Literature DB >> 21663722

Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using patellar tendon versus hamstring tendon: a prospective comparative study with 9-year follow-up.

Benjamin Wipfler1, Stefanie Donner, Christian M Zechmann, Jan Springer, Rainer Siebold, Hans Heinrich Paessler.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To analyze the long-term evaluation of clinical, functional, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) results after implant-free press-fit anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction with bone-patella tendon (BPT) versus quadrupled hamstring tendon (HT) grafts.
METHODS: Sixty-two ACL-insufficient patients were included in a prospective, randomized study (31 BPT and 31 HT). Both surgical procedures were performed without any implants by a press-fit technique by the senior author. The femoral tunnel was drilled through the anteromedial portal for anatomic placement. At 8.8 years after reconstruction, 53 patients (28 BPT and 25 HT) were examined by different clinical and functional tests. Bilateral MRI scans were performed and interpreted by an independent radiologist.
RESULTS: On follow-up, the score on the International Knee Documentation Committee evaluation form was significantly better in the HT group. The clinical examination including range of motion, KT-1000 test (MEDmetric, San Diego, CA), and pivot-shift test showed no significant differences. On isokinetic testing, the mean quadriceps strength was close to normal (96%) in both groups, but the hamstring strength was lower in the HT group (100.3%/95.1%). Kneeling (1.5/1.1, P = .002), knee walking (1.72/1.14, P = .002), and single-leg hop test (95.8%/99.1%, P = .057) were better in the HT group. The MRI findings about the mean degree of cartilage lesion (International Cartilage Repair Society protocol) of the operated (2.1/2.1) and nonoperated (1.4/1.8) knee showed no significant differences. No significant difference was found in the grade of medial or lateral meniscal lesion or the number of patients having meniscal lesions when the operated and nonoperated knees were compared. Tunnel measurements, Caton-Deschamps Index, and the sagittal ACL angle were similar.
CONCLUSIONS: The implant-free press-fit technique for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction by use of bone-patellar tendon and hamstring grafts with anatomic graft placement is an innovative technique to preserve the cartilage and meniscal status without significant differences between the operated and nonoperated knees in the long term. Significantly less anterior knee pain was noted in the hamstring group, when testing for kneeling and knee walking. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II, prospective comparative study.
Copyright © 2011 Arthroscopy Association of North America. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21663722     DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2011.01.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arthroscopy        ISSN: 0749-8063            Impact factor:   4.772


  40 in total

1.  Long-term follow-up of patellar tendon grafts or hamstring tendon grafts in endoscopic ACL reconstructions.

Authors:  Tone Gifstad; Anita Sole; Torbjørn Strand; Gisle Uppheim; Torbjørn Grøntvedt; Jon Olav Drogset
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-03-10       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Femoral fixation of hamstring tendon grafts in ACL reconstructions: the 2-year follow-up results of a prospective randomized controlled study.

Authors:  Tone Gifstad; Jon Olav Drogset; Torbjørn Grøntvedt; Grete Sofie Hortemo
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-09-05       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Arthroscopic single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with six-strand hamstring tendon allograft versus bone-patellar tendon-bone allograft.

Authors:  Chengliang Dai; Fei Wang; Xiaomeng Wang; Ruipeng Wang; Shengjie Wang; Shiyu Tang
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-03-13       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Clinical, functional, and isokinetic study of a prospective series of anterior cruciate ligament ligamentoplasty with pedicular hamstrings.

Authors:  David Bahlau; Henri Favreau; David Eichler; Sébastien Lustig; François Bonnomet; Matthieu Ehlinger
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2019-08-24       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  MRI observations of patellar tendon length change after ACL reconstruction with hamstring autografts.

Authors:  Hao-Huan Li; Xiao-Long Zhang; Gota Ooi; Numazaki Hironori; Miho Sekiguchi; Shin-Ichi Konno
Journal:  J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci       Date:  2017-08-08

6.  A Single Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction (ACL-R) Using Hamstring Tendon Autograft and Tibialis Anterior Tendon Allograft: A Comparative Study.

Authors:  Saroj Rai; Sheng-Yang Jin; Bimal Rai; Nira Tamang; Wei Huang; Xian-Zhe Liu; Chun-Qing Meng; Hong Wang
Journal:  Curr Med Sci       Date:  2018-10-20

Review 7.  Network meta-analysis of knee outcomes following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with various types of tendon grafts.

Authors:  Xiong-Gang Yang; Feng Wang; Xin He; Jiang-Tao Feng; Yong-Cheng Hu; Hao Zhang; Li Yang; Kunchi Hua
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2019-12-19       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  The effect of remnant preservation on tibial tunnel enlargement in ACL reconstruction with hamstring autograft: a prospective randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Qiang Zhang; Shu Zhang; Xuecheng Cao; Lifeng Liu; Ya Liu; Rui Li
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-12-15       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 9.  Long-term follow-up of ACL reconstruction with hamstring autograft.

Authors:  Jeff R S Leiter; Robert Gourlay; Sheila McRae; Nevin de Korompay; Peter B MacDonald
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-04-18       Impact factor: 4.342

10.  Long-term results after reconstruction of the ACL with hamstrings autograft and transtibial femoral drilling.

Authors:  Eivind Inderhaug; Torbjørn Strand; Cornelia Fischer-Bredenbeck; Eirik Solheim
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-12-08       Impact factor: 4.342

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.