Literature DB >> 21655423

The development of a clinical decision making algorithm for detection of osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture or wedge deformity.

Matthew Roman1, Christopher Brown, William Richardson, Robert Isaacs, Cameron Howes, Chad Cook.   

Abstract

The clinical diagnosis of an osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture (OVCF) is challenging and requires detailed assessment using comprehensive imaging methods. Further complicating matter is that the clinical sequelae associated with OVCF typically involves asymptomatic findings and variable pain patterns. The purpose of this study was to identify clinical characteristics and assessment findings that were associated with a diagnosis of OVCF. The study evaluated routine clinical findings in over 1400 subjects seen at an adult spine surgery clinic for thoracolumbar spine-related conditions within the years 2005-2009. All patients underwent a standardized clinical examination that included a self-report, observational, physical examination and imaging assessment. The diagnosis of OVCF was made after assessment of radiographic findings in sagittal alignment, vertebral body compression, and spinal canal dimensions. Data from the patient history and observational findings were then statistically analyzed and compared between those patients with a diagnosis of OVCF and those with an alternative diagnosis. Based on the results, a diagnostic support tool was created to predict the likelihood of OVCF. The most diagnostic combination included a cluster of: (1) age > 52 years; (2) no presence of leg pain; (3) body mass index ⩽ 22; (4) does not exercise regularly; and (5) female gender. A finding of two of five positive tests or less demonstrated high sensitivity of 0.95 (95% CI  =  0.83-0.99) and low negative likelihood ratio of 0.16 (95% CI  =  0.04-0.51), providing moderate value to rule out OVCF. Four of five yielded a positive likelihood ratio (LR+) of 9.6 (95% CI  =  3.7-14.9) providing moderate value in ruling in the diagnosis of OVCF. Further validation is necessary prospectively to determine the value of these findings on a disparate sample of patients in other unique environments.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Clinical prediction rule; Compression fracture; Lumbar spine; Osteoporosis; Radiograph

Year:  2010        PMID: 21655423      PMCID: PMC3103109          DOI: 10.1179/106698110X12595770849641

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Man Manip Ther        ISSN: 1066-9817


  38 in total

1.  Interpreting SF-36 summary health measures: a response.

Authors:  J E Ware; M Kosinski
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  The relationship between bone density and incident vertebral fracture in men and women.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 6.741

3.  Percutaneous treatment of vertebral compression fractures: a meta-analysis of complications.

Authors:  Michael J Lee; Mark Dumonski; Patrick Cahill; Tom Stanley; Daniel Park; Kern Singh
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2009-05-15       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Postmenopausal spinal osteoporosis: flexion versus extension exercises.

Authors:  M Sinaki; B A Mikkelsen
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1984-10       Impact factor: 3.966

Review 5.  Musculoskeletal rehabilitation in osteoporosis: a review.

Authors:  Michael Pfeifer; Mehrsheed Sinaki; Piet Geusens; Steven Boonen; Elisabeth Preisinger; Helmut W Minne
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2004-05-10       Impact factor: 6.741

6.  Identification and validation of vertebral compression fractures using administrative claims data.

Authors:  Jeffrey R Curtis; Amy S Mudano; Daniel H Solomon; Juan Xi; Mary Elkins Melton; Kenneth G Saag
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 2.983

7.  Stronger back muscles reduce the incidence of vertebral fractures: a prospective 10 year follow-up of postmenopausal women.

Authors:  M Sinaki; E Itoi; H W Wahner; P Wollan; R Gelzcer; B P Mullan; D A Collins; S F Hodgson
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 4.398

Review 8.  Diagnostic evaluation of low back pain with emphasis on imaging.

Authors:  Jeffrey G Jarvik; Richard A Deyo
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2002-10-01       Impact factor: 25.391

9.  Misleading history of pain location in 51 patients with osteoporotic vertebral fractures.

Authors:  Martin Friedrich; Georg Gittler; Elisabeth Pieler-Bruha
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-02-07       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  10-year probability of recurrent fractures following wrist and other osteoporotic fractures in a large clinical cohort: an analysis from the Manitoba Bone Density Program.

Authors:  Anthony B Hodsman; William D Leslie; James F Tsang; Greg D Gamble
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2008-11-10
View more
  7 in total

1.  Diagnostic accuracy of physical examination tests of the ankle/foot complex: a systematic review.

Authors:  Braun Schwieterman; Deniele Haas; Kirby Columber; Darren Knupp; Chad Cook
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2013-08

2.  Differences in comorbidities on low back pain and low back related leg pain.

Authors:  Adam Goode; Chad Cook; Christopher Brown; Robert Isaacs; Matthew Roman; William Richardson
Journal:  Pain Pract       Date:  2011 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.183

Review 3.  Red flags presented in current low back pain guidelines: a review.

Authors:  Arianne P Verhagen; Aron Downie; Nahid Popal; Chris Maher; Bart W Koes
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-07-04       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 4.  Red flags to screen for malignancy and fracture in patients with low back pain: systematic review.

Authors:  Aron Downie; Christopher M Williams; Nicholas Henschke; Mark J Hancock; Raymond W J G Ostelo; Henrica C W de Vet; Petra Macaskill; Les Irwig; Maurits W van Tulder; Bart W Koes; Christopher G Maher
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2013-12-11

Review 5.  Clinical classification in low back pain: best-evidence diagnostic rules based on systematic reviews.

Authors:  Tom Petersen; Mark Laslett; Carsten Juhl
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2017-05-12       Impact factor: 2.362

6.  Development of a clinical decision support tool for diagnostic imaging use in patients with low back pain: a study protocol.

Authors:  Jill A Hayden; Rachel Ogilvie; Samuel Alan Stewart; Simon French; Samuel Campbell; Kirk Magee; Patrick Slipp; George Wells; Ian Stiell
Journal:  Diagn Progn Res       Date:  2019-01-14

7.  Finite element analysis of dynamic changes in spinal mechanics of osteoporotic lumbar fracture.

Authors:  Jianwen Yan; Zhong Liao; Yafang Yu
Journal:  Eur J Med Res       Date:  2022-08-06       Impact factor: 4.981

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.