AIMS: The aim of study was to evaluate the impact of CRTC1-MAML2 and CRTC3-MAML2 fusions on the histological classification of mucoepidermoid carcinoma (MEC) of the salivary glands and on the prognosis of patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: MEC cases (n = 111) were screened for CRTC1-MAML2 and CRTC3-MAML2 fusions by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction. We developed a system of 'molecular Armed Forces Institute of Pathology (AFIP) classification' that combined the AFIP histological classification proposed by Goode et al. and the presence of CRTC1-MAML2 or CRTC3-MAML2 fusions. MEC cases positive for CRTC1-MAML2 or CRTC3-MAML2 fusion formed a favourable tumour subset that was distinct from fusion-negative cases. When positive for the fusions, 'high-risk' patients, including those with a higher histological grade or an advanced clinical stage, showed an excellent prognosis. For overall survival, 'molecular AFIP classification' was selected as a powerful independent prognostic factor (P=0.0038), as was the clinical stage (P =0.0032). For disease-free survival, 'molecular AFIP classification' was also selected as an independent prognostic factor (P = 0.0006). CONCLUSIONS: Molecular AFIP classification may be useful in predicting the prognosis of patients with MEC.
AIMS: The aim of study was to evaluate the impact of CRTC1-MAML2 and CRTC3-MAML2 fusions on the histological classification of mucoepidermoid carcinoma (MEC) of the salivary glands and on the prognosis of patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: MEC cases (n = 111) were screened for CRTC1-MAML2 and CRTC3-MAML2 fusions by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction. We developed a system of 'molecular Armed Forces Institute of Pathology (AFIP) classification' that combined the AFIP histological classification proposed by Goode et al. and the presence of CRTC1-MAML2 or CRTC3-MAML2 fusions. MEC cases positive for CRTC1-MAML2 or CRTC3-MAML2 fusion formed a favourable tumour subset that was distinct from fusion-negative cases. When positive for the fusions, 'high-risk' patients, including those with a higher histological grade or an advanced clinical stage, showed an excellent prognosis. For overall survival, 'molecular AFIP classification' was selected as a powerful independent prognostic factor (P=0.0038), as was the clinical stage (P =0.0032). For disease-free survival, 'molecular AFIP classification' was also selected as an independent prognostic factor (P = 0.0006). CONCLUSIONS: Molecular AFIP classification may be useful in predicting the prognosis of patients with MEC.
Authors: Nicole A Cipriani; Jonathan J Lusardi; James McElherne; Alexander T Pearson; Andrea D Olivas; Carrie Fitzpatrick; Mark W Lingen; Elizabeth A Blair Journal: Am J Surg Pathol Date: 2019-07 Impact factor: 6.394
Authors: Andrés Coca-Pelaz; Juan P Rodrigo; Asterios Triantafyllou; Jennifer L Hunt; Alessandra Rinaldo; Primož Strojan; Missak Haigentz; William M Mendenhall; Robert P Takes; Vincent Vander Poorten; Alfio Ferlito Journal: Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol Date: 2014-04-26 Impact factor: 2.503
Authors: Oliver Bissinger; Carolin Götz; Andreas Kolk; Henning A Bier; Abbas Agaimy; Henning Frenzel; Sven Perner; Julika Ribbat-Idel; Klaus Dietrich Wolff; Wilko Weichert; Caroline Mogler Journal: Rare Tumors Date: 2017-10-03