Literature DB >> 21658562

Reverse remodeling and the risk of ventricular tachyarrhythmias in the MADIT-CRT (Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial-Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy).

Alon Barsheshet1, Paul J Wang, Arthur J Moss, Scott D Solomon, Amin Al-Ahmad, Scott McNitt, Elyse Foster, David T Huang, Helmut U Klein, Wojciech Zareba, Michael Eldar, Ilan Goldenberg.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: We aimed to evaluate the relationship between echocardiographic response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) and the risk of subsequent ventricular tachyarrhythmias (VTAs).
BACKGROUND: Current data regarding the effect of CRT on the risk of VTA are limited and conflicting.
METHODS: The risk of a first appropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapy for VTA (including ventricular tachycardia, ventricular fibrillation, and ventricular flutter) was compared between high- and low-echocardiographic responders to CRT defibrillator (CRT-D) therapy (defined as ≥ 25% and <25% reductions, respectively, in left ventricular end-systolic volume [LVESV] at 1 year compared with baseline) and ICD-only patients enrolled in the MADIT-CRT (Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial-Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy).
RESULTS: The cumulative probability of a first VTA at 2 years after assessment of echocardiographic response was highest among low responders to CRT-D (28%), intermediate among ICD-only patients (21%), and lowest among high responders to CRT-D (12%), with p < 0.001 for the overall difference during follow-up. Multivariate analysis showed that high responders to CRT-D experienced a significant 55% reduction in the risk of VTA compared with ICD-only patients (p < 0.001), whereas the risk of VTA was not significantly different between low responders and ICD-only patients (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.26; p = 0.21). Consistently, assessment of response to CRT-D as a continuous measure showed that incremental 10% reductions in left ventricular end-systolic volume were associated with corresponding reductions in the risk of subsequent VTA (HR: 0.80; p < 0.001), VTA/death (HR: 0.79; p < 0.001), ventricular tachycardia (HR: 0.80; p < 0.001), and ventricular fibrillation/ventricular flutter (HR: 0.75; p = 0.044).
CONCLUSIONS: In patients with left ventricular dysfunction enrolled in the MADIT-CRT trial, reverse remodeling was associated with a significant reduction in the risk of subsequent life-threatening VTAs. (Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial-Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy [MADIT-CRT]; NCT00180271).
Copyright © 2011 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21658562     DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2010.12.041

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  41 in total

Review 1.  The emerging role of cardiac resynchronization therapy in milder heart failure: are we implanting too late for response?

Authors:  Jason Bradfield; Noel G Boyle; Ravi Mandapati; Kalyanam Shivkumar
Journal:  Curr Heart Fail Rep       Date:  2012-03

Review 2.  Roles and indications for use of implantable defibrillator and resynchronization therapy in the prevention of sudden cardiac death in heart failure.

Authors:  Yitschak Biton; Jayson R Baman; Bronislava Polonsky
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 4.214

3.  Cardiac mechano-electric coupling: a role in regulating normal function of the heart?

Authors:  T Alexander Quinn
Journal:  Cardiovasc Res       Date:  2015-07-24       Impact factor: 10.787

4.  Predictors and long-term outcome of super-responders to cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Abdul Ghani; Peter Paul H M Delnoy; Ahmet Adiyaman; Jan Paul Ottervanger; Anand R Ramdat Misier; Jaap Jan J Smit; Arif Elvan
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2017-03-14       Impact factor: 2.882

5.  Successful extracorporeal membrane oxygenation weaning after cardiac resynchronization therapy device implantation in a patient with end-stage heart failure.

Authors:  Simon Pecha; Yalin Yildirim; Hermann Reichenspurner; Tobias Deuse
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2012-07-30

6.  Outcomes After Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Generator Replacement for Primary Prevention of Sudden Cardiac Death.

Authors:  Malini Madhavan; Jonathan W Waks; Paul A Friedman; Daniel B Kramer; Alfred E Buxton; Peter A Noseworthy; Ramila A Mehta; David O Hodge; Angela Y Higgins; Tracy L Webster; Chance M Witt; Yong-Mei Cha; Bernard J Gersh
Journal:  Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol       Date:  2016-03

Review 7.  Structural and Physiological Imaging to Predict the Risk of Lethal Ventricular Arrhythmias and Sudden Death.

Authors:  Saurabh Malhotra; John M Canty
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2019-10

Review 8.  Enhancing Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy for Patients with Atrial Fibrillation: The Role of AV Node Ablation.

Authors:  Jeff M Berry; Jose AJoglar
Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation       Date:  2012-04-14

Review 9.  Arrhythmias in Patients ≥80 Years of Age: Pathophysiology, Management, and Outcomes.

Authors:  Anne B Curtis; Roshan Karki; Alexander Hattoum; Umesh C Sharma
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2018-05-08       Impact factor: 24.094

10.  Effect of cardiac resynchronization therapy on the risk of ventricular tachyarrhythmias in patients with chronic kidney disease.

Authors:  Usama A Daimee; Yitschak Biton; Arthur J Moss; Wojciech Zareba; David Cannom; Helmut Klein; Scott Solomon; Martin H Ruwald; Scott McNitt; Bronislava Polonsky; Paul J Wang; Ilan Goldenberg; Valentina Kutyifa
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2016-09-15       Impact factor: 1.468

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.