Literature DB >> 21658943

Cohesion fatigue induces chromatid separation in cells delayed at metaphase.

John R Daum1, Tamara A Potapova, Sushama Sivakumar, Jeremy J Daniel, Jennifer N Flynn, Susannah Rankin, Gary J Gorbsky.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Chromosome instability is thought to be a major contributor to cancer malignancy and birth defects. For balanced chromosome segregation in mitosis, kinetochores on sister chromatids bind and pull on microtubules emanating from opposite spindle poles. This tension contributes to the correction of improper kinetochore attachments and is opposed by the cohesin complex that holds the sister chromatids together. Normally, within minutes of alignment at the metaphase plate, chromatid cohesion is released, allowing each cohort of chromatids to move synchronously to opposite poles in anaphase, an event closely coordinated with mitotic exit.
RESULTS: Here we show that during experimentally induced metaphase delay, spindle pulling forces can cause asynchronous chromatid separation, a phenomenon we term "cohesion fatigue." Cohesion fatigue is not blocked by inhibition of Plk1, a kinase essential for the "prophase pathway" of cohesin release from chromosomes, or by depletion of separase, the protease that normally drives chromatid separation at anaphase. Cohesion fatigue is inhibited by drug-induced depolymerization of mitotic spindle microtubules and by experimentally increasing the levels of cohesin on mitotic chromosomes. In cells undergoing cohesion fatigue, cohesin proteins remain associated with the separated chromatids.
CONCLUSION: In cells arrested at metaphase, pulling forces originating from kinetochore-microtubule interactions can, with time, rupture normal sister chromatid cohesion. This cohesion fatigue, resulting in unscheduled chromatid separation in cells delayed at metaphase, constitutes a previously overlooked source for chromosome instability in mitosis and meiosis.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21658943      PMCID: PMC3119564          DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2011.05.032

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Biol        ISSN: 0960-9822            Impact factor:   10.834


  34 in total

1.  The dissociation of cohesin from chromosomes in prophase is regulated by Polo-like kinase.

Authors:  Izabela Sumara; Elisabeth Vorlaufer; P Todd Stukenberg; Olaf Kelm; Norbert Redemann; Erich A Nigg; Jan-Michael Peters
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 17.970

2.  The Schizosaccharomyces pombe spindle checkpoint protein mad2p blocks anaphase and genetically interacts with the anaphase-promoting complex.

Authors:  X He; T E Patterson; S Sazer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1997-07-22       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Human Wapl is a cohesin-binding protein that promotes sister-chromatid resolution in mitotic prophase.

Authors:  Rita Gandhi; Peter J Gillespie; Tatsuya Hirano
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2006-11-16       Impact factor: 10.834

4.  Spindle pole fragmentation due to proteasome inhibition.

Authors:  Anka G Ehrhardt; Greenfield Sluder
Journal:  J Cell Physiol       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 6.384

5.  Chromatid cohesion defects may underlie chromosome instability in human colorectal cancers.

Authors:  Thomas D Barber; Kirk McManus; Karen W Y Yuen; Marcelo Reis; Giovanni Parmigiani; Dong Shen; Irene Barrett; Yasaman Nouhi; Forrest Spencer; Sanford Markowitz; Victor E Velculescu; Kenneth W Kinzler; Bert Vogelstein; Christoph Lengauer; Philip Hieter
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-02-25       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Mad2 overexpression promotes aneuploidy and tumorigenesis in mice.

Authors:  Rocío Sotillo; Eva Hernando; Elena Díaz-Rodríguez; Julie Teruya-Feldstein; Carlos Cordón-Cardo; Scott W Lowe; Robert Benezra
Journal:  Cancer Cell       Date:  2006-12-28       Impact factor: 31.743

7.  The small-molecule inhibitor BI 2536 reveals novel insights into mitotic roles of polo-like kinase 1.

Authors:  Péter Lénárt; Mark Petronczki; Martin Steegmaier; Barbara Di Fiore; Jesse J Lipp; Matthias Hoffmann; Wolfgang J Rettig; Norbert Kraut; Jan-Michael Peters
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2007-02-08       Impact factor: 10.834

8.  The reversibility of mitotic exit in vertebrate cells.

Authors:  Tamara A Potapova; John R Daum; Bradley D Pittman; Joanna R Hudson; Tara N Jones; David L Satinover; P Todd Stukenberg; Gary J Gorbsky
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2006-04-13       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Vertebrate shugoshin links sister centromere cohesion and kinetochore microtubule stability in mitosis.

Authors:  Adrian Salic; Jennifer C Waters; Timothy J Mitchison
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2004-09-03       Impact factor: 41.582

10.  Regulation of sister chromatid cohesion between chromosome arms.

Authors:  Juan F Giménez-Abián; Izabela Sumara; Toru Hirota; Silke Hauf; Daniel Gerlich; Consuelo de la Torre; Jan Ellenberg; Jan-Michael Peters
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2004-07-13       Impact factor: 10.834

View more
  93 in total

1.  CLASPs prevent irreversible multipolarity by ensuring spindle-pole resistance to traction forces during chromosome alignment.

Authors:  Elsa Logarinho; Stefano Maffini; Marin Barisic; Andrea Marques; Alberto Toso; Patrick Meraldi; Helder Maiato
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2012-02-05       Impact factor: 28.824

Review 2.  RB: mitotic implications of a tumour suppressor.

Authors:  Amity L Manning; Nicholas J Dyson
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2012-02-09       Impact factor: 60.716

3.  Chromothripsis: breakage-fusion-bridge over and over again.

Authors:  Carlos Oscar Sánchez Sorzano; Alberto Pascual-Montano; Ainhoa Sánchez de Diego; Carlos Martínez-A; Karel H M van Wely
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2013-06-11       Impact factor: 4.534

4.  Low-dose laulimalide represents a novel molecular probe for investigating microtubule organization.

Authors:  Melissa J Bennett; Gordon K Chan; J B Rattner; David C Schriemer
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2012-08-08       Impact factor: 4.534

Review 5.  Sister chromatid segregation in meiosis II: deprotection through phosphorylation.

Authors:  Katja Wassmann
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2013-04-10       Impact factor: 4.534

6.  A kinase-dependent role for Haspin in antagonizing Wapl and protecting mitotic centromere cohesion.

Authors:  Cai Liang; Qinfu Chen; Qi Yi; Miao Zhang; Haiyan Yan; Bo Zhang; Linli Zhou; Zhenlei Zhang; Feifei Qi; Sheng Ye; Fangwei Wang
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2017-11-14       Impact factor: 8.807

7.  A direct role of Mad1 in the spindle assembly checkpoint beyond Mad2 kinetochore recruitment.

Authors:  Thomas Kruse; Marie Sofie Yoo Larsen; Garry G Sedgwick; Jón Otti Sigurdsson; Werner Streicher; Jesper V Olsen; Jakob Nilsson
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2014-01-29       Impact factor: 8.807

Review 8.  Mitotic spindle multipolarity without centrosome amplification.

Authors:  Helder Maiato; Elsa Logarinho
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 28.824

9.  Esco1 and Esco2 regulate distinct cohesin functions during cell cycle progression.

Authors:  Reem M Alomer; Eulália M L da Silva; Jingrong Chen; Katarzyna M Piekarz; Katherine McDonald; Courtney G Sansam; Christopher L Sansam; Susannah Rankin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-08-28       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 10.  Cohesin Mutations in Cancer.

Authors:  Magali De Koninck; Ana Losada
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 6.915

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.