Literature DB >> 21666512

Role of socioeconomic status measures in long-term mortality risk prediction after myocardial infarction.

Noa Molshatzki1, Yaacov Drory, Vicki Myers, Uri Goldbourt, Yael Benyamini, David M Steinberg, Yariv Gerber.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The relationship of risk factors to outcomes has traditionally been assessed by measures of association such as odds ratio or hazard ratio and their statistical significance from an adjusted model. However, a strong, highly significant association does not guarantee a gain in stratification capacity. Using recently developed model performance indices, we evaluated the incremental discriminatory power of individual and neighborhood socioeconomic status (SES) measures after myocardial infarction (MI).
METHODS: Consecutive patients aged ≤65 years (N=1178) discharged from 8 hospitals in central Israel after incident MI in 1992 to 1993 were followed-up through 2005. A basic model (demographic variables, traditional cardiovascular risk factors, and disease severity indicators) was compared with an extended model including SES measures (education, income, employment, living with a steady partner, and neighborhood SES) in terms of Harrell c statistic, integrated discrimination improvement (IDI), and net reclassification improvement (NRI).
RESULTS: During the 13-year follow-up, 326 (28%) patients died. Cox proportional hazards models showed that all SES measures were significantly and independently associated with mortality. Furthermore, compared with the basic model, the extended model yielded substantial gains (all P<0.001) in c statistic (0.723 to 0.757), NRI (15.2%), IDI (5.9%), and relative IDI (32%). Improvement was observed both for sensitivity (classification of events) and specificity (classification of nonevents).
CONCLUSIONS: This study illustrates the additional insights that can be gained from considering the IDI and NRI measures of model performance and suggests that, among community patients with incident MI, incorporating SES measures into a clinical-based model substantially improves long-term mortality risk prediction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21666512     DOI: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e318222a508

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Care        ISSN: 0025-7079            Impact factor:   2.983


  11 in total

1.  Development and Validation of a County-Level Social Determinants of Health Risk Assessment Tool for Cardiovascular Disease.

Authors:  Young-Rock Hong; Arch G Mainous
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2020-07       Impact factor: 5.166

2.  Race, Socioeconomic Status, and Life Expectancy After Acute Myocardial Infarction.

Authors:  Emily M Bucholz; Shuangge Ma; Sharon-Lise T Normand; Harlan M Krumholz
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2015-09-14       Impact factor: 29.690

3.  What is the effect of area size when using local area practice style as an instrument?

Authors:  John M Brooks; Yuexin Tang; Cole G Chapman; Elizabeth A Cook; Elizabeth A Chrischilles
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 6.437

4.  Increased risk of vascular events in emergency room patients discharged home with diagnosis of dizziness or vertigo: a 3-year follow-up study.

Authors:  Ching-Chih Lee; Hsu-Chueh Ho; Yu-Chieh Su; Brian C-H Chiu; Yung-Cheng Su; Yi-Da Lee; Pesus Chou; Sou-Hsin Chien; Yung-Sung Huang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-04-27       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  The Impact of Comorbid Depression on Educational Inequality in Survival after Acute Coronary Syndrome in a Cohort of 83 062 Patients and a Matched Reference Population.

Authors:  Merete Osler; Eva Prescott; Ida Kim Wium-Andersen; Else Helene Ibfelt; Martin Balslev Jørgensen; Per Kragh Andersen; Terese Sara Høj Jørgensen; Marie Kim Wium-Andersen; Solvej Mårtensson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-10-29       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  The impact of the combination of income and education on the incidence of coronary heart disease in the prospective Reasons for Geographic and Racial Differences in Stroke (REGARDS) cohort study.

Authors:  Marquita W Lewis; Yulia Khodneva; Nicole Redmond; Raegan W Durant; Suzanne E Judd; Larrell L Wilkinson; Virginia J Howard; Monika M Safford
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2015-12-29       Impact factor: 3.295

7.  Expanded cardiac rehabilitation in socially vulnerable patients with myocardial infarction: a 10-year follow-up study focusing on mortality and non-fatal events.

Authors:  Kathrine Hald; Kirsten Melgaard Nielsen; Claus Vinther Nielsen; Lucette Kirsten Meillier; Finn Breinholt Larsen; Bo Christensen; Mogens Lytken Larsen
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-01-23       Impact factor: 2.692

8.  Neighborhood-level and individual-level socioeconomic status and self-reported management of ischaemic heart disease: cross-sectional results from the Korea Health Examinees Study.

Authors:  Jong-Koo Lee; Daehee Kang; Jongho Heo; Juhwan Oh; Hwa-Young Lee; Ji-Yeob Choi; Sujin Kim; S V Subramanian
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-03-27       Impact factor: 2.692

9.  Long-term survival among older patients with myocardial infarction differs by educational level: results from the MONICA/KORA myocardial infarction registry.

Authors:  Inge Kirchberger; Christa Meisinger; Hildegard Golüke; Margit Heier; Bernhard Kuch; Annette Peters; Philip A Quinones; Wolfgang von Scheidt; Andreas Mielck
Journal:  Int J Equity Health       Date:  2014-02-19

10.  Value of Neighborhood Socioeconomic Status in Predicting Risk of Outcomes in Studies That Use Electronic Health Record Data.

Authors:  Nrupen A Bhavsar; Aijing Gao; Matthew Phelan; Neha J Pagidipati; Benjamin A Goldstein
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2018-09-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.