Literature DB >> 21665418

Noninvasive detection of elevated intracranial pressure using a portable ultrasound system.

Bertrand Prunet1, Yves Asencio, Guillaume Lacroix, Ambroise Montcriol, Arnaud Dagain, Jean Cotte, Pierre Esnault, Henry Boret, Eric Meaudre, Eric Kaiser.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to prospectively compare the accuracies of transcranial color-coded sonography (TCCS) and transcranial Doppler (TCD) in the diagnosis of elevated intracranial pressure.
METHODS: A prospective, blinded, head-to-head comparison of TCD and TCCS methods using intracranial pressure (ICP) measured continuously via an intraparenchymal catheter as the reference standard in 2 groups of 20 neurocritical care patients each: high ICP (group 1) and normal ICP (group 2). Middle cerebral artery (MCA) pulsatility index (PI) recordings from all patients' sonographic reports were selected based on the highest left or right recorded MCA PI. Transcranial Doppler was performed using a dedicated TCD device, and TCCS was performed using a portable ultrasound system.
RESULTS: The PI values obtained did not differ significantly between the 2 methods (group 1, P = .46; group 2, P = .11). Linear regression analysis identified a significant relationship between PI obtained with both methods (r = 0.897; P < .0001). The duration of PI measurement was statistically longer with TCCS than TCD (group 1, P < .01; group 2, P < .01). Diagnostic accuracies were good and similar for both methods (TCD area under curve, 0.901; TCCS area under curve 0.870; P = .69).
CONCLUSIONS: This work is a pilot study comparing TCCS and TCD in the detection of elevated ICP. This study suggests that a bedside portable ultrasound system may be useful to determine MCA PI with accuracy similar to that of a dedicated TCD device.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21665418     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2011.05.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Emerg Med        ISSN: 0735-6757            Impact factor:   2.469


  5 in total

Review 1.  Noninvasive methods of detecting increased intracranial pressure.

Authors:  Wen Xu; Patrick Gerety; Tomas Aleman; Jordan Swanson; Jesse Taylor
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2016-06-28       Impact factor: 1.475

Review 2.  Noninvasive Neuromonitoring: Current Utility in Subarachnoid Hemorrhage, Traumatic Brain Injury, and Stroke.

Authors:  Luisa Vinciguerra; Julian Bösel
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 3.210

Review 3.  Review: pathophysiology of intracranial hypertension and noninvasive intracranial pressure monitoring.

Authors:  Nicolas Canac; Kian Jalaleddini; Samuel G Thorpe; Corey M Thibeault; Robert B Hamilton
Journal:  Fluids Barriers CNS       Date:  2020-06-23

4.  Prospective Study on Noninvasive Assessment of Intracranial Pressure in Traumatic Brain-Injured Patients: Comparison of Four Methods.

Authors:  Danilo Cardim; Chiara Robba; Joseph Donnelly; Michal Bohdanowicz; Bernhard Schmidt; Maxwell Damian; Georgios V Varsos; Xiuyun Liu; Manuel Cabeleira; Gustavo Frigieri; Brenno Cabella; Peter Smielewski; Sergio Mascarenhas; Marek Czosnyka
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2015-12-17       Impact factor: 5.269

5.  Noninvasive evaluation of intracranial pressure in patients with traumatic brain injury by transcranial Doppler ultrasound.

Authors:  Tao Chang; Xigang Yan; Chao Zhao; Yufu Zhang; Bao Wang; Li Gao
Journal:  Brain Behav       Date:  2021-11-01       Impact factor: 2.708

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.