OBJECTIVE: We have reported that implementation of an electronic health record (EHR) based quality improvement system that included point-of-care electronic reminders accelerated improvement in performance for multiple measures of chronic disease care and preventive care during a 1-year period. This study examined whether providing pre-visit paper quality reminders could further improve performance, especially for physicians whose performance had not improved much during the first year. DESIGN: Time-series analysis at a large internal medicine practice using a commercial EHR. All patients eligible for each measure were included (range approximately 100-7500). MEASUREMENTS: The proportion of eligible patients in the practice who satisfied each of 15 quality measures after removing those with exceptions from the denominator. To analyze changes in performance for individual physicians, two composite measures were used: prescribing seven essential medications and completion of five preventive services. RESULTS: During the year after implementing pre-encounter reminders, performance continued to improve for eight measures, remained stable for four, and declined for three. Physicians with the worst performance at the start of the pre-encounter reminders showed little absolute improvement over the next year, and most remained below the median performance for physicians in the practice. CONCLUSIONS: Paper pre-encounter reminders did not appear to improve performance beyond electronic point-of-care reminders in the EHR alone. Lagging performance is likely not due to providers' EHR workflow alone, and trying to step backwards and use paper reminders in addition to point-of-care reminders in the EHR may not be an effective strategy for engaging slow adopters.
OBJECTIVE: We have reported that implementation of an electronic health record (EHR) based quality improvement system that included point-of-care electronic reminders accelerated improvement in performance for multiple measures of chronic disease care and preventive care during a 1-year period. This study examined whether providing pre-visit paper quality reminders could further improve performance, especially for physicians whose performance had not improved much during the first year. DESIGN: Time-series analysis at a large internal medicine practice using a commercial EHR. All patients eligible for each measure were included (range approximately 100-7500). MEASUREMENTS: The proportion of eligible patients in the practice who satisfied each of 15 quality measures after removing those with exceptions from the denominator. To analyze changes in performance for individual physicians, two composite measures were used: prescribing seven essential medications and completion of five preventive services. RESULTS: During the year after implementing pre-encounter reminders, performance continued to improve for eight measures, remained stable for four, and declined for three. Physicians with the worst performance at the start of the pre-encounter reminders showed little absolute improvement over the next year, and most remained below the median performance for physicians in the practice. CONCLUSIONS: Paper pre-encounter reminders did not appear to improve performance beyond electronic point-of-care reminders in the EHR alone. Lagging performance is likely not due to providers' EHR workflow alone, and trying to step backwards and use paper reminders in addition to point-of-care reminders in the EHR may not be an effective strategy for engaging slow adopters.
Authors: Eve A Kerr; Dylan M Smith; Mary M Hogan; Sarah L Krein; Leonard Pogach; Timothy P Hofer; Rodney A Hayward Journal: Jt Comm J Qual Improv Date: 2002-10
Authors: Basit Chaudhry; Jerome Wang; Shinyi Wu; Margaret Maglione; Walter Mojica; Elizabeth Roth; Sally C Morton; Paul G Shekelle Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2006-04-11 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Paul C Tang; Mary Ralston; Michelle Fernandez Arrigotti; Lubna Qureshi; Justin Graham Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2006-10-26 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Thomas D Sequist; Tejal K Gandhi; Andrew S Karson; Julie M Fiskio; Donald Bugbee; Michael Sperling; E Francis Cook; E John Orav; David G Fairchild; David W Bates Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2005-03-31 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Stephen D Persell; Darren Kaiser; Nancy C Dolan; Beth Andrews; Sue Levi; Janardan Khandekar; Thomas Gavagan; Jason A Thompson; Elisha M Friesema; David W Baker Journal: Med Care Date: 2011-02 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: Erin G Stone; Sally C Morton; Marlies E Hulscher; Margaret A Maglione; Elizabeth A Roth; Jeremy M Grimshaw; Brian S Mittman; Lisa V Rubenstein; Laurence Z Rubenstein; Paul G Shekelle Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2002-05-07 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Leroi S Hicks; Thomas D Sequist; John Z Ayanian; Shimon Shaykevich; David G Fairchild; E John Orav; David W Bates Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2008-04 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: David W Baker; Tiffany Brown; Ji Young Lee; Amanda Ozanich; David T Liss; Diana S Sandler; Eric M Ruderman Journal: J Rheumatol Date: 2016-04-15 Impact factor: 4.666
Authors: Deepti Shanbhag; Ian D Graham; Karen Harlos; R Brian Haynes; Itzhak Gabizon; Stuart J Connolly; Harriette Gillian Christine Van Spall Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2018-03-06 Impact factor: 2.692