Literature DB >> 21667728

Custom endoprosthetic reconstruction for malignant bone disease in the humeral diaphysis.

Anthony McGrath1, Mathew D Sewell, Sammy A Hanna, Robin C Pollock, John A Skinner, Stephen R Cannon, Timothy W R Briggs.   

Abstract

The optimal reconstructive method following segmental resection of malignant tumours in the humeral diaphysis is unknown as there are no prospective long-term studies comparing biologic with endoprosthetic reconstruction. This is a retrospective review of 13 patients who, between 1995 and 2010, had undergone limb salvage at our institution using a custom-made humeral diaphyseal endoprosthetic replacement following excision of malignant bone disease. There were 9 males and 4 females with a mean age of 35 years at the time of surgery (range: 10 to 78). Mean follow-up was 56.8 months (range: 5 to 148). Cumulative patient survival was 75% at 10 years. Implant survival, with removal of the endoprosthesis or part of it for any reason as an end point, was 47% at 10 years. Seven patients required revision (54%). Complications included metastases in four, aseptic loosening in four, peri-prosthetic fracture in two and local recurrence in two. Mean MSTS and TESS scores were 23 (18 to 27) and 67% (52-80) respectively. Custom-made humeral diaphyseal replacement following resection of malignant bone tumours provided functional results superior to amputation, without an obvious compromise in patient survival. There was a relatively high revision rate for aseptic loosening and peri-prosthetic fracture and patients should be counselled about this preoperatively.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21667728

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Orthop Belg        ISSN: 0001-6462            Impact factor:   0.500


  7 in total

1.  CORR Insights(®): Outcomes of a Modular Intercalary Endoprosthesis as Treatment for Segmental Defects of the Femur, Tibia, and Humerus.

Authors:  Reinhard Windhager
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-11-19       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Outcomes of a Modular Intercalary Endoprosthesis as Treatment for Segmental Defects of the Femur, Tibia, and Humerus.

Authors:  Joseph Benevenia; Rainer Kirchner; Francis Patterson; Kathleen Beebe; Dieter C Wirtz; Steven Rivero; Mark Palma; Max J Friedrich
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Does total humeral endoprosthetic replacement provide reliable reconstruction with preservation of a useful extremity?

Authors:  Hazem Wafa; Krishna Reddy; Robert Grimer; Adesegun Abudu; Lee Jeys; Simon Carter; Roger Tillman
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  En bloc resection and intercalary prosthesis implantation for the treatment of humeral diaphyseal bone metastases.

Authors:  Feifei Pu; Zhicai Zhang; Baichuan Wang; Jianxiang Liu; Zengwu Shao
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2020-10-06       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Intercalary prosthetic replacement is a reliable solution for metastatic humeral shaft fractures: retrospective, observational study of a single center series.

Authors:  Zhiqing Zhao; Zhipeng Ye; Taiqiang Yan; Xiaodong Tang; Wei Guo; Rongli Yang
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-05-05       Impact factor: 2.754

6.  Efficacy of a Modified Scoring System to Facilitate Surgical Decision-making for Diaphyseal Malignancies: When is Devitalized Tumor-bearing Autograft of Value?

Authors:  Yu Chen; Xiu-Chun Yu
Journal:  Orthop Surg       Date:  2019-08-11       Impact factor: 2.071

7.  Short-term outcomes of reconstruction subsequent to intercalary resection of femoral diaphyseal metastatic tumor with pathological fracture: Comparison between segmental allograft and intercalary prosthesis.

Authors:  Deng-Xing Lun; Yong-Cheng Hu; Xiong-Gang Yang; Feng Wang; Zhao-Wan Xu
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2018-01-16       Impact factor: 2.967

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.