BACKGROUND: Measles remains an important cause of morbidity and mortality in children in developing countries. Due to the success of the measles mortality reduction and elimination efforts thus far, the WHO has raised the question of whether global eradication of measles is economically feasible. METHODS: The cost-effectiveness of various measles mortality reduction and eradication scenarios was evaluated vis-à-vis the current mortality reduction goal in six countries and globally. Data collection on costs of measles vaccination were conducted in six countries in four regions: Bangladesh, Brazil, Colombia, Ethiopia, Tajikistan, and Uganda. The number of measles cases and deaths were projected from 2010 to 2050 using a dynamic, age-structured compartmental model. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were then calculated for each scenario vis a vis the baseline. RESULTS: Measles eradication by 2020 was the found to be the most cost-effective scenario, both in the six countries and globally. Eradicating measles by 2020 is projected to cost an additional discounted $7.8 billion and avert a discounted 346 million DALYs between 2010 and 2050. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, the study found that, compared to the baseline, reaching measles eradication by 2020 would be the most cost-effective measles mortality reduction scenario, both for the six countries and on a global basis.
BACKGROUND: Measles remains an important cause of morbidity and mortality in children in developing countries. Due to the success of the measles mortality reduction and elimination efforts thus far, the WHO has raised the question of whether global eradication of measles is economically feasible. METHODS: The cost-effectiveness of various measles mortality reduction and eradication scenarios was evaluated vis-à-vis the current mortality reduction goal in six countries and globally. Data collection on costs of measles vaccination were conducted in six countries in four regions: Bangladesh, Brazil, Colombia, Ethiopia, Tajikistan, and Uganda. The number of measles cases and deaths were projected from 2010 to 2050 using a dynamic, age-structured compartmental model. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were then calculated for each scenario vis a vis the baseline. RESULTS: Measles eradication by 2020 was the found to be the most cost-effective scenario, both in the six countries and globally. Eradicating measles by 2020 is projected to cost an additional discounted $7.8 billion and avert a discounted 346 million DALYs between 2010 and 2050. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, the study found that, compared to the baseline, reaching measles eradication by 2020 would be the most cost-effective measles mortality reduction scenario, both for the six countries and on a global basis.
Authors: Laura P Newman; Anne Njoroge; Amalia Magaret; Bhavna H Chohan; Veronicah W Gitomea; Anna Wald; Jonathan Gorstein; Julie Overbaugh; Dalton Wamalwa; Elizabeth Maleche-Obimbo; Ruth Nduati; Carey Farquhar Journal: Pediatr Infect Dis J Date: 2017-12 Impact factor: 2.129
Authors: Emily A Voigt; Inna G Ovsyannikova; Iana H Haralambieva; Richard B Kennedy; Beth R Larrabee; Daniel J Schaid; Gregory A Poland Journal: Vaccine Date: 2016-08-30 Impact factor: 3.641
Authors: Jan Felix Drexler; Victor Max Corman; Marcel Alexander Müller; Gael Darren Maganga; Peter Vallo; Tabea Binger; Florian Gloza-Rausch; Veronika M Cottontail; Andrea Rasche; Stoian Yordanov; Antje Seebens; Mirjam Knörnschild; Samuel Oppong; Yaw Adu Sarkodie; Célestin Pongombo; Alexander N Lukashev; Jonas Schmidt-Chanasit; Andreas Stöcker; Aroldo José Borges Carneiro; Stephanie Erbar; Andrea Maisner; Florian Fronhoffs; Reinhard Buettner; Elisabeth K V Kalko; Thomas Kruppa; Carlos Roberto Franke; René Kallies; Emmanuel R N Yandoko; Georg Herrler; Chantal Reusken; Alexandre Hassanin; Detlev H Krüger; Sonja Matthee; Rainer G Ulrich; Eric M Leroy; Christian Drosten Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2012-04-24 Impact factor: 14.919
Authors: Stéphane Verguet; Waasila Jassat; Melanie Y Bertram; Stephen M Tollman; Christopher J L Murray; Dean T Jamison; Karen J Hofman Journal: Glob Health Action Date: 2013-03-01 Impact factor: 2.640
Authors: Iana H Haralambieva; Whitney L Simon; Richard B Kennedy; Inna G Ovsyannikova; Nathaniel D Warner; Diane E Grill; Gregory A Poland Journal: Viruses Date: 2015-03-10 Impact factor: 5.048