BACKGROUND/AIMS: To retrospectively evaluate the clinical values of C12 multi-tumor markers protein chip system in gastric cancer (GC) and screen for GC related tumor markers so as to provide a theoretical base for the establishment of GC diagnostic biochips. METHODOLOGY: The sera of 156 GC patients were detected for 12 common tumor markers using the C12 tumor markers protein chip. GC related parameters were analyzed by Kappa test and cost-effectiveness analysis to find the most optimal tumor marker combination. RESULTS: Carbohydrate antigen (CA) 19-9 (20.5%), CA242 (19.9%), carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA, 17.3%), CA125 (7.1%) were major tumor markers increased among the 156 GC patients. Kappa test revealed 6 tumor marker combinations having strong consistency with the detection results of C12 tumor markers proteinchip, and CA19-9 plus CEA proved to be the best combination by cost-effectiveness analysis. CONCLUSIONS: C12 tumor markers protein chip system had limited value in the diagnosis of GC, and the design of chip was too complicated and costly for widespread screening among the high risk populations. Searching for new GC biomarkers and designing small diagnostic chip could significantly enhance the clinical value of tumor markers in terms of diagnostic rate and practical utility.
BACKGROUND/AIMS: To retrospectively evaluate the clinical values of C12 multi-tumor markers protein chip system in gastric cancer (GC) and screen for GC related tumor markers so as to provide a theoretical base for the establishment of GC diagnostic biochips. METHODOLOGY: The sera of 156 GC patients were detected for 12 common tumor markers using the C12 tumor markers protein chip. GC related parameters were analyzed by Kappa test and cost-effectiveness analysis to find the most optimal tumor marker combination. RESULTS: Carbohydrate antigen (CA) 19-9 (20.5%), CA242 (19.9%), carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA, 17.3%), CA125 (7.1%) were major tumor markers increased among the 156 GC patients. Kappa test revealed 6 tumor marker combinations having strong consistency with the detection results of C12 tumor markers proteinchip, and CA19-9 plus CEA proved to be the best combination by cost-effectiveness analysis. CONCLUSIONS:C12 tumor markers protein chip system had limited value in the diagnosis of GC, and the design of chip was too complicated and costly for widespread screening among the high risk populations. Searching for new GC biomarkers and designing small diagnostic chip could significantly enhance the clinical value of tumor markers in terms of diagnostic rate and practical utility.