| Literature DB >> 21668665 |
Parvaiz A Koul1, Muneer A Mir, Nargis K Bali, Mamta Chawla-Sarkar, Mehuli Sarkar, Samander Kaushik, U H Khan, Feroze Ahmad, Rebecca Garten, Renu B Lal, Shobha Broor.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: With the emergence of pandemic influenza A (2009A/H1N1) virus in India, we sought to determine the prevalence and clinical presentations of seasonal and pandemic influenza viruses among acute respiratory illness (ARI) patients from Srinagar, a temperate climate area in northern India, during the peak winter season.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2011 PMID: 21668665 PMCID: PMC5780669 DOI: 10.1111/j.1750-2659.2011.00261.x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Influenza Other Respir Viruses ISSN: 1750-2640 Impact factor: 4.380
Figure 1Week‐wise prevalence of seasonal, 2009A/H1N1, and influenza B at a tertiary care hospital, Sheri‐Kashmir Institute of Medical Sciences, Srinagar, India from January 1 to March 14, 2010 (week 53 of 2009 to week 10 of 2010).
Demographic and clinical presentations of patients with 2009A/H1N1 infection in Kashmir, India
| Pt ID | Age/Sex | In/Outpatient | Symptoms | Comorbidity | Isolate Name | Segment Id |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 42 | 75/M | IP | F,C,E,SOB,ST | COPD,CHF | A/India‐Srinagar/3/2010 H1N1 |
|
| 3 | 65/F | IP | F,R,CH,ND,C,E,SOB, D,H | COPD | A/India‐Srinagar/2/2010 H1N1 |
|
| 55 | 65/M | IP | F,ND,C,SOBSOB,H, V | GI Malignancy | A/India‐Srinagar/4/2010 H1N1 |
|
| 101 | 55/M | OP | F,R,CH,ND,CSOB,H | _ | – | – |
| 10 | 44/M | OP | F,R, CH,ND,SOB | – | – | – |
| 59* | 40/M | OP | ND, C,E,SOB,SOB,H | _ | A/India‐Srinagar/8/2010 H1N1 |
|
| 36* | 39/M | OP | F,R,CH,ND, C,E,,SOB, ST,V | Asthma, Post TB fibrosis | A/India‐Srinagar/1/2010 H1N1 |
|
| 13* | 28/M | OP | F,R,CH,ND, C,SOB, ST, H | – | – | – |
| 33* | 28/M | OP | F,R,CH,ND, C,ESOB, ST | – | A/India‐Srinagar/6/2010 H1N1 |
|
| 73* | 25/M | OP | F,R,CH,ND,C,H | – | A/India‐Srinagar/7/2010 H1N1 |
|
| 53* | 23/F | IP | F,C,E, SOB,ST | – | – | – |
| 20 | 20/M | OP | F,R,ND,C, E, ST, C,E,H | ABPA/Asthma | A/India‐Srinagar/5/2010 H1N1 |
|
| 155* | 15/F | IP | F,R,CH,ND, C,SOB,ST,H | Multiple Myeloma | – | – |
F, Fever; R, Rigors; CH, Chills; ND, Nasal discharge; C, Cough; E, Expectoration; SOB, Shortness of breath; ST, Sore Throat; D, Diarrhea; V, Vomiting; H, Headache; COPD, Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; ABPA, Allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis; CHF, Congestive heart failure, TB, Tuberculosis. *denotes patients having a history of contact with another case of acute respiratory illness in past 7 days at home/workplace.
Comparison of clinical symptoms among influenza‐positive and influenza‐negative cases in Kashmir, India
| Clinical feature | Influenza negative
| Influenza positive
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Contact in last 7 days | 64 (37) | 14 (67) | 0·009 |
| Nasal discharge on examination | 44 (25) | 13 (62) | 0·0005 |
| Fever | 136 (79) | 17 (81) | 0·80 |
| Chills | 113 (65) | 17(81) | 0·15 |
| Rigors | 36 (21) | 7 (33) | 0·19 |
| Cough | 141 (82) | 18 (86) | 0·63 |
| Sputum production | 101 (58) | 13 (62) | 0·76 |
| Sore throat | 57 (33) | 8 (38) | 0·64 |
| Nasal discharge | 103 (60) | 16 (76) | 0·14 |
| Nasal stuffiness | 81 (47) | 14 (67) | 0·08 |
| Body ache | 115 (67) | 12 (57) | 0·39 |
| Malaise | 40 (23) | 5 (24) | 1·00 |
| Vomiting | 25 (14) | 3 (14) | 1·00 |
| Breathlessness | 96 (56) | 15 (71) | 0·16 |
| Current smoker | 59 (34) | 5 (24) | 0·34 |
| Respiratory cases at home | 37 (21) | 7 (33) | 0·21 |
| Underlying OAD | 45 (26) | 6 (29) | 0·80 |
| Cyanosis | 41 (24) | 2 (10) | 0·17 |
| Accessory muscle usage | 52 (30) | 11(52) | 0·04 |
| Crepitations | 68 (39) | 8 (38) | 0·91 |
| Rhonchi/Wheeze | 48 (28) | 6 (29) | 0·94 |
| Hepatomegaly | 16 (9) | 2(10) | 1·00 |
| Pneumonia/Infiltrates on radiograph | 53 (31) | 9 (43) | 0·25 |
| Duration of symptoms (mean days, range) | 5·31 + 2·91 (1–15) | 4·81 ± | 0·67 |
Figure 2Phylogenetic analysis of HA1 region of the HA gene of pandemic 2009A/H1N1 strains isolated from Srinagar, India. The representative strains from 2009/A/California/H1N1 strain and the 2010 vaccine strain A/California/7/2009, India, and from other parts of the world were used to generate the phylogenetic tree using neighbor‐joining method.