BACKGROUND: Zoledronic acid (ZA) reduces skeletal complications in breast cancer patients with bone metastases. This study explored relationships between ZA treatment persistence and patient outcomes. METHODS: Two thousand three hundred ninety-four female patients with breast cancer and bone metastasis were identified from the PharMetrics(®) Integrated Database between January 2003 and October 2006. Of these women, 714 (29.7%) received ZA; the remainder received no intravenous (IV) bisphosphonate (untreated). ZA treatment persistence was measured from first treatment to the first treatment gap > 45 days. Treatment persistence was categorized as short (≤ 90 days, n = 230), medium (91-180 days, n = 171), or long (> 180 days, n = 313). Relationships between ZA treatment and persistence on outcomes were assessed in regression models adjusted for age, comorbidities, and propensity to receive treatment. RESULTS: Compared with untreated patients, after multivariate adjustment, ZA-treated patients experienced a 25% lower rate of skeletal complications (P < .05), were at lower risk for skeletal complications or loss to follow-up (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.67; P < .001), and had 41% longer follow-up time (P < .001). The skeletal complication risk was lower in the long-persistence group than in the short-persistence group (HR = 0.576; P < .05). In patients with ≥ 1 skeletal complication, the long-persistence group had 39% fewer skeletal complications than the short-persistence group (P < .01). The medium- and long-persistence groups had 40% and 139% longer follow-up than the short-persistence group (both P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: ZA treatment was associated with lower risk and frequency of skeletal complications and longer follow-up time. Greater persistence with ZA treatment was associated with better outcomes.
BACKGROUND:Zoledronic acid (ZA) reduces skeletal complications in breast cancerpatients with bone metastases. This study explored relationships between ZA treatment persistence and patient outcomes. METHODS: Two thousand three hundred ninety-four female patients with breast cancer and bone metastasis were identified from the PharMetrics(®) Integrated Database between January 2003 and October 2006. Of these women, 714 (29.7%) received ZA; the remainder received no intravenous (IV) bisphosphonate (untreated). ZA treatment persistence was measured from first treatment to the first treatment gap > 45 days. Treatment persistence was categorized as short (≤ 90 days, n = 230), medium (91-180 days, n = 171), or long (> 180 days, n = 313). Relationships between ZA treatment and persistence on outcomes were assessed in regression models adjusted for age, comorbidities, and propensity to receive treatment. RESULTS: Compared with untreated patients, after multivariate adjustment, ZA-treated patients experienced a 25% lower rate of skeletal complications (P < .05), were at lower risk for skeletal complications or loss to follow-up (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.67; P < .001), and had 41% longer follow-up time (P < .001). The skeletal complication risk was lower in the long-persistence group than in the short-persistence group (HR = 0.576; P < .05). In patients with ≥ 1 skeletal complication, the long-persistence group had 39% fewer skeletal complications than the short-persistence group (P < .01). The medium- and long-persistence groups had 40% and 139% longer follow-up than the short-persistence group (both P < .001). CONCLUSIONS:ZA treatment was associated with lower risk and frequency of skeletal complications and longer follow-up time. Greater persistence with ZA treatment was associated with better outcomes.
Authors: Gerry Oster; Lois Lamerato; Andrew G Glass; Kathryn E Richert-Boe; Andrea Lopez; Karen Chung; Akshara Richhariya; Tracy Dodge; Greg G Wolff; Arun Balakumaran; John Edelsberg Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2014-01-04 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Mashari Alzahrani; Carol Stober; Michelle Liu; Arif Awan; Terry L Ng; Gregory Pond; Bader Alshamsan; Lisa Vandermeer; Mark Clemons Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2022-01-21 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Brian Hutton; Christina Addison; Sasha Mazzarello; Anil A Joy; Nathaniel Bouganim; Dean Fergusson; Mark Clemons Journal: J Bone Oncol Date: 2013-04-15 Impact factor: 4.072
Authors: Ingo Diel; Sonja Ansorge; David Hohmann; Christina Giannopoulou; Daniela Niepel; Michele Intorcia Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2020-02-21 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Leah J McGrath; Robert A Overman; Diane Reams; Karynsa Cetin; Alexander Liede; Steven A Narod; M Alan Brookhart; Rohini K Hernandez Journal: Clin Epidemiol Date: 2018-09-26 Impact factor: 4.790