Literature DB >> 21655936

The single active X in human cells: evolutionary tinkering personified.

Barbara R Migeon1.   

Abstract

All mammals compensate for sex differences in numbers of X chromosomes by transcribing only a single X chromosome in cells of both sexes; however, they differ from one another in the details of the compensatory mechanisms. These species variations result from chance mutations, species differences in the staging of developmental events, and interactions between events that occur concurrently. Such variations, which have only recently been appreciated, do not interfere with the strategy of establishing a single active X, but they influence how it is carried out. In an overview of X dosage compensation in human cells, I point out the evolutionary variations. I also argue that it is the single active X that is chosen, rather than inactive ones. Further, I suggest that the initial events in the process-those that precede silencing of future inactive X chromosomes-include randomly choosing the future active X, most likely by repressing its XIST locus.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21655936     DOI: 10.1007/s00439-011-1016-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Genet        ISSN: 0340-6717            Impact factor:   4.132


  90 in total

Review 1.  Complexity and tinkering.

Authors:  F Jacob
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 5.691

2.  Is Tsix repression of Xist specific to mouse?

Authors:  Barbara R Migeon
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 38.330

3.  Epigenetic dynamics of imprinted X inactivation during early mouse development.

Authors:  Ikuhiro Okamoto; Arie P Otte; C David Allis; Danny Reinberg; Edith Heard
Journal:  Science       Date:  2003-12-11       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Tsix-mediated repression of Xist accumulation is not sufficient for normal random X inactivation.

Authors:  C Morey; D Arnaud; P Avner; P Clerc
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2001-06-15       Impact factor: 6.150

5.  Stability of X chromosomal inactivation in human somatic cells.

Authors:  B R Migeon
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1972-09-08       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Identification of regulatory elements flanking human XIST reveals species differences.

Authors:  Samuel C Chang; Carolyn J Brown
Journal:  BMC Mol Biol       Date:  2010-03-08       Impact factor: 2.946

7.  DNA methylation stabilizes X chromosome inactivation in eutherians but not in marsupials: evidence for multistep maintenance of mammalian X dosage compensation.

Authors:  D C Kaslow; B R Migeon
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1987-09       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  The long noncoding RNA, Jpx, is a molecular switch for X chromosome inactivation.

Authors:  Di Tian; Sha Sun; Jeannie T Lee
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2010-10-29       Impact factor: 41.582

9.  RNF12 activates Xist and is essential for X chromosome inactivation.

Authors:  Tahsin Stefan Barakat; Nilhan Gunhanlar; Cristina Gontan Pardo; Eskeatnaf Mulugeta Achame; Mehrnaz Ghazvini; Ruben Boers; Annegien Kenter; Eveline Rentmeester; J Anton Grootegoed; Joost Gribnau
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2011-01-27       Impact factor: 5.917

10.  2-D structure of the A region of Xist RNA and its implication for PRC2 association.

Authors:  Sylvain Maenner; Magali Blaud; Laetitia Fouillen; Anne Savoye; Virginie Marchand; Agnès Dubois; Sarah Sanglier-Cianférani; Alain Van Dorsselaer; Philippe Clerc; Philip Avner; Athanase Visvikis; Christiane Branlant
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2010-01-05       Impact factor: 8.029

View more
  7 in total

1.  Silencing XIST on the future active X: Searching human and bovine preimplantation embryos for the repressor.

Authors:  Melis A Aksit; Bo Yu; Bernard A J Roelen; Barbara R Migeon
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2022-05-19       Impact factor: 4.246

2.  X-linked genes and risk of orofacial clefts: evidence from two population-based studies in Scandinavia.

Authors:  Astanand Jugessur; Øivind Skare; Rolv T Lie; Allen J Wilcox; Kaare Christensen; Lene Christiansen; Truc Trung Nguyen; Jeffrey C Murray; Håkon K Gjessing
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-06-19       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Targeting of >1.5 Mb of human DNA into the mouse X chromosome reveals presence of cis-acting regulators of epigenetic silencing.

Authors:  Christine Yang; Andrea J McLeod; Allison M Cotton; Charles N de Leeuw; Stéphanie Laprise; Kathleen G Banks; Elizabeth M Simpson; Carolyn J Brown
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2012-09-28       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Demarcation of stable subpopulations within the pluripotent hESC compartment.

Authors:  Sonam Bhatia; Carlos Pilquil; Ivana Roth-Albin; Jonathan S Draper
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-02-21       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Titles and abstracts of scientific reports ignore variation among species.

Authors:  Barbara R Migeon
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2014-12-24       Impact factor: 8.140

Review 6.  A primer on the use of mouse models for identifying direct sex chromosome effects that cause sex differences in non-gonadal tissues.

Authors:  Paul S Burgoyne; Arthur P Arnold
Journal:  Biol Sex Differ       Date:  2016-12-13       Impact factor: 5.027

7.  Embryonic loss of human females with partial trisomy 19 identifies region critical for the single active X.

Authors:  Barbara R Migeon; Michael A Beer; Hans T Bjornsson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-04-12       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.