Literature DB >> 21664919

Search asymmetries: parallel processing of uncertain sensory information.

Benjamin T Vincent1.   

Abstract

What is the mechanism underlying search phenomena such as search asymmetry? Two-stage models such as Feature Integration Theory and Guided Search propose parallel pre-attentive processing followed by serial post-attentive processing. They claim search asymmetry effects are indicative of finding pairs of features, one processed in parallel, the other in serial. An alternative proposal is that a 1-stage parallel process is responsible, and search asymmetries occur when one stimulus has greater internal uncertainty associated with it than another. While the latter account is simpler, only a few studies have set out to empirically test its quantitative predictions, and many researchers still subscribe to the 2-stage account. This paper examines three separate parallel models (Bayesian optimal observer, max rule, and a heuristic decision rule). All three parallel models can account for search asymmetry effects and I conclude that either people can optimally utilise the uncertain sensory data available to them, or are able to select heuristic decision rules which approximate optimal performance.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21664919     DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2011.05.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  7 in total

Review 1.  Metacognitive asymmetries in visual perception.

Authors:  Matan Mazor; Rani Moran; Stephen M Fleming
Journal:  Neurosci Conscious       Date:  2021-10-19

2.  Asymmetry of automatic change detection shown by the visual mismatch negativity: an additional feature is identified faster than missing features.

Authors:  István Czigler; István Sulykos; Krisztina Kecskés-Kovács
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 3.526

3.  Metacognitive asymmetries in visual perception.

Authors:  Matan Mazor; Rani Moran; Stephen M Fleming
Journal:  Neurosci Conscious       Date:  2021-06-21

4.  Search performance is better predicted by tileability than presence of a unique basic feature.

Authors:  Honghua Chang; Ruth Rosenholtz
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2016-08-01       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  Feature reliability determines specificity and transfer of perceptual learning in orientation search.

Authors:  Amit Yashar; Rachel N Denison
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2017-12-14       Impact factor: 4.475

6.  Turning visual search time on its head.

Authors:  S P Arun
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2012-04-25       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  How the forest interacts with the trees: Multiscale shape integration explains global and local processing.

Authors:  Georgin Jacob; S P Arun
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2020-10-01       Impact factor: 2.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.