Literature DB >> 21666154

Field effectiveness of live attenuated measles-containing vaccines: a review of published literature.

Amra Uzicanin1, Laura Zimmerman.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Information on measles vaccine effectiveness (VE) is critical to help inform policies for future global measles control goals.
METHODS: We reviewed results of VE studies published during 1960-2010.
RESULTS: Seventy papers with 135 VE point estimates were identified. For a single dose of vaccine administered at 9-11 months of age and ≥12 months, the median VE was 77.0% (interquartile range [IQR], 62%-91%) and 92.0% (IQR, 86%-96%), respectively. When analysis was restricted to include only point estimates for which vaccination history was verified and cases were laboratory confirmed, the median VE was 84.0% (IQR, 72.0%-95.0%) and 92.5% (IQR, 84.8%-97.0%) when vaccine was received at 9-11 and ≥12 months, respectively. Published VE vary by World Health Organization region, with generally lower estimates in countries belonging to the African and SouthEast Asian Regions. For 2 doses of measles-containing vaccine, compared with no vaccination, the median VE was 94.1% (IQR, 88.3%-98.3%).
CONCLUSIONS: The VE of the first dose of measles-containing vaccine administered at 9-11 months was lower than what would be expected from serologic evaluations but was higher than expected when administered at ≥12 months. The median VE increased in a subset of articles in which classification bias was reduced through verified vaccination history and laboratory confirmation. In general, 2 doses of measles-containing vaccine provided excellent protection against measles. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Infectious Diseases Society of America 2011.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21666154     DOI: 10.1093/infdis/jir102

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Infect Dis        ISSN: 0022-1899            Impact factor:   5.226


  59 in total

1.  The Reemergence of Measles.

Authors:  C L Abad; N Safdar
Journal:  Curr Infect Dis Rep       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 3.725

2.  Economic value of vaccinating geographically hard-to-reach populations with measles vaccine: A modeling application in Kenya.

Authors:  Bruce Y Lee; Shawn T Brown; Leila A Haidari; Samantha Clark; Taiwo Abimbola; Sarah E Pallas; Aaron S Wallace; Elizabeth A Mitgang; Jim Leonard; Sarah M Bartsch; Tatenda T Yemeke; Eli Zenkov; Sachiko Ozawa
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2019-03-25       Impact factor: 3.641

3.  Facebook and Twitter vaccine sentiment in response to measles outbreaks.

Authors:  Michael S Deiner; Cherie Fathy; Jessica Kim; Katherine Niemeyer; David Ramirez; Sarah F Ackley; Fengchen Liu; Thomas M Lietman; Travis C Porco
Journal:  Health Informatics J       Date:  2017-11-17       Impact factor: 2.681

4.  Measles outbreak response decision-making under uncertainty: a retrospective analysis.

Authors:  Christopher J Fonnesbeck; Katriona Shea; Spencer Carran; Jose Cassio de Moraes; Christopher Gregory; James L Goodson; Matthew J Ferrari
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 4.118

Review 5.  Measles, the need for a paradigm shift.

Authors:  Emilie Javelle; Philippe Colson; Philippe Parola; Didier Raoult
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2019-10-17       Impact factor: 8.082

Review 6.  Measles Vaccine.

Authors:  Diane E Griffin
Journal:  Viral Immunol       Date:  2017-12-19       Impact factor: 2.257

7.  A population profile of measles susceptibility in Tianjin, China.

Authors:  Matthew L Boulton; Xiexiu Wang; Ying Zhang; JoLynn P Montgomery; Abram L Wagner; Bradley F Carlson; Yaxing Ding; Xiaoyan Li; Brenda Gillespie; Xu Su
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2016-05-03       Impact factor: 3.641

Review 8.  The genetic basis for interindividual immune response variation to measles vaccine: new understanding and new vaccine approaches.

Authors:  Iana H Haralambieva; Inna G Ovsyannikova; V Shane Pankratz; Richard B Kennedy; Robert M Jacobson; Gregory A Poland
Journal:  Expert Rev Vaccines       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 5.217

9.  The impact of supplementary immunization activities on the epidemiology of measles in Tianjin, China.

Authors:  Abram L Wagner; Ying Zhang; Bhramar Mukherjee; Yaxing Ding; Eden V Wells; Matthew L Boulton
Journal:  Int J Infect Dis       Date:  2016-03-10       Impact factor: 3.623

10.  Toll-like receptor-8 agonistic activities in C2, C4, and C8 modified thiazolo[4,5-c]quinolines.

Authors:  Hari Prasad Kokatla; Euna Yoo; Deepak B Salunke; Diptesh Sil; Cameron F Ng; Rajalakshmi Balakrishna; Subbalakshmi S Malladi; Lauren M Fox; Sunil A David
Journal:  Org Biomol Chem       Date:  2013-02-21       Impact factor: 3.876

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.