Literature DB >> 21657996

Possibilities and limits of ovarian reserve testing in ART.

Antonio La Marca1, Cindy Argento, Giovanna Sighinolfi, Valentina Grisendi, Marilena Carbone, Giovanni D'Ippolito, Alfredo Carducci Artenisio, Gaspare Stabile, Annibale Volpe.   

Abstract

Markers of ovarian reserve are associated with ovarian aging as they decline with chronologic age, and hence may predict stages of reproductive aging including the menopause transition. Assessment of ovarian reserve include measurement of serum follicle stimulating hormone (FSH), anti-M�llerian hormone (AMH), and inhibin-B. Ultrasound determination of antral follicle count (AFC), ovarian vascularity and ovarian volume also can have a role. The clomiphene citrate challenge test (CCCT), exogenous FSH ovarian reserve test (EFORT), and GnRH-agonist stimulation test (GAST) are dynamic methods that have been used in the past to assess ovarian reserve. In infertile women, ovarian reserve markers can be used to predict low and high oocyte yield and treatment failure in women undergoing in vitro fertilization. However the markers may have limitations when an in depth analysis of their accuracy, cost, convenience, and utility is performed. As ovarian reserve markers may permit the identification of both the extremes of ovarian stimulation, a possible role for their measurement may be in the individualization of treatment strategies in order to reduce the clinical risk of ART along with optimized treatment burden. It is fundamental to clarify the cost/benefit of its use in the ovarian reserve testing before initiation of an IVF cycle and whether the ovarian reserve markers-determined strategy of ovarian stimulation for assisted conception may be associated to improved live birth rate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 21657996     DOI: 10.2174/138920112799361972

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Pharm Biotechnol        ISSN: 1389-2010            Impact factor:   2.837


  16 in total

1.  To what extent does Anti-Mullerian Hormone contribute to a better prediction of live birth after IVF?

Authors:  Catherine Rongieres; Carolina Colella; Philippe Lehert
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2014-11-05       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Estrogen treatment in infertile women with premature ovarian insufficiency in transitional phase: a retrospective analysis.

Authors:  Sara Pinelli; Paolo Giovanni Artini; Stefano Basile; Maria Elena Rosa Obino; Claudia Sergiampietri; Diana Giannarelli; Giovanna Simi; Vito Cela
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2017-12-05       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  A novel mathematical model of true ovarian reserve assessment based on predicted probability of poor ovarian response: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Huiyu Xu; Guoshuang Feng; Haiyan Wang; Yong Han; Rui Yang; Ying Song; Lixue Chen; Li Shi; Meng Qian Zhang; Rong Li; Jie Qiao
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2020-04-21       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 4.  Anti-Müllerian hormone as a marker of ovarian reserve: What have we learned, and what should we know?

Authors:  Akira Iwase; Tomoko Nakamura; Satoko Osuka; Sachiko Takikawa; Maki Goto; Fumitaka Kikkawa
Journal:  Reprod Med Biol       Date:  2015-11-23

5.  What number of oocytes is appropriate for defining poor ovarian response?

Authors:  Seul Ki Kim; Jung Ryeol Lee; Byung Chul Jee; Chang Suk Suh; Seok Hyun Kim
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 2.759

6.  Menstrual cycle length: a surrogate measure of reproductive health capable of improving the accuracy of biochemical/sonographical ovarian reserve test in estimating the reproductive chances of women referred to ART.

Authors:  Salvatore Gizzo; Alessandra Andrisani; Marco Noventa; Michela Quaranta; Federica Esposito; Decio Armanini; Michele Gangemi; Giovanni B Nardelli; Pietro Litta; Donato D'Antona; Guido Ambrosini
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2015-04-10       Impact factor: 5.211

7.  Circulating microRNAs in follicular fluid, powerful tools to explore in vitro fertilization process.

Authors:  E Scalici; S Traver; T Mullet; N Molinari; A Ferrières; C Brunet; S Belloc; S Hamamah
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-04-22       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Individualization of the FSH starting dose in IVF/ICSI cycles using the antral follicle count.

Authors:  Antonio La Marca; Valentina Grisendi; Simone Giulini; Cindy Argento; Alessandra Tirelli; Giulia Dondi; Enrico Papaleo; Annibale Volpe
Journal:  J Ovarian Res       Date:  2013-02-06       Impact factor: 4.234

9.  Comparison of Ovarian volume and Antral follicle count with Endocrine tests for prediction of responsiveness in ovulation induction protocols.

Authors:  Atoosa Adibi; Farahnaz Mardanian; Somaye Hajiahmadi
Journal:  Adv Biomed Res       Date:  2012-10-31

10.  Cell-free DNA in Human Follicular Microenvironment: New Prognostic Biomarker to Predict in vitro Fertilization Outcomes.

Authors:  Sabine Traver; Elodie Scalici; Tiffany Mullet; Nicolas Molinari; Claire Vincens; Tal Anahory; Samir Hamamah
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-19       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.