Literature DB >> 21658786

Can procalcitonin predict bone infection in people with diabetes with infected foot ulcers? A pilot study.

Mesut Mutluoğlu1, Günalp Uzun, Osman M İpcioğlu, Onur Sildiroglu, Ömer Özcan, Vedat Turhan, Hakan Mutlu, Senol Yildiz.   

Abstract

AIMS: The diagnosis of osteomyelitis is a key step of diabetic foot management. Previous studies showed that procalcitonin (PCT), a novel infection marker, is superior to conventional infection markers in the diagnosis of diabetic foot infection. This study aimed to investigate the serum levels of PCT and other conventional infection markers in diabetic persons with and without osteomyelitis.
METHODS: Twenty-four patients (18 male, mean age: 61.9±10.8 years) with infected foot ulcers were prospectively enrolled. Clinical characteristics of the wounds were noted. Blood samples were obtained for biochemical analysis. Magnetic resonance imaging of the foot was performed in all patients to diagnose osteomyelitis.
RESULTS: Osteomyelitis was found in 13 of 24 (54%) patients. PCT levels were 66.7±43.5 pg/ml in patients with osteomyelitis and 58.6±35.5 pg/ml in patients without osteomyelitis. The difference did not reach statistical significance (p=0.627). Erythrocyte sedimentation rate, but not C-reactive protein and white blood cell count, was found significantly higher in patients with osteomyelitis.
CONCLUSION: In this group of patients, PCT failed to discriminate patients with bone infection. Erythrocyte sedimentation rate can be used as a marker of osteomyelitis in diabetic persons.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21658786     DOI: 10.1016/j.diabres.2011.05.023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabetes Res Clin Pract        ISSN: 0168-8227            Impact factor:   5.602


  6 in total

1.  The value of inflammatory markers to diagnose and monitor diabetic foot osteomyelitis.

Authors:  Suzanne Av Van Asten; Adam Nichols; Javier La Fontaine; Kavita Bhavan; Edgar Jg Peters; Lawrence A Lavery
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2015-12-03       Impact factor: 3.315

Review 2.  Osteomyelitis or Charcot neuro-osteoarthropathy? Differentiating these disorders in diabetic patients with a foot problem.

Authors:  Bulent M Ertugrul; Benjamin A Lipsky; Oner Savk
Journal:  Diabet Foot Ankle       Date:  2013-11-05

Review 3.  Diagnosing diabetic foot osteomyelitis: narrative review and a suggested 2-step score-based diagnostic pathway for clinicians.

Authors:  Anurag Markanday
Journal:  Open Forum Infect Dis       Date:  2014-08-07       Impact factor: 3.835

4.  The efficacy of inflammatory markers in diagnosing infected diabetic foot ulcers and diabetic foot osteomyelitis: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Harman Sharma; Sandhli Sharma; Anirudh Krishnan; Daniel Yuan; Venkat N Vangaveti; Usman H Malabu; Nagaraja Haleagrahara
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-04-27       Impact factor: 3.752

5.  Can Ratio of Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Count and Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate in Diabetic Foot Infecti on Predict Osteomyelitis and/or Amputation?

Authors:  Oktay Yapıcı; Hande Berk; Nefise Öztoprak; Derya Seyman; Alper Tahmaz; Alparslan Merdin
Journal:  Hematol Rep       Date:  2017-02-23

Review 6.  Recommendations for the treatment of osteomyelitis.

Authors:  Ana Lucia L Lima; Priscila R Oliveira; Vladimir C Carvalho; Sergio Cimerman; Eduardo Savio
Journal:  Braz J Infect Dis       Date:  2014-04-01       Impact factor: 3.257

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.