Literature DB >> 21665542

Conventional ovarian stimulation no longer exists: welcome to the age of individualized ovarian stimulation.

Luciano G Nardo1, Richard Fleming, Colin M Howles, Ernesto Bosch, Samir Hamamah, Filippo M Ubaldi, Jean-Noel Hugues, Adam H Balen, Scott M Nelson.   

Abstract

The prediction of extremes of ovarian response to stimulation and the irreversibility of reduced ovarian reserve remain important clinical and basic science research issues of IVF treatment. Recommending commencement of ovarian stimulation using any of the available exogenous compounds without knowledge of individual ovarian potentials is simplistic and dangerous because of the possible adverse consequences for the woman. The identification of groups of patients likely to benefit from one protocol than another is central to the workup process of IVF. Determining the agents for ovarian stimulation as well as the combination of them, the daily dose and duration according to some background information should be seen as the way to enhance safety and cost-effectiveness. This discussion paper aims to introduce the concept of individualized ovarian stimulation in routine clinical practice and to generate interest for tailored stimulation protocols. Crown
Copyright © 2011. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21665542     DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2011.05.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online        ISSN: 1472-6483            Impact factor:   3.828


  9 in total

1.  The Ideal Stimulation Protocol: Is There One?

Authors:  Gautam N Allahbadia
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India       Date:  2015-07-01

2.  Prognostic models for high and low ovarian responses in controlled ovarian stimulation using a GnRH antagonist protocol.

Authors:  Frank J Broekmans; Pierre J M Verweij; Marinus J C Eijkemans; Bernadette M J L Mannaerts; Han Witjes
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2014-06-05       Impact factor: 6.918

3.  Discrepancies between Antimullerian Hormone and Follicle Stimulating Hormone in Assisted Reproduction.

Authors:  Munawar Hussain; David Cahill; Valentine Akande; Uma Gordon
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Int       Date:  2013-12-18

Review 4.  Low-cost in vitro fertilization: current insights.

Authors:  Pek Joo Teoh; Abha Maheshwari
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2014-08-21

5.  Individualized Treatment from Theory to Practice: The Private Case of Adding LH during GnRH Antagonist-based Stimulation Protocol.

Authors:  Shahar Kol
Journal:  Clin Med Insights Reprod Health       Date:  2014-10-14

6.  Anovulatory Patients Demonstrate a Sharp Decline in LH Levels upon GnRH Antagonist Administration during IVF Cycles.

Authors:  Linoy Segal; Ofer Fainaru; Shahar Kol
Journal:  Rambam Maimonides Med J       Date:  2017-04-28

7.  The effect of the pooling method on the live birth rate in poor ovarian responders according to the Bologna criteria.

Authors:  Serdar Çelik; Niyazi Emre Turgut; Dilek Cengiz Çelik; Kübra Boynukalın; Remzi Abalı; Sevim Purisa; Erbil Yağmur; Mustafa Bahçeci
Journal:  Turk J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2018-03-29

8.  A randomized controlled trial of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist versus gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist in Iranian infertile couples: oocyte gene expression.

Authors:  Fatemeh Sadat Hoseini; Seyed Mohammad Hossein Noori Mugahi; Firoozeh Akbari-Asbagh; Poopak Eftekhari-Yazdi; Behrouz Aflatoonian; Seyed Hamid Aghaee-Bakhtiari; Reza Aflatoonian; Nasser Salsabili
Journal:  Daru       Date:  2014-10-07       Impact factor: 3.117

Review 9.  Severe male factor in in vitro fertilization: definition, prevalence, and treatment. An update.

Authors:  Rossella Mazzilli; Alberto Vaiarelli; Lisa Dovere; Danilo Cimadomo; Nicolò Ubaldi; Susanna Ferrero; Laura Rienzi; Francesco Lombardo; Andrea Lenzi; Herman Tournaye; Filippo Maria Ubaldi
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2022 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.285

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.