Authors: Cheng-Pei Lin; Catherine J Evans; Jonathan Koffman; Jo Armes; Fliss E M Murtagh; Richard Harding Journal: Palliat Med Date: 2018-10-26 Impact factor: 4.762
Authors: Chiu-Hsien Yang; Chien-Yi Wu; Joseph T S Low; Yun-Shiuan Chuang; Yu-Wen Huang; Shang-Jyh Hwang; Ping-Jen Chen Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-08-02 Impact factor: 3.390