OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA), Sealapex, and a combination of Sealapex and MTA (Sealapex Plus) on the reaction of subcutaneous connective tissue of rats, and on cell viability and cytokine production in mouse fibroblasts. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The tissue reaction was carried out with dentin tubes containing the materials implanted in the dorsal connective tissue of rats. The histological analysis was performed after 7 and 30 days. Millipore culture plate inserts with polyethylene tubes filled with materials were placed into 24-well cell culture plates with mouse fibroblasts to evaluate the cell viability by MTT assay. ELISA assays were also performed after 24 h of exposure of the mouse fibroblasts to set material disks. RESULTS: Histopathologic examination showed Von Kossa-positive granules that were birefringent to polarized light for all the studied materials at the tube openings. No material inhibited the cell viability in the in vitro test. It was detected IL-6 production in all root-end filling materials. MTA and Sealapex Plus induced a slight raise of mean levels of IL-1β. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that Sealapex Plus is biocompatible and stimulates the mineralization of the tissue.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA), Sealapex, and a combination of Sealapex and MTA (Sealapex Plus) on the reaction of subcutaneous connective tissue of rats, and on cell viability and cytokine production in mouse fibroblasts. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The tissue reaction was carried out with dentin tubes containing the materials implanted in the dorsal connective tissue of rats. The histological analysis was performed after 7 and 30 days. Millipore culture plate inserts with polyethylene tubes filled with materials were placed into 24-well cell culture plates with mouse fibroblasts to evaluate the cell viability by MTT assay. ELISA assays were also performed after 24 h of exposure of the mouse fibroblasts to set material disks. RESULTS: Histopathologic examination showed Von Kossa-positive granules that were birefringent to polarized light for all the studied materials at the tube openings. No material inhibited the cell viability in the in vitro test. It was detected IL-6 production in all root-end filling materials. MTA and Sealapex Plus induced a slight raise of mean levels of IL-1β. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that Sealapex Plus is biocompatible and stimulates the mineralization of the tissue.
The ideal material to repair perforations should be biocompatible, seal the root
canal system, induce osteogenesis and cementogenesis, and be dimensionally stable,
i.e. unaffected by the presence of moisture. In addition, it should be easy to
manipulate. Many materials including Cavit IRM, amalgam, Super EBA, composite
resins, and glass ionomers have been tested, but none meet all
requirements[24].Mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) was introduced to be used in pathologic or
iatrogenic root perforations, as well as in root-end cavities[12,27]. Studies have shown that MTA promotes favorable tissue
reactions, characterized by absence of severe inflammatory responses, presence of a
fibrous capsule, and the induction of formation of mineralized repair tissue and
promoted efficient sealing of root perforations[2,12]. The hydrophilic
nature of the particles from MTA powder allows its use even in the presence of
moisture[27].Studies evaluating MTA as a root-end filling material have shown less periapical
inflammation, the presence of a fibrous capsule, and the formation of new cementum
in contact with the material surface in many cases[2]. Similar findings were reported by Holland, et
al.[7] (2001) in a study
with dogs. A dentin bridge covering the pulp tissue was also found after pulp
capping with MTA[18].In spite of favorable characteristics, MTA sealer presents working properties that
are less than ideal. The resulting cement from the mixing of powder to water is
difficult to manipulate[25]; its
setting time has been reported to be of almost 3 h, while the working time is less
than 4 min[14]. Additional moisture
is also required to activate its setting[16].Sealapex (Sybron Endo, Glendora, CA, USA) is clinically used due to its favorable
healing process, which may be related to the diffusion of ions[23]. This diffusion from the sealer
raises the pH at the surface of the root adjacent to periodontal tissues, and favors
the healing[28]. The high pH favors
antimicrobial action[4], the
degradation of bacterial lipopolysaccharides[19], as well as the induction of hard tissue
formation[5], and the
control of inflammatory root resorption[30].An experimental combination between Sealapex and MTA (Sealapex Plus) was proposed in
order to offer similar biological properties to MTA, but with better working
properties, such as handling and working time[1]. Although this experimental combination apparently presents
positive characteristics, there is no work evaluating its biocompatibility. There
are several methods to evaluate the biocompatibility, but those assessing
cytotoxicity and subcutaneous connective tissue response are the most common,
standardized and reproducible ones.The aim of this study was to evaluate the reaction of rat subcutaneous connective
tissue to the implantation of dentin tubes filled with a combination of
Sealapex® with Angelus® MTA (Angelus,
Londrina, Paraná, Brazil) (Sealapex Plus) in comparison to
Angelus® MTA and Sealapex®. Moreover, the
study aimed at determining the effects of the root-end filling materials on cell
viability and the expression of inflammatory cytokines using a mouse fibroblasts
cell line.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
Histopathologic study (in vivo test)
Animals
In this study, 24 4-6-month-old male Wistar Albino rats, weighing between
250-280 g, were used. The animals were housed in temperature-controlled
rooms, and received water and food ad libitum. The care of
the animals was carried out according to Research Ethics Committee of
Araçatuba School of Dentistry, which approved the project prior to
the beginning of the experiments.
Dentin tubes
Forty-eight dentin tubes were prepared from human tooth roots. The canals
were enlarged up to reamer #35 and then over-instrumented 2 mm beyond the
apical foramen. The length of the tubes was 7 mm, and the thickness of their
outer walls about 0.5 mm. The dentin tubes were thoroughly irrigated with
17% EDTA and sodium hypochlorite, and then washed with distilled water
before being autoclaved[8].
The tubes were filled with Angelus® MTA,
Sealapex® and a material resulted from the combination
of Sealapex® and Angelus® MTA. Of the
total, 8 dentin tubes remained empty and were used as controls. The
Angelus® MTA and Sealapex® were
prepared according to the recommendations of the manufacturers. The
combination of Sealapex® and Angelus®
MTA was achieved by mixing a portion of MTA to Sealapex until obtaining a
putty-like consistence (0.15 g Sealapex/0.5 g MTA), which allowed the
improvement of its insertion into the root end cavities.
Protocol in histopathologic study
The animals were shaved under xylazine (10 mg/kg) and ketamine (25 mg/kg)
anesthesia and disinfected with 5% iodine solution. The shaved backs received a
2 cm wide incision in a head-to-tail orientation with the use of a number 15 BP
blade. The skin was reflected in order to create two pockets on each side of the
incision. The implantation materials were inserted into the spaces created with
blunt dissection immediately after the preparation and the skin was closed with
3/0 silk suture.The evaluations were done at 7 and 30 days after surgical implantation. At the
time, the tubes and surrounding tissues were removed and fixed in 10% buffered
formalin. The blocks containing dentin tube were embedded in a mixture of
paraffin (95%) and carnauba wax (5%)[5]. The sectioning was serially performed at 10 μm
intervals with the use of a hard-tissue microtome. The sections were obtained
one by one, always after the application of paraffin wax on the sample surface.
This layer of paraffin wax holds the sections flat and enables easier fitting
onto the heated glass slide with albumen. Then, the sections were either stained
according to the Von Kossa technique, or remained without staining in order to
be observed under polarized light.Reactions in the tissue in contact with the material on the open tube end were
scored as 0, none or few inflammatory cells and no reaction; 1, less than 25
cells and mild reaction; 2, between 25-125 cells and moderate reaction; and 3,
125 and more cells and severe reaction. Fibrous capsules were considered to be
thin when thickness was <150 μm and thick at >150 μm. Necrosis and
calcification were recorded as present or absent. An average of the number of
cells for each group was obtained from 10 separate areas. The observer was
blinded to treatment allocation. Results were analyzed statistically by ANOVA
and Kruskal Wallis tests at 5% significance level.
In vitro tests
Cell culture
L929mouse fibroblasts were grown in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium
(DMEM) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (GIBCO BRL, Gaithersburg,
MD, USA) streptomycin (50 g/mL), and 1% antibiotic/antimycotic cocktail (300
units/mL penicillin, 300 μg/mL streptomycin, 5 μg/mL amphotericin B) (GIBCO
BRL, Gaithersburg, MD, USA) under standard cell culture conditions
(37ºC, 100% humidity, 95% air, and 5% CO2).
Cytotoxicity Testing
L929 fibroblasts were seeded into the 24-well plates (3x104
cells/1 mL medium per well). The cells were incubated for
24 h in a humidified air atmosphere of 5% CO2 at 37ºC. The
test materials were placed in clear, unfilled polyethylene tubes (1.1 mm
inner diameter x 10 mm length (BARD, C.R., Bard Ireland LTDA, Galway,
Ireland), and inserted in the fibroblast culture. Six wells were used for
each material and an empty tube was used as control. The exposures of cell
cultures were stopped by the discarding of the exposure media after 24 h.
Viable cells were stained with formazan dye
(3-[4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl]-2,5-diphenyl tetrazolium
bromide) (MTT) (Sigma Chemical Co, St Louis, MO, USA). MTT was dissolved in
PBS at 5 mg/mL and filtered in order to sterilize and remove a small amount
of insoluble residue. At the times indicated below, stock MTT solution (20
μL per 180 μL medium) was added to all wells of an assay,
and plates were incubated at 37ºC for 4 h. The medium was then
removed by inverting the plate and dumping 200 μL of isopropylic alcohol,
which was added to the wells and mixed during 30 min to dissolve the dark
blue crystals. The blue solution was transferred to a 96-well plate and the
absorbance was read in the micro plate reader at 570 nm wavelength. Data
were analyzed statistically by ANOVA and Bonferroni correction.
Statistically significant differences were considered if p<0.05.
Cytokine assay
For cytokine assay, the tested materials were inserted into the wells of
24-well flat bottom plates (Corning Incorporated, Corning, NY, USA), and
condensed to disks that were approximately 1 mm thick and with the same
diameter of the wells. The materials were allowed to set for 2 weeks in cell
culture medium at 37ºC and 100%. The medium was changed every day
during this time. L929 fibroblasts were seeded into the wells
(106 cells/1 mL medium per well) with the
material disks in the bottom. The plates were incubated for 24 h. After
incubation, culture media were collected and analyzed for IL-1ß and
IL-6 content by ELISA (R&D Systems, Inc., Minneapolis, MN, USA). Cells
cultured without tested material served as negative controls. Data were
analyzed statistically by ANOVA and Bonferroni correction. Statistical
differences were considered significant if p<0.05.
RESULTS
Histopathologic study
In the control group, the implanted tubes were surrounded by a layer of exudate
with neutrophils at the 7th day. Over this area, there were young
fibroblasts and chronic inflammatory cells in a moderate amount.Thirty days after implantation, in the control group, the samples showed ingrown
connective tissue with mild chronic inflammatory cells filling the tube space.
Outside, the tubes were surrounded by a thin fibrous capsule exhibiting a mild
chronic inflammatory reaction (Figure
1).
Figure 1
(Control group) (a) 7 days. Von Kossa positive granulations were not
observed near the tube opening (7 days, VK, 100x). (b) Von Kossa
positive granulations were not observed near the tube opening (30 days,
VK, 100x)
(Control group) (a) 7 days. Von Kossa positive granulations were not
observed near the tube opening (7 days, VK, 100x). (b) Von Kossa
positive granulations were not observed near the tube opening (30 days,
VK, 100x)In the experimental groups, the results observed with the implantation of the
tubes filled by MTA, Sealapex or the combination of Sealapex and MTA (Sealapex
Plus) were similar at 7 and 30 days. At the 7th day, all materials
exhibited a moderate chronic inflammatory reaction that became mild at the
30th day, similar to that observed in the control group. The
non-demineralized sections exhibited birefringent granulations to polarized
light (Figures 2C, 2D, 3C and 3D) as well as extensive and irregular areas
which were highly positive to Von Kossa staining, next to the birefringent
granules (Figures 2A, 2B, 3A and 3B).
Figure 2
(MTA) (a) Observe Von Kossa-positive irregular tissue (arrows) located
near the material (7 days, VK, 50x). (b). Observe Von Kossa-positive
irregular tissue (arrows) located near the tube opening (30 days, VK,
50x). (c) Note numerous granulations (arrows), birefringent to polarized
light (7 days, polarized light, 50x). (d). Note numerous granulations
(arrows), birefringent to polarized light (30 days, polarized light,
50x)
Figure 3
(Sealapex Plus) (a) Observe Von Kossa-positive irregular tissue (arrows)
located near the material (7 days, VK, 100x). (b) Observe Von
Kossa-positive irregular tissue (arrows) located near the tube opening
(30 days, VK, 100x). (c) Note numerous granulations (arrows),
birefringent to polarized light (7 days, polarized light, 100x). (d)
Note numerous granulations (arrows), birefringent to polarized light (30
days, polarized light, 100x)
(MTA) (a) Observe Von Kossa-positive irregular tissue (arrows) located
near the material (7 days, VK, 50x). (b). Observe Von Kossa-positive
irregular tissue (arrows) located near the tube opening (30 days, VK,
50x). (c) Note numerous granulations (arrows), birefringent to polarized
light (7 days, polarized light, 50x). (d). Note numerous granulations
(arrows), birefringent to polarized light (30 days, polarized light,
50x)(Sealapex Plus) (a) Observe Von Kossa-positive irregular tissue (arrows)
located near the material (7 days, VK, 100x). (b) Observe Von
Kossa-positive irregular tissue (arrows) located near the tube opening
(30 days, VK, 100x). (c) Note numerous granulations (arrows),
birefringent to polarized light (7 days, polarized light, 100x). (d)
Note numerous granulations (arrows), birefringent to polarized light (30
days, polarized light, 100x)
Comparison among the groups
The data were compared in each period of time and are presented in the Table
1.Percentage of samples in each group categorized according to the
inflammatory score, presence of necrosis and thickness of fibrous
capsuleAt day 7, there was no statistically significant difference among the scores of
the different groups (mean score of 2). At day 30, there was no statistically
significant difference among the scores of the different groups (mean score of
1).For the MTT assay (24 h), no statistically difference was found (p<0.05)
between the experimental material s and the control group. Sealapex, Sealapex
Plus and MTA did not inhibit the cell viability. These results were expressed as
means of the absorbance (A570nm) of each material and control group
(Figure 4).
Figure 4
Viability of fibroblasts in the presence of different materials at 24 h.
It was not found statistically significant difference (p<0.05)
between the experimental materials and the control group. These results
were expressed as means of the absorbance (A570 nm) ± standard deviation
of each material and the control group
Viability of fibroblasts in the presence of different materials at 24 h.
It was not found statistically significant difference (p<0.05)
between the experimental materials and the control group. These results
were expressed as means of the absorbance (A570 nm) ± standard deviation
of each material and the control groupThe mean concentrations of IL-6 for the different groups are shown in Figure 5. The ELISA revealed that the mean
levels of IL-6 were raised when the cells were grown in the presence of MTA,
Sealapex and Sealapex Plus at 24 h. There was not statistically significant
difference (p<0.05) between the experimental materials and the control
group.
Figure 5
Mean expression of IL-6 from fibroblasts cells in the presence of
different materials at 24 h. Mean levels of IL-6 were raised when the
cells were grown in the presence of the materials. There was not
statistically significant difference (p<0.05) between the
experimental materials and the control group
Mean expression of IL-6 from fibroblasts cells in the presence of
different materials at 24 h. Mean levels of IL-6 were raised when the
cells were grown in the presence of the materials. There was not
statistically significant difference (p<0.05) between the
experimental materials and the control groupThe mean concentrations of IL-1ß for the different groups are shown in
Figure 6. The ELISA assays revealed
that the mean levels of IL-1ß were slightly raised when the cells were
grown in the presence of MTA and Sealapex Plus at 24 h. Moreover, the cells did
not induce IL-1ß production in the presence of Sealapex. In spite of the
slight raise of IL-1ß concentration in MTA and Sealapex Plus groups,
there was no statistically significant difference (p<0.05) between the
experimental materials and the control group.
Figure 6
Mean expression of IL-1β from fibroblasts cells in the presence
of different materials at 24 h. Mean levels of IL-1β were
slightly raised when the cells were grown in the presence of MTA and
Sealapex Plus at 24 h. Moreover, the cells did not induce IL-1β
production in the presence of Sealapex. There was not statistically
significant difference (p<0.05) between the experimental materials
and the control group
Mean expression of IL-1β from fibroblasts cells in the presence
of different materials at 24 h. Mean levels of IL-1β were
slightly raised when the cells were grown in the presence of MTA and
Sealapex Plus at 24 h. Moreover, the cells did not induce IL-1β
production in the presence of Sealapex. There was not statistically
significant difference (p<0.05) between the experimental materials
and the control group
DISCUSSION
The dentin tubes for subcutaneous implantation were used according to Holland, et
al.[9] (1999). Empty tubes
from control groups promoted few or no reactions in subcutaneous tissue and produced
normal repair tissues, similar to results reported in the literature[8,9].The present results with MTA were similar to those previously described when dentin
tubes filled with this material were implanted in subcutaneous tissue of
rats[8,9]. It is known that MTA has no calcium hydroxide in
its formulation[4]. However, mixing
the powder with water results in a structure that contains basically calcium oxide
and calcium phosphate[25]. The
calcium oxide reacted with tissue fluids to form calcium hydroxide. The birefringent
granulations observed next to MTA and into the dentin walls tubules are probably
calcite crystals originated from the reaction of the calcium from the material with
carbon dioxide from the connective tissue[9]. The deposition of calcite crystals seems to be very
important to the mechanism of action of calcium hydroxide formed from the mixture of
MTA with water. Seux, et al.[20]
(1991) reported a rich extra cellular network of fibronectin in close contact with
these crystals on incubation in a culture medium without cells. They reported that
fibronectin first came from the culture medium and later from the cells. The authors
concluded that their findings strongly supported the role of calcite crystals and
fibronectin as an initiating step in the formation of a hard tissue barrier. In our
study, we observed a von Kossa-positive tissue barrier next to these crystals, like
the hard tissue deposition in direct contact with MTA, as described in other
papers[9]. This hard tissue
is very irregular in subcutaneous tissue[25], but similar to dentin in pulp tissue[2,25] and periapical tissues[2,27].In this experiment, the same structures found with MTA were observed with the
Sealapex Plus. The birefringent granulations and the Von Kossa-positive tissue
structures were present in the same amount. Sealapex is a calcium hydroxide based
sealer, and it was possible to observe similar biological characteristics and action
mechanism with calcium hydroxide and MTA[7]. The high solubility of Sealapex enhances the
physicochemical and biological features and the releasing of more calcium and
hydroxyl ions may lead it to induce the root apex mineralization[6]. However, it would be possible that
the combination of Sealapex with MTA would alter the solubility and the release of
calcium ions from the material, but the results reported in this paper show that
this hypothesis was null once birefringent structures to polarized light and Von
Kossa-positive structures continued to be observed encouraging more studies and its
future use.In vitro tests such as cell culture enable experimental factors and
variables to be controlled, which is often a significant problem when performing
in vivo experiments[21]. The mouse fibroblasts cell line (L929), which has also
been used in previous cell viability studies[17,26], was chosen in
this experimental model.In this study, cell viability was determined by MTT assay based on the ability of
mitochondrial dehydrogenase enzymes in living cells to convert the yellow
water-soluble tetrazolium salt MTT into dark blue formazan crystals. The advantages
of this method are its simplicity, rapidity and precision. In addition, it does not
require radioisotopes[11].
Statistical analyses of the data of the MTT assay showed no significant differences
among the three cements in 24 h. However, longer periods of observation could be
performed to evaluate the effects of the sealers on the cells along the time once
the cytotoxicity can be altered with the time.Although the experimental conditions in this study differed from those used in others
studies, our results agree with previous studies that showed that MTA was not
cytotoxic[17,25]. Torabinejad, et al.[25] (1995), using agar overlay assay
in L-929 mouse, tested samples of MTA, amalgam, Super-EBA and Intermediate
Restorative Material (IRM), and found that freshly mixed and set amalgam were
significantly less toxic than MTA, Super EBA, and IRM. However, when radiochromium
methods were used, the degree of cytotoxicity of fresh and set materials showed that
MTA was less toxic than the rest of the materials tested.Sealapex was not cytotoxic when compared to the control group. Previous study found
that calcium hydroxide-based sealers were cultured with human fibroblasts for three
weeks, showing a cytotoxic reaction at the beginning and an almost complete
recovering of the Sealapex by fibroblasts between the 5th and
9th day of culturing, and remained this way during the rest of the
testing period[3]. The results of
that study disagree with other previous studies that proved Sealapex to be
cytotoxic[10,11,13].The use of sealers based on calcium hydroxide has been proposed for the permanent
obturation of the root canal system. Sealapex is primarily made of calcium
hydroxide, and it demonstrates only slight toxicity in the fresh state. However, it
exhibited increasing toxicity when set to confirm the results of previous studies
that reported considerable leakage of cytotoxic substances from the disintegrating
sealer[13]. This apparent
instability in an aqueous environment might enhance the release of substances from
set Sealapex[11].The combination between Sealapex and MTA (Sealapex Plus) was not cytotoxic in the
present investigation. It is possible to assume that the combination of Sealapex and
MTA, which have adequate behavior in cell culture[17,25]
maintained the qualities of the isolated materials on cell viability. Although this
experimental combination apparently presents positive characteristics, other studies
and methodologies are necessary to confirm the benefit of this material.The synthesis of cytokines is very complex, and their expression and effects are
governed by many factors that include other cells and mediators[22]. Previous studies have shown that
MTA-stimulated osteoblasts produce IL-1ß[22]. In this study, there was a slight production of
IL-1ß by fibroblasts stimulated by MTA and Sealapex Plus; however, it was not
statically significant when compared with the control. Moreover, we also did not
find IL-1ß release related to Sealapex. It is possible that IL-1ß
expression requires a greater stimulus than other cytokines, and because of the
reduced amount of substrate in this study, the product was not enough. Due to the
inflammatory response of IL-1, which acts as an uncoupling agent between bone
resorption and formation[10], IL-1
production would be depressed with very biocompatible materials[15].In this study, there was also an investigation on the effect of root-end filling
materials on IL-6 release. Other cell types like osteoblast cells, when in the
presence of MTA, expressed high concentrations of IL-6[15]. The expression of IL-6 in the presence of all
materials suggests that not only they are biocompatible, but they also may promote
healing with stimulation of bone turnover, due to the stimulation of osteoclast
formation and recruitment by IL-6[30].
CONSLUSION
The obtained results and the mechanism of action of Sealapex Plus were similar to
those reported for MTA. Sealapex Plus was not cytotoxic at 24 h. In the presence of
Sealapex Plus L929 expressed high concentrations of IL-6 and slight concentrations
of IL-1ß. The results also suggest that Sealapex Plus is biocompatible and
stimulates the mineralization of the tissue, but further studies are necessary to
corroborate the present findings.
Table 1
Percentage of samples in each group categorized according to the
inflammatory score, presence of necrosis and thickness of fibrous
capsule
Authors: L A B Silva; L U Azevedo; A Consolaro; F Barnett; Y Xu; R A Battaglino; P S Cañadas; Katharina Morant Holanda de Oliveira; R A B Silva Journal: Clin Oral Investig Date: 2017-03-09 Impact factor: 3.573
Authors: Emily V F da Silva; Marcelo C Goiato; Sandro B Bitencourt; Victor G B Brito; Aline S Takamyia; Paulo A Penitente; Sandra H P de Oliveira; Daniela M Dos Santos Journal: Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J Date: 2022-05-26