PURPOSE: To determine the incidence of bur breakage in routine orthognathic surgery, as well as its postsurgical sequela, and to illustrate 2 cases with more than 6 months' follow-up. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective evaluation of case records of 76 consecutive orthognathic surgical procedures performed by a team of 2 surgeons over a period of 16 months, between January 2009 and July 2010, at a single center. RESULTS: Surgical bur breakage was reported in 5 patients in the series. Of these, 3 were retrieved whereas 2 were not, 1 of which caused a foreign body reaction in the patient, which persisted for a duration of almost 1 year. CONCLUSION: Instrument breakage may be a relatively common occurrence with the use of surgical burs in orthognathic surgery but its incidence is seldom recorded or reported. This study gives insight into the probability of postoperative sequela of these instruments when left in situ and a protocol for management of broken instruments.
PURPOSE: To determine the incidence of bur breakage in routine orthognathic surgery, as well as its postsurgical sequela, and to illustrate 2 cases with more than 6 months' follow-up. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective evaluation of case records of 76 consecutive orthognathic surgical procedures performed by a team of 2 surgeons over a period of 16 months, between January 2009 and July 2010, at a single center. RESULTS: Surgical bur breakage was reported in 5 patients in the series. Of these, 3 were retrieved whereas 2 were not, 1 of which caused a foreign body reaction in the patient, which persisted for a duration of almost 1 year. CONCLUSION: Instrument breakage may be a relatively common occurrence with the use of surgical burs in orthognathic surgery but its incidence is seldom recorded or reported. This study gives insight into the probability of postoperative sequela of these instruments when left in situ and a protocol for management of broken instruments.