AIM: This study was performed: 1) to assess the relationship between blood flow velocity in the internal carotid artery (CBF(ICA)) and pial artery pulsation (cc-TQ) and 2) to evaluate flow-induced changes in pial artery compliance. METHODS: Experiments were performed on 10 crossbred male rabbits. Heart rate (HR), blood pressure (BP), left ventricle ejection fraction (LVEF), CBF(ICA), the systolic-diastolic blood volume fraction in the brain circulation (CBF(SDF)) and cc-TQ were recorded after glucagon and acetazolamide administration. cc-TQ was measured with near-infrared transillumination back scattering sounding (NIR-T/BSS), LVEF and CBF(SDF) with gated scintigraphy and BP and CBF(ICA) with electromagnetic pressure and flow transducers, respectively. Doses of drugs were chosen to exert a haemodynamic effect but not change BP or intracranial pressure. RESULTS: Acetazolamide and glucagon evoked significant increases in cc-TQ, CBF(SDF), CBF(ICA), LVEF and HR. The following interdependencies were found: 1) changes after acetazolamide administration compared to baseline: CBF(SDF) vs. LVEF (r=0.73, p<0.05), cc-TQ vs. CBF(SDF) (r=-0.67, p<0.05), cc-TQ vs. LVEF (r=-0.76, p<0.05), 2) changes after glucagon administration compared to baseline: CBF(ICA) vs. BP (r=0.73, p<0.05), CBF(SDF) vs. LVEF (r=0.87, p<0.05), cc-TQ vs. HR (r=0.85, p<0.05), cc-TQ vs. CBF(ICA) (r=-0.74, p<0.05). CONCLUSION: In the absence of systemic BP changes, pial arteries are significantly affected by changes in CBF(ICA). Pial arteries counteract changes in CBF(ICA) and CBF(SDF). The ability of pial arteries to stabilise CBF(ICA) is impaired after acetazolamide administration. Changes in cardiac output directly affect the brain's microcirculation. NIR-T/BSS recordings allow for non-invasive assessment of changes in pial artery compliance.
AIM: This study was performed: 1) to assess the relationship between blood flow velocity in the internal carotid artery (CBF(ICA)) and pial artery pulsation (cc-TQ) and 2) to evaluate flow-induced changes in pial artery compliance. METHODS: Experiments were performed on 10 crossbred male rabbits. Heart rate (HR), blood pressure (BP), left ventricle ejection fraction (LVEF), CBF(ICA), the systolic-diastolic blood volume fraction in the brain circulation (CBF(SDF)) and cc-TQ were recorded after glucagon and acetazolamide administration. cc-TQ was measured with near-infrared transillumination back scattering sounding (NIR-T/BSS), LVEF and CBF(SDF) with gated scintigraphy and BP and CBF(ICA) with electromagnetic pressure and flow transducers, respectively. Doses of drugs were chosen to exert a haemodynamic effect but not change BP or intracranial pressure. RESULTS:Acetazolamide and glucagon evoked significant increases in cc-TQ, CBF(SDF), CBF(ICA), LVEF and HR. The following interdependencies were found: 1) changes after acetazolamide administration compared to baseline: CBF(SDF) vs. LVEF (r=0.73, p<0.05), cc-TQ vs. CBF(SDF) (r=-0.67, p<0.05), cc-TQ vs. LVEF (r=-0.76, p<0.05), 2) changes after glucagon administration compared to baseline: CBF(ICA) vs. BP (r=0.73, p<0.05), CBF(SDF) vs. LVEF (r=0.87, p<0.05), cc-TQ vs. HR (r=0.85, p<0.05), cc-TQ vs. CBF(ICA) (r=-0.74, p<0.05). CONCLUSION: In the absence of systemic BP changes, pial arteries are significantly affected by changes in CBF(ICA). Pial arteries counteract changes in CBF(ICA) and CBF(SDF). The ability of pial arteries to stabilise CBF(ICA) is impaired after acetazolamide administration. Changes in cardiac output directly affect the brain's microcirculation. NIR-T/BSS recordings allow for non-invasive assessment of changes in pial artery compliance.
Authors: Magdalena K Nuckowska; Marcin Gruszecki; Jacek Kot; Jacek Wolf; Wojciech Guminski; Andrzej F Frydrychowski; Jerzy Wtorek; Krzysztof Narkiewicz; Pawel J Winklewski Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2019-04-17 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Andrzej F Frydrychowski; Pawel J Winklewski; Arkadiusz Szarmach; Grzegorz Halena; Tomasz Bandurski Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-04-17 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Pawel J Winklewski; Yurii Tkachenko; Kamila Mazur; Jacek Kot; Marcin Gruszecki; Wojciech Guminski; Krzysztof Czuszynski; Jerzy Wtorek; Andrzej F Frydrychowski Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-08-18 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Pawel J Winklewski; Otto Barak; Dennis Madden; Agnieszka Gruszecka; Marcin Gruszecki; Wojciech Guminski; Jacek Kot; Andrzej F Frydrychowski; Ivan Drvis; Zeljko Dujic Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-08-18 Impact factor: 3.240