BACKGROUND: In the AZA-001 trial, azacitidine (75 mg/m(2) /d subcutaneously for Days 1-7 of every 28-day cycle) demonstrated improved survival compared with conventional care regimens in patients with International Prognostic Scoring System-defined intermediate-2- or high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome and World Health Organization-defined acute myeloid leukemia with 20% to 30% bone marrow blasts. METHODS: This secondary analysis of the AZA-001 phase 3 study evaluated the time to first response and the potential benefit of continued azacitidine treatment beyond first response in responders. RESULTS: Overall, 91 of 179 patients achieved a response to azacitidine; responding patients received a median of 14 treatment cycles (range, 2-30). Median time to first response was 2 cycles (range, 1-16). Although 91% of first responses occurred by 6 cycles, continued azacitidine improved response category in 48% of patients. Best response was achieved by 92% of responders by 12 cycles. Median time from first response to best response was 3.5 cycles (95% confidence interval [CI], 3.0-6.0) in 30 patients who ultimately achieved a complete response, and 3.0 cycles (95% CI, 1.0-3.0) in 21 patients who achieved a partial response. CONCLUSIONS: Continued azacitidine therapy in responders was associated with a quantitative increase in response to a higher response category in 48% of patients, and therefore may enhance clinical benefit in patients with higher-risk MDS.
BACKGROUND: In the AZA-001 trial, azacitidine (75 mg/m(2) /d subcutaneously for Days 1-7 of every 28-day cycle) demonstrated improved survival compared with conventional care regimens in patients with International Prognostic Scoring System-defined intermediate-2- or high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome and World Health Organization-defined acute myeloid leukemia with 20% to 30% bone marrow blasts. METHODS: This secondary analysis of the AZA-001 phase 3 study evaluated the time to first response and the potential benefit of continued azacitidine treatment beyond first response in responders. RESULTS: Overall, 91 of 179 patients achieved a response to azacitidine; responding patients received a median of 14 treatment cycles (range, 2-30). Median time to first response was 2 cycles (range, 1-16). Although 91% of first responses occurred by 6 cycles, continued azacitidine improved response category in 48% of patients. Best response was achieved by 92% of responders by 12 cycles. Median time from first response to best response was 3.5 cycles (95% confidence interval [CI], 3.0-6.0) in 30 patients who ultimately achieved a complete response, and 3.0 cycles (95% CI, 1.0-3.0) in 21 patients who achieved a partial response. CONCLUSIONS: Continued azacitidine therapy in responders was associated with a quantitative increase in response to a higher response category in 48% of patients, and therefore may enhance clinical benefit in patients with higher-risk MDS.
Authors: B D Cheson; J M Bennett; H Kantarjian; A Pinto; C A Schiffer; S D Nimer; B Löwenberg; M Beran; T M de Witte; R M Stone; M Mittelman; G F Sanz; P W Wijermans; S Gore; P L Greenberg Journal: Blood Date: 2000-12-01 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Lewis R Silverman; David R McKenzie; Bercedis L Peterson; James F Holland; Jay T Backstrom; C L Beach; Richard A Larson Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2006-08-20 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Lewis R Silverman; Erin P Demakos; Bercedis L Peterson; Alice B Kornblith; Jimmie C Holland; Rosalie Odchimar-Reissig; Richard M Stone; Douglas Nelson; Bayard L Powell; Carlos M DeCastro; John Ellerton; Richard A Larson; Charles A Schiffer; James F Holland Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2002-05-15 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Alice B Kornblith; James E Herndon; Lewis R Silverman; Erin P Demakos; Rosalie Odchimar-Reissig; James F Holland; Bayard L Powell; Carlos DeCastro; John Ellerton; Richard A Larson; Charles A Schiffer; Jimmie C Holland Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2002-05-15 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Pierre Fenaux; Ghulam J Mufti; Eva Hellstrom-Lindberg; Valeria Santini; Carlo Finelli; Aristoteles Giagounidis; Robert Schoch; Norbert Gattermann; Guillermo Sanz; Alan List; Steven D Gore; John F Seymour; John M Bennett; John Byrd; Jay Backstrom; Linda Zimmerman; David McKenzie; Cl Beach; Lewis R Silverman Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2009-02-21 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: A G Dinmohamed; Y van Norden; O Visser; E F M Posthuma; P C Huijgens; P Sonneveld; A A van de Loosdrecht; M Jongen-Lavrencic Journal: Leukemia Date: 2015-09-15 Impact factor: 11.528
Authors: Amy J Davidoff; Xin Hu; Jan Philipp Bewersdorf; Rong Wang; Nikolai A Podoltsev; Scott F Huntington; Steven D Gore; Xiaomei Ma; Amer M Zeidan Journal: Leuk Lymphoma Date: 2019-12-26
Authors: Andrea Tendas; Maria Felicita Lissia; Daniela Piccioni; Liliana Tirimbelli; Laura Scaramucci; Marco Giovannini; Teresa Dentamaro; Alessio Perrotti; Paolo de Fabritiis; Pasquale Niscola Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2014-11-05 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Rami Komrokji; Arlene S Swern; David Grinblatt; Roger M Lyons; Magnus Tobiasson; Lewis R Silverman; Hamid Sayar; Ravi Vij; Albert Fliss; Nora Tu; Mary M Sugrue Journal: Oncologist Date: 2017-11-08