Amra Uzicanin1, Laura Zimmerman. 1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia 30333, USA. aau5@cdc.gov
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Information on measles vaccine effectiveness (VE) is critical to help inform policies for future global measles control goals. METHODS: We reviewed results of VE studies published during 1960-2010. RESULTS: Seventy papers with 135 VE point estimates were identified. For a single dose of vaccine administered at 9-11 months of age and ≥12 months, the median VE was 77.0% (interquartile range [IQR], 62%-91%) and 92.0% (IQR, 86%-96%), respectively. When analysis was restricted to include only point estimates for which vaccination history was verified and cases were laboratory confirmed, the median VE was 84.0% (IQR, 72.0%-95.0%) and 92.5% (IQR, 84.8%-97.0%) when vaccine was received at 9-11 and ≥12 months, respectively. Published VE vary by World Health Organization region, with generally lower estimates in countries belonging to the African and SouthEast Asian Regions. For 2 doses of measles-containing vaccine, compared with no vaccination, the median VE was 94.1% (IQR, 88.3%-98.3%). CONCLUSIONS: The VE of the first dose of measles-containing vaccine administered at 9-11 months was lower than what would be expected from serologic evaluations but was higher than expected when administered at ≥12 months. The median VE increased in a subset of articles in which classification bias was reduced through verified vaccination history and laboratory confirmation. In general, 2 doses of measles-containing vaccine provided excellent protection against measles. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Infectious Diseases Society of America 2011.
BACKGROUND: Information on measles vaccine effectiveness (VE) is critical to help inform policies for future global measles control goals. METHODS: We reviewed results of VE studies published during 1960-2010. RESULTS: Seventy papers with 135 VE point estimates were identified. For a single dose of vaccine administered at 9-11 months of age and ≥12 months, the median VE was 77.0% (interquartile range [IQR], 62%-91%) and 92.0% (IQR, 86%-96%), respectively. When analysis was restricted to include only point estimates for which vaccination history was verified and cases were laboratory confirmed, the median VE was 84.0% (IQR, 72.0%-95.0%) and 92.5% (IQR, 84.8%-97.0%) when vaccine was received at 9-11 and ≥12 months, respectively. Published VE vary by World Health Organization region, with generally lower estimates in countries belonging to the African and SouthEast Asian Regions. For 2 doses of measles-containing vaccine, compared with no vaccination, the median VE was 94.1% (IQR, 88.3%-98.3%). CONCLUSIONS: The VE of the first dose of measles-containing vaccine administered at 9-11 months was lower than what would be expected from serologic evaluations but was higher than expected when administered at ≥12 months. The median VE increased in a subset of articles in which classification bias was reduced through verified vaccination history and laboratory confirmation. In general, 2 doses of measles-containing vaccine provided excellent protection against measles. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Infectious Diseases Society of America 2011.
Authors: Bruce Y Lee; Shawn T Brown; Leila A Haidari; Samantha Clark; Taiwo Abimbola; Sarah E Pallas; Aaron S Wallace; Elizabeth A Mitgang; Jim Leonard; Sarah M Bartsch; Tatenda T Yemeke; Eli Zenkov; Sachiko Ozawa Journal: Vaccine Date: 2019-03-25 Impact factor: 3.641
Authors: Michael S Deiner; Cherie Fathy; Jessica Kim; Katherine Niemeyer; David Ramirez; Sarah F Ackley; Fengchen Liu; Thomas M Lietman; Travis C Porco Journal: Health Informatics J Date: 2017-11-17 Impact factor: 2.681
Authors: Christopher J Fonnesbeck; Katriona Shea; Spencer Carran; Jose Cassio de Moraes; Christopher Gregory; James L Goodson; Matthew J Ferrari Journal: J R Soc Interface Date: 2018-03 Impact factor: 4.118
Authors: Matthew L Boulton; Xiexiu Wang; Ying Zhang; JoLynn P Montgomery; Abram L Wagner; Bradley F Carlson; Yaxing Ding; Xiaoyan Li; Brenda Gillespie; Xu Su Journal: Vaccine Date: 2016-05-03 Impact factor: 3.641
Authors: Iana H Haralambieva; Inna G Ovsyannikova; V Shane Pankratz; Richard B Kennedy; Robert M Jacobson; Gregory A Poland Journal: Expert Rev Vaccines Date: 2013-01 Impact factor: 5.217
Authors: Abram L Wagner; Ying Zhang; Bhramar Mukherjee; Yaxing Ding; Eden V Wells; Matthew L Boulton Journal: Int J Infect Dis Date: 2016-03-10 Impact factor: 3.623
Authors: Hari Prasad Kokatla; Euna Yoo; Deepak B Salunke; Diptesh Sil; Cameron F Ng; Rajalakshmi Balakrishna; Subbalakshmi S Malladi; Lauren M Fox; Sunil A David Journal: Org Biomol Chem Date: 2013-02-21 Impact factor: 3.876