Literature DB >> 21665871

Electrophoretic sperm isolation: optimization of electrophoresis conditions and impact on oxidative stress.

R John Aitken1, Adrienne R Hanson, Lesley Kuczera.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to optimize the electrophoretic conditions that should be used for the effective isolation of functional human spermatozoa and to determine whether this method of isolating cells was associated with oxidative stress and DNA damage.
METHODS: Human spermatozoa were prepared by repeated centrifugation, discontinuous density gradient centrifugation and electrophoresis followed by assessments of sperm quality.
RESULTS: Systematic analysis of optimal electrophoresis conditions demonstrated that field strength was positively correlated with sperm recovery rates but negatively correlated with sperm movement, irrespective of whether the current or the voltage was held constant. This loss of functionality observed at high power settings was not associated with a major increase in superoxide generation or the induction of oxidative DNA damage. In contrast, discontinuous Percoll gradient centrifugation was shown to produce a significant rise in oxidative DNA base adduct expression in live cells (P < 0.05). As a result of these analyses, optimized electrophoretic conditions were defined that permitted sperm recovery rates of around 20%. These electrophoretically isolated cells were not only free of oxidative stress but exhibited significantly enhanced motility (P < 0.01) and vitality (P < 0.001) compared with the original samples.
CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that while field strength is positively correlated with sperm recovery rates; it is negatively associated with sperm motility. Optimized conditions are described that represent a balance between these opposing forces and permit the isolation of highly motile, vital sperm populations, free from the oxidative DNA damage associated with conventional density gradient centrifugation technologies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21665871     DOI: 10.1093/humrep/der162

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  5 in total

1.  Optimization of microelectrophoresis to select highly negatively charged sperm.

Authors:  Luke Simon; Kristin Murphy; Kenneth I Aston; Benjamin R Emery; James M Hotaling; Douglas T Carrell
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2016-03-23       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 2.  Sperm preparation: state-of-the-art--physiological aspects and application of advanced sperm preparation methods.

Authors:  Ralf Henkel
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2011-12-05       Impact factor: 3.285

3.  Isolating motile sperm cell sorting using biocompatible electrospun membranes.

Authors:  Roberto D Katigbak; Ludovic F Dumée; Lingxue Kong
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-04-11       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 4.  Sperm selection in natural conception: what can we learn from Mother Nature to improve assisted reproduction outcomes?

Authors:  Denny Sakkas; Mythili Ramalingam; Nicolas Garrido; Christopher L R Barratt
Journal:  Hum Reprod Update       Date:  2015-09-19       Impact factor: 15.610

Review 5.  Sperm Oxidative Stress during In Vitro Manipulation and Its Effects on Sperm Function and Embryo Development.

Authors:  Roberto Gualtieri; Guruprasad Kalthur; Vincenza Barbato; Salvatore Longobardi; Francesca Di Rella; Satish Kumar Adiga; Riccardo Talevi
Journal:  Antioxidants (Basel)       Date:  2021-06-25
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.