Literature DB >> 21660418

Focused preoperative patient stoma education, prior to ileostomy formation after anterior resection, contributes to a reduction in delayed discharge within the enhanced recovery programme.

Jenan Younis1, Gisella Salerno, Daniela Fanto, Marios Hadjipavlou, Daniel Chellar, Jonathan P Trickett.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Stoma formation is a well-known cause for delayed discharge following colorectal surgery. This has been addressed by the enhanced recovery programme (ERP) preoperatively through stoma counselling sessions. These aim to promote independent stoma management post-operatively, thus expediting hospital discharge. We compared the numbers of patients with prolonged hospital stay secondary to delayed independent stoma management prior to and following the introduction of an enhanced recovery programme with preoperative stoma education.
METHODS: Data collection on patients undergoing anterior resection with the formation of a loop ileostomy was carried out retrospectively prior to ERP (January 2006 to August 2008) and prospectively following the introduction of ERP (September 2008 to October 2010). Comparisons were made in patients with prolonged hospital stay (defined as hospital stay of more than 5 days) secondary to stoma management.
RESULTS: Two hundred forty patients underwent elective anterior resection with the formation of a loop ileostomy, 120 prior ERP and 120 post-ERP. Average length of hospital stay was 14 days before ERP introduction, with a range of 7-25 days. The mean length of stay amongst the ERP patients was 8 days (p = 0.17), ranging from 3 to 17 days. Twenty-one patients in the pre-ERP group (17.5%) experienced postponed hospital discharge due to a delay in independent stoma management, compared to one patient experiencing such a delay after the introduction of ERP (0.8%, p < 0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS: Delayed discharge secondary to independent stoma management can be significantly reduced with preoperative stoma management teaching as part of an enhanced recovery programme.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21660418     DOI: 10.1007/s00384-011-1252-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis        ISSN: 0179-1958            Impact factor:   2.571


  23 in total

Review 1.  Anaesthesia, surgery, and challenges in postoperative recovery.

Authors:  Henrik Kehlet; Jørgen B Dahl
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2003-12-06       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Impact of an enhanced recovery programme in colorectal surgery.

Authors:  Rebecca Slater
Journal:  Br J Nurs       Date:  2010 Sep 23-Oct 13

3.  Randomized clinical trial comparing laparoscopic and open surgery for colorectal cancer within an enhanced recovery programme.

Authors:  P M King; J M Blazeby; P Ewings; P J Franks; R J Longman; A H Kendrick; R M Kipling; R H Kennedy
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 6.939

4.  Diverting stoma after low anterior resection: more arguments in favor.

Authors:  Alexis B Ulrich; Christoph Seiler; Nuh Rahbari; Jürgen Weitz; Markus W Büchler
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 4.585

Review 5.  Bodily change following faecal stoma formation: qualitative interpretive synthesis.

Authors:  Gabrielle Thorpe; Margaret McArthur; Barbara Richardson
Journal:  J Adv Nurs       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 3.187

Review 6.  Living with a stoma: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Hannah Brown; Jacqueline Randle
Journal:  J Clin Nurs       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 3.036

7.  Coping styles of older adults with ostomies.

Authors:  Sheila Normand Reynaud; Bonnie Juve' Meeker
Journal:  J Gerontol Nurs       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 1.254

8.  Ileostomy formation does not prolong hospital length of stay after open anterior resection when performed within an enhanced recovery programme.

Authors:  S Hignett; C D Parmar; W Lewis; C A Makin; C J Walsh
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2010-07-23       Impact factor: 3.788

9.  Impact of colorectal cancer on patient and family: implications for care.

Authors:  Hortense Cotrim; Graça Pereira
Journal:  Eur J Oncol Nurs       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 2.398

10.  A cohort study of results following elective colonic and rectal resection within an enhanced recovery programme.

Authors:  O Faiz; T Brown; G Colucci; R H Kennedy
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2009-07-09       Impact factor: 3.788

View more
  15 in total

1.  Enhanced recovery strategies in colorectal surgery: is the compliance with the whole program required to achieve the target?

Authors:  Luca Gianotti; Simone Beretta; Margherita Luperto; Davide Bernasconi; Maria Grazia Valsecchi; Marco Braga
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2013-12-13       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Clinical practice guideline for enhanced recovery after colon and rectal surgery from the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons (ASCRS) and Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES).

Authors:  Joseph C Carmichael; Deborah S Keller; Gabriele Baldini; Liliana Bordeianou; Eric Weiss; Lawrence Lee; Marylise Boutros; James McClane; Scott R Steele; Liane S Feldman
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-08-03       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Guidelines for perioperative care in elective rectal/pelvic surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS(®)) Society recommendations.

Authors:  J Nygren; J Thacker; F Carli; K C H Fearon; S Norderval; D N Lobo; O Ljungqvist; M Soop; J Ramirez
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Laparoscopic-assisted versus open total mesorectal excision with anal sphincter preservation for mid and low rectal cancer: a prospective, randomized trial.

Authors:  Simon S M Ng; Janet F Y Lee; Raymond Y C Yiu; Jimmy C M Li; Sophie S F Hon; Tony W C Mak; Dennis K Y Ngo; Wing Wa Leung; Ka Lau Leung
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-09-07       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Patient autonomy-centered self-care checklist reduces hospital readmissions after ileostomy creation.

Authors:  Karin M Hardiman; Christina D Reames; Marshall C McLeod; Scott E Regenbogen
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2016-06-16       Impact factor: 3.982

Review 6.  Implementation of an ERAS Pathway in Colorectal Surgery.

Authors:  Paul Cavallaro; Liliana Bordeianou
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2019-02-28

7.  The effect of preoperative stoma training for patients undergoing colorectal surgery in an enhanced recovery programme.

Authors:  M J Hughes; W Cunningham; S Yalamarthi
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2019-12-16       Impact factor: 1.891

8.  Factors associated with hospital readmission following diverting ileostomy creation.

Authors:  W Li; L Stocchi; D Cherla; G Liu; A Agostinelli; C P Delaney; S R Steele; E Gorgun
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2017-08-17       Impact factor: 3.781

Review 9.  Avoidance and management of stomal complications.

Authors:  Michael Kwiatt; Michitaka Kawata
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2013-06

10.  Diverting ileostomy during primary debulking surgery for ovarian cancer: Associated factors and postoperative outcomes.

Authors:  Jill H Tseng; Rudy S Suidan; Oliver Zivanovic; Ginger J Gardner; Yukio Sonoda; Douglas A Levine; Nadeem R Abu-Rustum; William P Tew; Dennis S Chi; Kara Long Roche
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2016-06-04       Impact factor: 5.482

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.