Literature DB >> 21665392

The incidence of drugs of impairment in oral fluid from random roadside testing.

Mark Chu1, Dimitri Gerostamoulos, Jochen Beyer, Luke Rodda, Martin Boorman, Olaf H Drummer.   

Abstract

Oral fluid (OF) has become a popular specimen to test for presence of drugs, particularly in regards to road safety. In Victoria, OF specimens from drivers have been used to test for the presence of methylamphetamine (MA) and Δ(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) since 2003 and 3,4-methylenedioxy-N-methylamphetamine (MDMA) since 2006. LC-MS/MS has been used to test the most recent 853 submitted OF specimens from Victoria Police for 31 drugs of abuse including those listed in the Australian Standard AS4760-2006. At least one proscribed drug was detected in 96% of drivers, of which MA was the most common (77%), followed by THC (42%), MDMA (17%) and the combination of all three (3.9%). Opioids were detected in 14% of drivers of which 4.8% were positive for 6-acetylmorphine and 3.3% for methadone. The incidence of the opioids tramadol (1.2%) and oxycodone (1.1%) were relatively low. Cocaine (8.0%) was as commonly detected as benzodiazepines (8.0%), and was almost always found in combination with MA (7.9%). Samples positive to benzodiazepines were largely due to diazepam (3.5%) and alprazolam (3.4%), with only 0.2% of drivers combining the two. Ketamine was also detected in 1.5% of cases. While the incidences of the proscribed drugs itself are concerning, it is clear that many drivers are also using other drugs capable of causing impairment.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21665392     DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2011.05.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Forensic Sci Int        ISSN: 0379-0738            Impact factor:   2.395


  7 in total

Review 1.  In the Zzz zone: the effects of Z-drugs on human performance and driving.

Authors:  Naren Gunja
Journal:  J Med Toxicol       Date:  2013-06

Review 2.  Current knowledge on cannabinoids in oral fluid.

Authors:  Dayong Lee; Marilyn A Huestis
Journal:  Drug Test Anal       Date:  2013-08-25       Impact factor: 3.345

Review 3.  Establishing legal limits for driving under the influence of marijuana.

Authors:  Kristin Wong; Joanne E Brady; Guohua Li
Journal:  Inj Epidemiol       Date:  2014-10-29

4.  Prevalence and Predictors of Driving after Prescription Opioid Use in an Adult ED Sample.

Authors:  Aaron D Dora-Laskey; Jason E Goldstick; Brooke J Arterberry; Suni Jo Roberts; Rebecca L Haffajee; Amy S B Bohnert; Rebecca M Cunningham; Patrick M Carter
Journal:  West J Emerg Med       Date:  2020-06-19

5.  A comprehensive breath test that confirms recent use of inhaled cannabis within the impairment window.

Authors:  Michael W DeGregorio; Gregory T Wurz; Edward Montoya; Chiao-Jung Kao
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-11-23       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Disposable screen printed sensor for the electrochemical detection of delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol in undiluted saliva.

Authors:  Ceri Wanklyn; Dan Burton; Emma Enston; Carrie-Ann Bartlett; Sarah Taylor; Aleksandra Raniczkowska; Murdo Black; Lindy Murphy
Journal:  Chem Cent J       Date:  2016-01-21       Impact factor: 4.215

7.  Disposable screen printed sensor for the electrochemical detection of methamphetamine in undiluted saliva.

Authors:  Carrie-Ann Bartlett; Sarah Taylor; Carlos Fernandez; Ceri Wanklyn; Daniel Burton; Emma Enston; Aleksandra Raniczkowska; Murdo Black; Lindy Murphy
Journal:  Chem Cent J       Date:  2016-02-01       Impact factor: 4.215

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.