Literature DB >> 21656396

A brief instrument to measure patients' overall satisfaction with primary care physicians.

Mohammadreza Hojat1, Daniel Z Louis, Kaye Maxwell, Fred W Markham, Richard C Wender, Joseph S Gonnella.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: A brief and psychometrically sound scale to measure patients' overall satisfaction with their primary care physicians would be useful in studies where a longer instrument is impractical. The purpose of this study was to develop and examine the psychometrics of a brief instrument to measure patients' overall satisfaction with their primary care physicians.
METHODS: Research participants included 535 outpatients (between 18--75 years old, 66% female) who completed a mailed survey that included 10 items for measuring overall satisfaction with their primary care physician who was named on the survey. Patients were also asked about their perceptions of physician empathy, preventive tests recommended by the physician (colonoscopy, mammogram, and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) for age and gender appropriate patients) and demographic information.
RESULTS: Factor analysis of the patient satisfaction items resulted in one prominent component. Corrected item-total score correlations of the patient satisfaction scale ranged from 0.85 to 0.96; correlation between patient satisfaction scores and patient perception of physician empathy was 0.93, and correlation with recommending the physician to family and friends was 0.92. Criterion-related validity coefficients were mostly in the 0.80s and 0.90s. Patient satisfaction scores were significantly higher for those whose physicians recommended preventive tests (colonoscopy, mammogram, and PSA-compliance rates >.80). Cronbach's coefficient alpha for patient satisfaction scale was 0.98.
CONCLUSIONS: Empirical evidence supported the validity and reliability of a brief patient satisfaction scale that has utility in the assessments of educational programs aimed at improving patient satisfaction, medical services, and patient outcomes in primary care settings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21656396

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fam Med        ISSN: 0742-3225            Impact factor:   1.756


  34 in total

1.  Predictors of isoniazid preventive therapy completion among HIV-infected patients receiving differentiated and non-differentiated HIV care in rural Uganda.

Authors:  Khai Hoan Tram; Florence Mwangwa; Gabriel Chamie; Mucunguzi Atukunda; Asiphas Owaraganise; James Ayieko; Vivek Jain; Tamara D Clark; Dalsone Kwarisiima; Maya L Petersen; Moses R Kamya; Edwin D Charlebois; Diane V Havlir; Carina Marquez
Journal:  AIDS Care       Date:  2019-06-10

2.  Association of Nurses' Self-Reported Empathy and Mu Suppression with Patients' Satisfaction.

Authors:  Nasser Goodarzi; Kamran Azma; Ehsan Tavakolian; Pedram Peyvand
Journal:  J Caring Sci       Date:  2015-09-01

Review 3.  Effectiveness of empathy in general practice: a systematic review.

Authors:  Frans Derksen; Jozien Bensing; Antoine Lagro-Janssen
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 5.386

4.  Impact of Scribes on Physician Satisfaction, Patient Satisfaction, and Charting Efficiency: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Risha Gidwani; Cathina Nguyen; Alexis Kofoed; Catherine Carragee; Tracy Rydel; Ian Nelligan; Amelia Sattler; Megan Mahoney; Steven Lin
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 5.166

5.  Differences between GP perception of delivered empathy and patient-perceived empathy: a cross-sectional study in primary care.

Authors:  Lianne Hermans; Tim Olde Hartman; Patrick W Dielissen
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2018-07-16       Impact factor: 5.386

6.  Can I Get a Suggestion? Medical Improv as a Tool for Empathy Training in Obstetrics and Gynecology Residents.

Authors:  Fei Cai; Merima Ruhotina; Melissa Bowler; Elisabeth Howard; Phinnara Has; Gary N Frishman; Kyle Wohlrab
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2019-10

Review 7.  Interventions to cultivate physician empathy: a systematic review.

Authors:  Zak Kelm; James Womer; Jennifer K Walter; Chris Feudtner
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2014-10-14       Impact factor: 2.463

8.  A Shared Decision-Making Tool to Prevent Substance Abuse: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Ju Long; Juntao Michael Yuan; Ron Kim Johnson
Journal:  JMIR Res Protoc       Date:  2018-01-11

9.  Levels of empathy in undergraduate emergency health, nursing, and midwifery students: a longitudinal study.

Authors:  Brett Williams; Ted Brown; Malcolm Boyle; Lisa McKenna; Claire Palermo; Jamie Etherington
Journal:  Adv Med Educ Pract       Date:  2014-09-11

10.  THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN MU SUPPRESSION AND NURSES' EMPATHY WITH THE DIFFERENCE OF THREE YEARS OF WORK EXPERIENCE.

Authors:  Kamran Azma; Nasser Goodarzi; Ehsan Tavakolian; Farhad Yadegarian
Journal:  Mater Sociomed       Date:  2015-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.