Literature DB >> 21657995

Genetic profile of SNP(s) and ovulation induction.

D Loutradis1, C Theofanakis, E Anagnostou, D Mavrogianni, G A Partsinevelos.   

Abstract

Obtaining an adequate number of good quality oocytes while minimizing adverse drug reactions (ADRs) and cycle cancellation rates is considered the gold standard in controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) for fertility treatment. Patients who undergo IVF/ICSI cycles tend to present with different responses to exogenous gonadotrophin administration. Research has shown that the secret probably lies in the various single nucleotide polymorhisms (SNPs) in their receptor genes. The decryption of human genome provided specialists with additional information in assessing and even predicting ovarian response to COH. In this context, the study of Pharmacogenomics, Pharmacogenetics and SNPs unravels as a promising field in optimizing fertility treatment. Several SNPs in FSH and estrogen receptor genes have been detected so far, but only three of them, one in FSH receptor and two in estrogen receptor genes have been associated with ovarian response to COH. It seems that the Asn/Ser variant of the FSH receptor functions more efficiently, while the Ser/Ser and Asn/Asn variants have a tendency to resist to FSH stimulation. With regards to estrogen receptor 1 (ESR1), the Pvull and the Xbal polymorphisms seem to be associated with differences in the response to ovarian stimulation, while the Rsal polymorphism in estrogen receptor 2 (ESR2) is currently under investigation. There exists evidence supporting the hypothesis that a set of genes, all related to the FSH hormone mechanism of action, may participate along with other factors to the control of ovarian response to FSH, thus a cautious interpretation of polymorphism detection results is considered mandatory. However, identifying potential genetic markers that could predict ovarian response and implementing them in routine screening tests for every woman entering an IVF/ICSI cycle, would be able to tailor fertility treatment to each patients needs thus maximizing the success rate and eliminating potential side-effects of fertility drugs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 21657995     DOI: 10.2174/138920112799361954

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Pharm Biotechnol        ISSN: 1389-2010            Impact factor:   2.837


  10 in total

1.  A chromosome 19 locus positively influences the number of retrieved oocytes during stimulated cycles in Brazilian women.

Authors:  Amanda Souza Setti; Sylvia Sanches Cortezzi; Rita de Cássia S Figueira; Ciro Dresch Martinhago; Daniela Paes de Almeida Ferreira Braga; Assumpto Iaconelli; Edson Borges
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2012-03-10       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 2.  The role of genetics in estrogen responses: a critical piece of an intricate puzzle.

Authors:  Emma H Wall; Sylvia C Hewitt; Laure K Case; Chin-Yo Lin; Kenneth S Korach; Cory Teuscher
Journal:  FASEB J       Date:  2014-09-11       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  An in silico model using prognostic genetic factors for ovarian response in controlled ovarian stimulation: A systematic review.

Authors:  B S Eisele; G C Villalba Silva; C Bessow; R Donato; V K Genro; J S Cunha-Filho
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2021-03-31       Impact factor: 3.357

4.  Genetic control of estrogen-regulated transcriptional and cellular responses in mouse uterus.

Authors:  Emma H Wall; Sylvia C Hewitt; Liwen Liu; Roxana del Rio; Laure K Case; Chin-Yo Lin; Kenneth S Korach; Cory Teuscher
Journal:  FASEB J       Date:  2013-01-31       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Genetic control of ductal morphology, estrogen-induced ductal growth, and gene expression in female mouse mammary gland.

Authors:  Emma H Wall; Laure K Case; Sylvia C Hewitt; Trang Nguyen-Vu; Nicholes R Candelaria; Cory Teuscher; Chin-Yo Lin
Journal:  Endocrinology       Date:  2014-04-07       Impact factor: 4.736

6.  Association between the luteinizing hormone/chorionic gonadotropin receptor (LHCGR) rs4073366 polymorphism and ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome during controlled ovarian hyperstimulation.

Authors:  Travis J O'Brien; Mariah M Kalmin; Arthur F Harralson; Adam M Clark; Ian Gindoff; Samuel J Simmens; David Frankfurter; Paul Gindoff
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2013-07-25       Impact factor: 5.211

7.  Evaluating influence of the genotypes in the follicle-stimulating hormone receptor (FSHR) Ser680Asn (rs6166) polymorphism on poor and hyper-responders to ovarian stimulation: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Noel Pabalan; Camila Martins Trevisan; Carla Peluso; Hamdi Jarjanazi; Denise Maria Christofolini; Caio Parente Barbosa; Bianca Bianco
Journal:  J Ovarian Res       Date:  2014-12-20       Impact factor: 4.234

8.  The Common Follicle-Stimulating Hormone Receptor (FSHR) Promoter Polymorphism FSHR -29G > A Affects Androgen Production in Normal Human Small Antral Follicles.

Authors:  Tanni Borgbo; Hana Klučková; Milan Macek; Jana Chrudimska; Stine Gry Kristensen; Lise Lotte Hansen; Claus Yding Andersen
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2017-06-02       Impact factor: 5.555

Review 9.  Human Chorionic Gonadotropin: The Pregnancy Hormone and More.

Authors:  Charalampos Theofanakis; Petros Drakakis; Alexandros Besharat; Dimitrios Loutradis
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2017-05-14       Impact factor: 5.923

10.  ESR1 rs9340799 is associated with endometriosis-related infertility and in vitro fertilization failure.

Authors:  Diego Davila Paskulin; João Sabino Cunha-Filho; Livia Davila Paskulin; Carlos Augusto Bastos Souza; Patricia Ashton-Prolla
Journal:  Dis Markers       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 3.434

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.