Literature DB >> 21660453

The coping flexibility questionnaire: development and initial validation in patients with chronic rheumatic diseases.

Johanna E Vriezekolk1, Wim G J M van Lankveld, Agnes M M Eijsbouts, Toon van Helmond, Rinie Geenen, Cornelia H M van den Ende.   

Abstract

Coping flexibility may be beneficial for the adjustment in the context of a progressive and unpredictable course of chronic rheumatic diseases. The aim of this study was to develop and initially validate a self-report measure that assesses coping flexibility. Study participants were 147 outpatients with chronic rheumatic diseases (73% women, mean age 59 (range 20-79) years). Principal axis factoring analysis with oblique rotation was applied and internal consistency was determined. To investigate the initial validity of the coping flexibility questionnaire (COFLEX), hypothesised correlations with psychological and physical adjustment outcomes, pain, and coping strategies were examined. Factor analysis yielded a two-factor model of coping flexibility with acceptable internal consistency: versatility, the capability of switching between assimilative and accommodative coping strategies according to personal goals and situational demands (α = .88) and reflective coping, the capability of generating and considering coping options, and appraising the suitability of a coping strategy in a given situation (α = .70). Versatility was correlated with adaptive ways of coping and psychological adjustment, but not with physical adjustment and pain. Reflective coping was correlated with both adaptive and maladaptive ways of coping, but it was not correlated with adjustment outcomes. In conclusion, the current study suggests acceptable internal consistency of the COFLEX. Preliminary evidence of the validity of the versatility dimension is indicated, while the validity of reflective coping could not be firmly established. The associations of versatility with favourable adjustment to the disease warrant future confirmatory and validity research in larger samples of patients with chronic rheumatic diseases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21660453     DOI: 10.1007/s00296-011-1975-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rheumatol Int        ISSN: 0172-8172            Impact factor:   2.631


  22 in total

Review 1.  Coping: pitfalls and promise.

Authors:  Susan Folkman; Judith Tedlie Moskowitz
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 24.137

2.  The importance of being flexible: the ability to both enhance and suppress emotional expression predicts long-term adjustment.

Authors:  George A Bonanno; Anthony Papa; Kathleen Lalande; Maren Westphal; Karin Coifman
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2004-07

3.  A power primer.

Authors:  J Cohen
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 17.737

4.  Coping with chronic pain: flexible goal adjustment as an interactive buffer against pain-related distress.

Authors:  Ulrich Schmitz; Helmut Saile; Paul Nilges
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 6.961

5.  Self-reported coping behavior in health and disease: assessment with a card sort game.

Authors:  C E Schwartz; C K Peng; N Lester; L H Daltroy; A L Goldberger
Journal:  Behav Med       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 3.104

6.  Psychometric properties of a Dutch short form of the Arthritis Impact Measurement Scales 2 (Dutch-AIMS2-SF).

Authors:  E Taal; J J Rasker; R P Riemsma
Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 7.580

Review 7.  Coping theory and research: past, present, and future.

Authors:  R S Lazarus
Journal:  Psychosom Med       Date:  1993 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.312

8.  Beyond unfavorable thinking: the illness cognition questionnaire for chronic diseases.

Authors:  A W Evers; F W Kraaimaat; W van Lankveld; P J Jongen; J W Jacobs; J W Bijlsma
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  2001-12

9.  Who can afford to look to the future? The relationship between socio-economic status and proactive coping.

Authors:  Carolijn Ouwehand; Denise T D de Ridder; Jozien M Bensing
Journal:  Eur J Public Health       Date:  2009-04-23       Impact factor: 3.367

10.  Use of the Coping Inventory for Stressful Situations in a clinically depressed sample: factor structure, personality correlates, and prediction of distress.

Authors:  Lachlan A McWilliams; Brian J Cox; Murray W Enns
Journal:  J Clin Psychol       Date:  2003-04
View more
  13 in total

1.  Inflexibility as a Vulnerability to Depression: A Systematic Qualitative Review.

Authors:  Jonathan P Stange; Lauren B Alloy; David M Fresco
Journal:  Clin Psychol (New York)       Date:  2017-06-13

2.  Effects of Flexibility in Coping with Chronic Headaches on Depressive Symptoms.

Authors:  Tsukasa Kato
Journal:  Int J Behav Med       Date:  2015-08

3.  The potential buffering role of self-efficacy and pain acceptance against invalidation in rheumatic diseases.

Authors:  Nigel Cameron; Marianne Kool; Fernando Estévez-López; Isabel López-Chicheri; Rinie Geenen
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2017-10-30       Impact factor: 2.631

4.  The revised Bristol Rheumatoid Arthritis Fatigue measures and the Rheumatoid Arthritis Impact of Disease scale: validation in six countries.

Authors:  Sarah Hewlett; John Kirwan; Christina Bode; Fiona Cramp; Loreto Carmona; Emma Dures; Matthias Englbrecht; Jaap Fransen; Rosemary Greenwood; Sofia Hagel; Maart van de Laar; Anna Molto; Joanna Nicklin; Ingemar F Petersson; Marta Redondo; Georg Schett; Laure Gossec
Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 7.580

5.  Cognitive Control and Flexibility in the Context of Stress and Depressive Symptoms: The Cognitive Control and Flexibility Questionnaire.

Authors:  Robert L Gabrys; Nassim Tabri; Hymie Anisman; Kimberly Matheson
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-11-19

6.  Examination of the Coping Flexibility Hypothesis Using the Coping Flexibility Scale-Revised.

Authors:  Tsukasa Kato
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2020-12-11

7.  A goal management intervention for polyarthritis patients: rationale and design of a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Roos Y Arends; Christina Bode; Erik Taal; Mart A F J Van de Laar
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2013-08-13       Impact factor: 2.362

8.  Exploring preferences for domain-specific goal management in patients with polyarthritis: what to do when an important goal becomes threatened?

Authors:  Roos Y Arends; Christina Bode; Erik Taal; Mart A F J Van de Laar
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2015-08-12       Impact factor: 2.631

9.  Serendipity in Relationship: A Tentative Theory of the Cognitive Process of Yuanfen and Its Psychological Constructs in Chinese Cultural Societies.

Authors:  Hsin-Ping Hsu; Kwang-Kuo Hwang
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-03-01

10.  Discriminative validity of the Core outcome set functional independence in a population of older adults.

Authors:  Yvonne J C Dockx; Esther A L M Molenaar; Di-Janne J A Barten; Cindy Veenhof
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2020-08-26       Impact factor: 3.921

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.