PURPOSE:Fatigue is one of the most disturbing complaints of cancer patients and is often the reason for discontinuing treatment. This randomized controlled study tested the hypothesis that increased morning bright light, compared to dim light, would result in less fatigue in women with breast cancer undergoing chemotherapy. METHODS:Thirty-nine women newly diagnosed with stageI-III breast cancer were randomized to either bright white light (BWL) or dim red light (DRL) treatment and were instructed to use the light box for 30 min every morning throughout the first four cycles of chemotherapy. The Multidimensional Fatigue Symptom Inventory was administered prior to the start of chemotherapy (baseline), during the chemotherapy treatment week of cycle 1 (C1TW), the last week (recovery week) of cycle 1 (C1RW), the chemotherapy treatment week of cycle 4 (C4TW), and the last week (recovery week) of cycle 4 (C4RW). RESULTS: The DRL group reported increased fatigue at C1TW (p = 0.003) and C4TW (p < 0.001) compared to baseline, while there was no significant change from baseline in the BWL group. A secondary analysis showed that the increases in fatigue levels in the DRL group were not mediated through nor associated with changes in sleep or in circadian rhythms as measured with wrist actigraphy. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study suggest that morning bright light treatment may prevent overall fatigue from worsening during chemotherapy. Although our hypothesis that overall fatigue would improve with bright light treatment was not supported, the lack of deterioration in total fatigue scores suggests that bright morning light may be a useful intervention during chemotherapy for breast cancer.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE:Fatigue is one of the most disturbing complaints of cancerpatients and is often the reason for discontinuing treatment. This randomized controlled study tested the hypothesis that increased morning bright light, compared to dim light, would result in less fatigue in women with breast cancer undergoing chemotherapy. METHODS: Thirty-nine women newly diagnosed with stage I-III breast cancer were randomized to either bright white light (BWL) or dim red light (DRL) treatment and were instructed to use the light box for 30 min every morning throughout the first four cycles of chemotherapy. The Multidimensional Fatigue Symptom Inventory was administered prior to the start of chemotherapy (baseline), during the chemotherapy treatment week of cycle 1 (C1TW), the last week (recovery week) of cycle 1 (C1RW), the chemotherapy treatment week of cycle 4 (C4TW), and the last week (recovery week) of cycle 4 (C4RW). RESULTS: The DRL group reported increased fatigue at C1TW (p = 0.003) and C4TW (p < 0.001) compared to baseline, while there was no significant change from baseline in the BWL group. A secondary analysis showed that the increases in fatigue levels in the DRL group were not mediated through nor associated with changes in sleep or in circadian rhythms as measured with wrist actigraphy. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study suggest that morning bright light treatment may prevent overall fatigue from worsening during chemotherapy. Although our hypothesis that overall fatigue would improve with bright light treatment was not supported, the lack of deterioration in total fatigue scores suggests that bright morning light may be a useful intervention during chemotherapy for breast cancer.
Authors: Sonia Ancoli-Israel; Jennifer L Martin; Daniel F Kripke; Matthew Marler; Melville R Klauber Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2002-02 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Joseph A Roscoe; Gary R Morrow; Jane T Hickok; Peter Bushunow; Sara Matteson; Dmitry Rakita; Paul L R Andrews Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2001-11-28 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Kristine A Donovan; Kevin D Stein; Morgan Lee; Corinne R Leach; Onaedo Ilozumba; Paul B Jacobsen Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2014-08-22 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Jillian A Johnson; Sheila N Garland; Linda E Carlson; Josée Savard; J Steven A Simpson; Sonia Ancoli-Israel; Tavis S Campbell Journal: J Cancer Surviv Date: 2017-11-10 Impact factor: 4.442
Authors: Valerie McLaughlin Crabtree; Amanda M Rach; Kriston B Schellinger; Kathryn M Russell; Teresa Hammarback; Belinda N Mandrell Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2014-08-13 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: William H Redd; Heiddis Valdimarsdottir; Lisa M Wu; Gary Winkel; Emily E Byrne; Melba A Beltre; Elizabeth S Liebman; Tanya Erazo; Judy A Hayes; Luis Isola; Eileen Scigliano; Yeraz Meschian; Susan Lutgendorf; Sonia Ancoli-Israel Journal: Psychooncology Date: 2014-05-02 Impact factor: 3.894
Authors: Heather Greenlee; Melissa J DuPont-Reyes; Lynda G Balneaves; Linda E Carlson; Misha R Cohen; Gary Deng; Jillian A Johnson; Matthew Mumber; Dugald Seely; Suzanna M Zick; Lindsay M Boyce; Debu Tripathy Journal: CA Cancer J Clin Date: 2017-04-24 Impact factor: 508.702
Authors: Andrea M Barsevick; Michael R Irwin; Pamela Hinds; Andrew Miller; Ann Berger; Paul Jacobsen; Sonia Ancoli-Israel; Bryce B Reeve; Karen Mustian; Ann O'Mara; Jin-Shei Lai; Michael Fisch; David Cella Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2013-09-18 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Tracy D Vannorsdall; Ermiece Straub; Christina Saba; Mallory Blackwood; Jingyi Zhang; Keren Stearns; Karen Lisa Smith Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2020-10-21 Impact factor: 3.603