Literature DB >> 21656647

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation: lessons from the learning curve of the first 270 high-risk patients.

Ronen Gurvitch1, Edgar L Tay, Namal Wijesinghe, J Ye, Fabian Nietlispach, David A Wood, Samuel Lichtenstein, Anson Cheung, John G Webb.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is a rapidly evolving strategy for therapy of aortic stenosis. We describe the effect of the learning curve from the first 270 high-risk patients in Vancouver, Canada.
METHODS: Patients underwent TAVI by transfemoral (63%) or transapical (37%) routes using balloon expandable valves. The experience was divided into the first half (FH, patients 1-135) and second half (SH, patients 136-270).
RESULTS: The mean age was 83.2 ± 8 years (FH 83 ± 12 vs. SH 81 ± 7 years, P = 0.12). The mean Society of Thoracic Surgeons Score (STS) was 9.5% ± 5.2%- FH 10.5 vs. SH 8.5% (P = 0.01). The overall procedural success rate in the FH was 92.6%, improving to 97.8% in the SH (P = 0.05). The transfemoral procedural success improved-FH 89.3% to SH 98.8% (P = 0.01). The transapical procedural success remained high-FH 98.0% to SH 96.1% (P = 0.53). The overall 30-day mortality was 9.6%, improving from FH 13.3% to SH 5.9% (P = 0.04). In the transfemoral cases, 30-day mortality decreased by 56% [10.7-4.7%, P = 0.14], and similarly in transapical cases [17.6-7.8%, P = 0.14]. In-hospital stroke occurred in 3.3% (FH 3.7% vs. SH 2.9%, P = 0.74). The overall need for a new permanent pacemaker was 5.9% (FH 5.9% vs. SH 5.9%, P = 1). The overall major vascular injury rate was 6.7% (FH 8.1% vs. SH 5.2%, P = 0.33). The overall incidence of coronary vessel occlusion was 1.1% (FH 1.5 % vs. SH 0.7%, P = 0.56). Device embolization or failure to cross the valve was rare and largely seen in the FH only. Procedural experience (>135 procedures) was an independent predictor of 30-day survival (HR: 6.7, 95% CI: 1.2-18.1, P = 0.03).
CONCLUSION: TAVI outcomes improve with experience and device development. While overall complication rates are low, scope remains to further reduce procedural adverse events.
Copyright © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21656647     DOI: 10.1002/ccd.22961

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv        ISSN: 1522-1946            Impact factor:   2.692


  34 in total

1.  Modeling risk of coronary obstruction during transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

Authors:  Megan Heitkemper; Hoda Hatoum; Amirsepehr Azimian; Breandan Yeats; Jennifer Dollery; Bryan Whitson; Greg Rushing; Juan Crestanello; Scott M Lilly; Lakshmi Prasad Dasi
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2019-05-18       Impact factor: 5.209

2.  Is proctoring mandatory when starting a TAVI program?

Authors:  Mattia Glauber; Michele Murzi; Alfredo G Cerillo
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2012-07

3.  A systematic review of transapical aortic valve implantation.

Authors:  Mohammad Rahnavardi; Jaime Santibanez; Karan Sian; Tristan D Yan
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2012-07

4.  Transapical transcatheter aortic valve implantation: the front door approach captures the world.

Authors:  Barbara E Stähli; Lukas Altwegg
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2012-12

5.  A prospective, non-randomized comparison of SAPIEN XT and CoreValve implantation in two sequential cohorts of patients with severe aortic stenosis.

Authors:  Albert Markus Kasel; Salvatore Cassese; Thomas Ischinger; Alexander Leber; Diethmar Antoni; Gotthard Riess; Jayshree Vogel; Adnan Kastrati; Walter Eichinger; Ellen Hoffmann
Journal:  Am J Cardiovasc Dis       Date:  2014-06-28

6.  Mid-term study of transcatheter aortic valve implantation in an Asian population with severe aortic stenosis: two-year Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 outcomes.

Authors:  Nicholas Chew; Jimmy Kim Fatt Hon; Wei Luen James Yip; Siew Pang Chan; Kian-Keong Poh; William Kok-Fai Kong; Kristine Leok Kheng Teoh; Tiong Cheng Yeo; Huay Cheem Tan; Edgar Lik Wui Tay
Journal:  Singapore Med J       Date:  2016-08-12       Impact factor: 1.858

7.  A proctoring system to manage the learning curve associated with the introduction of transcatheter aortic valve implantation in Japan.

Authors:  Masahiro Yamawaki; Kiyotaka Iwasaki; Motoharu Araki; Tsutomu Ito; Yoshiaki Ito; Norio Tada; Kensuke Takagi; Futoshi Yamanaka; Yusuke Watanabe; Masanori Yamamoto; Shinichi Shirai; Kentaro Hayashida
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2017-12-11       Impact factor: 2.037

Review 8.  Transcatheter aortic valve implantation: current and future approaches.

Authors:  Josep Rodés-Cabau
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2011-11-15       Impact factor: 32.419

9.  Learning Alternative Access Approaches for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: Implications for New Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Centers.

Authors:  Matthew C Henn; Thomas Percival; Alan Zajarias; Spencer J Melby; Brian R Lindman; Nishath Quader; Ralph J Damiano; Marc R Moon; John M Lasala; Ravinder S Rao; Jennifer Bell; Marci S Damiano; Hersh S Maniar
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2016-10-17       Impact factor: 4.330

Review 10.  Aortic regurgitation after transcatheter aortic valve implantation: mechanisms and implications.

Authors:  Barbara E Stähli; Willibald Maier; Roberto Corti; Thomas F Lüscher; Rolf Jenni; Felix C Tanner
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2013-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.