Literature DB >> 21658038

A validation study of new cryopreservation bags for implementation in a blood and marrow transplant laboratory.

Gregory J Pomper1, Emily Wilson, Scott Isom, David D Hurd.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A new cryopreservation bag for hematopoietic cell transplantation requires validation as a safe alternative to the bag currently being used in the laboratory. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: The new bag was validated using both laboratory and clinical criteria. Laboratory validation proceeded using paired samples of mononuclear cells processed using standard procedures. Cells cryopreserved in the new and old bags were compared for viability, cell counts, CD34 enumeration, colony-forming unit assays, and bag integrity. After completion of laboratory investigations, engraftment with the new bags was followed and compared to historical engraftment using the old bags.
RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the old and new bags detected using laboratory studies. Bag integrity was equivalent. The validation data suggested impaired cell function after cryopreservation in the new bags, but there were no significant differences in engraftment potential using either material. Days to engraftment was longer using the new bags, but statistical analysis revealed an association with CD34 dose and not with cryopreservation bag type.
CONCLUSION: The new bags were noninferior to the old bags. A change in cryopreservation bag type may appear to affect cell function and potentially affect engraftment. Multiple analyses may be needed to understand the effect of cell processing changes.
© 2010 American Association of Blood Banks.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21658038      PMCID: PMC3833727          DOI: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2010.02994.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transfusion        ISSN: 0041-1132            Impact factor:   3.157


  4 in total

1.  Factors predicting engraftment of autologous blood stem cells: CD34+ subsets inferior to the total CD34+ cell dose.

Authors:  D A Stewart; D Guo; J Luider; I Auer; J Klassen; E Ching; D Morris; A Chaudhry; C Brown; J A Russell
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 5.483

Review 2.  Cryopreservation of hematopoietic and non-hematopoietic stem cells.

Authors:  K K Fleming; A Hubel
Journal:  Transfus Apher Sci       Date:  2006-07-10       Impact factor: 1.764

3.  Effects of the temperature, the duration of frozen storage, and the freezing container on in vitro measurements in human peripheral blood mononuclear cells.

Authors:  C R Valeri; L E Pivacek
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 3.157

4.  Catastrophic failures of freezing bags for cellular therapy products: description, cause, and consequences.

Authors:  H M Khuu; H Cowley; V David-Ocampo; C S Carter; C Kasten-Sportes; A S Wayne; S R Solomon; M R Bishop; R M Childs; E J Read
Journal:  Cytotherapy       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 5.414

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.