Literature DB >> 21655341

Management of type 2 diabetes mellitus in the elderly: role of the pharmacist in a multidisciplinary health care team.

Samuel Grossman1.   

Abstract

Intensive glycemic control using insulin therapy may be appropriate for many healthy older adults to reduce premature mortality and morbidity, improve quality of life, and reduce health care costs. However, frail elderly people are more prone to develop complications from hypoglycemia, such as confusion and dementia. Overall, older persons with type 2 diabetes mellitus are at greater risk of death from cardiovascular disease (CVD) than from intermittent hyperglycemia; therefore, diabetes management should always include CVD prevention and treatment in this patient population. Pharmacists can provide a comprehensive medication review with subsequent recommendations to individualize therapy based on medical and cognitive status. As part of the patient's health care team, pharmacists can provide continuity of care and communication with other members of the patient's health care team. In addition, pharmacists can act as educators and patient advocates and establish patient-specific goals to increase medication effectiveness, adherence to a medication regimen, and minimize the likelihood of adverse events.

Entities:  

Keywords:  continuity of care; elderly; glycemic control; hyperglycemia; hypertension and cardiovascular disease; pharmacist; type 2 diabetes

Year:  2011        PMID: 21655341      PMCID: PMC3104686          DOI: 10.2147/JMDH.S21111

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Multidiscip Healthc        ISSN: 1178-2390


Introduction

More than 20% of elderly Americans (65 years or older) have type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).1 T2DM is associated with increased morbidity and mortality in the elderly,2 and half of elderly patients receiving diabetes treatment do not achieve adequate glycemic control.3 Although glycemic control is important, elderly patients with diabetes are more likely to benefit from the additional treatment for hypertension and cardiovascular disease (CVD) than with only tight glycemic control.1 Compared with a younger cohort, older Americans with diabetes are more likely to have geriatric syndrome, which is a cluster of conditions that include injurious falls, cognitive impairment, and depression.4 These conditions can complicate the management of diabetes and increase the likelihood of hypoglycemia, confusion, and dementia. As part of the patient’s health care team, pharmacists can act as educators and patient advocates and establish patient-specific goals to increase medication effectiveness and adherence to their medication regimen, and minimize adverse events. For example, pharmacists who participated in the Diabetes Ten City Challenge (DTCC) provided coaching, used evidence-based diabetes care guidelines, and implemented patient self-management strategies, which resulted in reductions in glycosylated hemoglobin, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and systolic blood pressure in 573 patients with diabetes after 1 year of follow-up.5 Pharmacists referred patients to physicians for further assessment, contacted other providers (such as a dietitian) for intensive nutrition education, or communicated with diabetes education centers for additional education support.

Special considerations for elderly patients with diabetes

Elderly persons are more likely to develop and be more susceptible to diabetes-related complications.1 In particular, this population should be evaluated for complications that develop over short periods of time and/or for those that would significantly impair functional status, such as vision and lower-extremity complications (ie, peripheral neuropathy and subsequent diabetic foot infections). Diabetes treatment-related complications may be more problematic in elderly persons than in the nonelderly; for example, hypoglycemia may aggravate dementia6 and can increase the risk of falls. Elderly persons may be at greater risk than younger patients for comorbid conditions such as depression, which can lead to treatment apathy and reduced medication effectiveness. Adherence to a prescribed medication regimen should not be assumed. About 30% of Medicare patients with medication coverage are nonadherent to their medication regimens for financial reasons.7 Patients who repeatedly miss medical appointments may be at increased risk for nonadherence and will likely require diligent follow-up measures to resolve underlying issues. A comprehensive medication review by the pharmacist, which includes medication adherence and individual strategies to decrease nonadherence, can help identify other medication-related issues. Elderly patients may not be able to read their medication instructions or understand how to take the medications; these issues can be addressed with additional education and repeated interventions. Taking multiple drugs several times a day can lead to medication errors, adverse events, reduced medication efficacy, increased costs, and poor regimen adherence.8 Polypharmacy is common, as elderly persons tend to keep medications that were prescribed years ago, and may keep medications that were switched to another drug within the same drug class after a hospitalization. Medication reconciliation should include discontinuing medications that are a therapeutic duplication, or that contain the same active ingredient but were prescribed as a different formulation or as part of a combination drug. Diabetes self-management weaknesses and the patient’s history of hypoglycemic events should be addressed by a pharmacist and other health care providers so action can be taken to prevent future events. Assessing for cognitive decline or depression is necessary to differentiate these disorders from symptoms related to hypoglycemia. If a patient is diagnosed with and treated for depression, the patient should be reevaluated to assess treatment efficacy and symptom improvement. Working with the patient and prescribers to simplify treatment regimens may increase medication regimen adherence, minimize adverse effects, and increase medication effectiveness.

Diabetes treatment guidelines for the elderly

Treatment goals should be developed and achieved in line with the elderly patient’s medical, functional, social, and financial status.4 Aggressive treatment is appropriate for most healthy older adults to reduce premature mortality and morbidity, improve quality of life, and reduce health care costs.1 These patients may benefit from regimens that include insulin to allow dosage adjustment with food intake and level of exercise. However, due to a patient’s advancing age, treatment decisions become more complex, and their capacity to cope with adverse effects and complicated treatment regimens declines. To minimize the risk of hypoglycemia and associated complications such as falls or confusion, less aggressive fasting glucose targets may be necessary for frail elderly patients9 (those with an unintentional weight loss of 10 pounds in the past year, chronic exhaustion, and low grip strength, walking speed, and physical activity).10 For these frail elderly patients, treatment selection should include therapies with a low risk of hypoglycemia, such as metformin or an incretin mimetic; therapies with a high risk of hypoglycemia, such as long-acting sulfonylureas (ie, chlorpropamide or glyburide), should be avoided. The long-term benefits of tight control of fasting blood glucose will likely not be observed in patients with advanced age. Cardiovascular disease is a leading cause of death in this population,11 and a greater reduction in morbidity and mortality is expected by controlling CVD risk factors.12 Elevated postprandial glucose (PPG) levels may increase the risk of CVD.13 Data on PPG control in the elderly are limited; however, selecting drug therapy that targets PPG should be considered to further reduce CVD risk. Elderly patients and caregivers should be educated about controlling CVD risk factors by discussing the importance of smoking cessation and blood pressure control. Pharmacists can provide continuity of care by communicating changes in over-the-counter medications or herbal therapies to the patient’s prescriber and other health care team members.

Treatment options for diabetes in the elderly

Dietary changes may only moderately help with glycemic control in the elderly. These patients may have defective dentition, loss of taste/poor appetite, or an unwillingness to change a lifetime of eating habits.9 Elderly patients should consult with a dietitian to create a well balanced diet that facilitates weight loss (if needed) and helps maintain glycemic control.14 Exercise should be consistent and based on what the patient can tolerate. Preferably, these patients should walk or swim for 30 minutes a day to maintain muscle conditioning.9 Foot and eye care should be discussed with the patient. Pharmacists should review nonpharmacologic therapy, including lifestyle modifications, to determine if any changes could be made to improve effectiveness of recommended nonpharmacologic interventions. In addition, the pharmacist could discuss daily foot care, and could conduct a basic foot exam to assess pedal pulses, abnormalities in anatomy, and changes in sensation. Pharmacologic treatment options are briefly presented in Table 1.1,4,9,14–19 To assess the effectiveness and safety of antihyperglycemic medications, the pharmacist should carefully monitor glucose levels (including PPG), weight, renal function, and blood pressure. Elderly persons are more likely to have renal dysfunction than other adults. Therefore, medications such as metformin should be used with caution in these patients because of the risk of developing lactic acidosis, a rare but potentially fatal adverse effect that is more common in those with renal dysfunction. Gastrointestinal adverse effects can be debilitating in the older person. For example, glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) agonists are associated with treatment-limiting nausea; however, these agents have a low risk of hypoglycemia. The pharmacist can discuss ways to reduce or manage drug-induced nausea or recommend switching to a therapy with a low risk of this adverse effect. Clinician inertia, delaying insulin therapy because of fears of hypoglycemia, and perceived lack of benefit can also be addressed by a pharmacist by communicating patient-specific needs to other members of the health care team.
Table 1

Summary points for drugs used to treat diabetes in the elderly

Drug class/namePossible drug or disease interactionsAdverse events that may limit useImportant notes
Alpha-glucosidase inhibitors9Erratic oral intake; must take with main meals to be effectiveGastrointestinal effectsAdjust dose with renal or liver dysfunction
Meglitinides1Incretin therapiesDPP-4 inhibitors15Frequent daily dosingConcomitant use with insulin secretagogues increases risk of hypoglycemiaHypoglycemia, weight gainHeadache, infection, dermatologic effects16Rapid onset

Effects are glucose dependent, so low risk for hypoglycemia

Weight neutral

Target PPG levels

Incretin therapiesGLP-1 agonists15Concomitant use with insulin secretagogues increases risk of hypoglycemiaGastrointestinal effects (less than alpha-glucosidase inhibitors),15 pancreatitis, immune reactions (incidence less with liraglutide than exenatide)16

Effects are glucose dependent, so low risk for hypoglycemia

Weight loss

Target PPG levels

Decrease blood pressure; improve other CVD markers16

Insulins17,18Erratic oral intake can increase risk of hypoglycemia; low vision and dexterity may limit use of vial and syringes, clinician inertiaHypoglycemia

Better glycemic control if difficulty adhering to oral medications, receiving multiple oral medications, or not achieving glycemic targets than with oral medications alone

Early use may restore and improve beta-cell function

Insulin pens increase adherence for patients with low vision and/or dexterity issues

Metformin1Impaired renal functionLactic acidosis (rare but serious), gastrointestinal effects

Measure serum creatinine and liver function periodically and with any increase in dose

Weight neutral versus placebo19

Avoid initiating in patients ≥80 years of age unless creatinine clearance is within normal limits

Pioglitazone14Class III and class IV congestive heart failureWeight gain, fluid retention, peripheral edema, fractures among women19Hypoglycemia rare
Sulfonylureas4Erratic oral intake can increase risk of hypoglycemia with long-acting agentsHypoglycemia, weight gainAvoid long-acting sulfonylureas; short-acting (ie, glipizide) minimize risk of nocturnal hypoglycemia, and may also help avoid hypoglycemia in patients with erratic oral intake

Abbreviations: CVD, cardiovascular disease; DPP-4, dipeptidyl peptidase IV; GLP-1, glucagon-like peptide 1; NPH, neutral protamine Hagedorn; PPG, postprandial glucose.

As an individual ages, beta-cell function declines. Studies suggest that early use of insulin in the elderly restores and improves beta-cell function and induces disease remission.18,20 Simple insulin regimens with premeasured doses and easier injection systems (eg, insulin pens with easy-to-set dosages) are preferred in the elderly patient.21 Timing of insulin doses relative to meals and adjusting doses based on meal content and caloric intake minimize the risk of hypoglycemia. For some elderly people, two daily injections using premixed insulin analog preparations or a long-acting insulin analog for basal control may be preferred to multiple oral medications. Fasting and post-prandial glucose levels should be monitored and assessed to determine if target levels have been obtained. If control is unsatisfactory, a dose of rapid-acting insulin analog for prandial glucose control during the main meal could be added to the basal regimen. For the healthy older person, a combination of rapid- and long-acting insulin analogs would provide tight glycemic control and allow dosing flexibility. Elderly people who are not frail are more likely to benefit from long-term tight glycemic control, which is associated with a reduced risk of diabetes-related microvascular complications and amputations. In addition, long-acting insulin analogs do not have the pronounced peak observed with neutral protamine Hagedorn (NPH) insulin and are less likely to produce nocturnal hypoglycemia.22 Pharmacists are in a key position to improve diabetes control in this potentially high-risk population. In observational and controlled trials, medication management and diabetes education provided by the pharmacist has been reported to improve A1c, blood pressure, and lipid parameters.23 In addition, these services increase patient satisfaction and decrease health care costs. The DTCC is an example of how pharmacy practice around the country is evolving to include patient education, medication therapy management, basic physical assessment, routine patient and caregiver follow up, and constant collaboration with other health care providers.5 A brief list of recently published primary literature evaluating clinical outcomes and pharmacist-provided diabetes care of the older patient is provided in Table 2.5,24,25
Table 2

Pharmacist-provided patient care and associated outcomes in older patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus

StudyMethodsResults
Cranor et al24

Quasi-experimental, longitudinal, pre and post cohort trial design

12 community-based pharmacists trained in diabetes education

Asheville Project

Change in clinical and economic outcomes before and after up to 5 years of implementation of services

n = 620 financial cohort, n = 565 clinical cohort

Baseline median age 48 years

Median A1c decreased by 0.8% after first follow-up visit (P < 0.001)

LDL-C decreased by 2.5 mg/dL after the first follow-up visit (P = 0.13)

Total direct medical costs decreased by US$1662–$3356 per patient per year depending on the follow-up year, despite increases in mean prescription costs

Fera et al5

Prospective, observational, pre- and post-cohort trial design

Collaborative practice model

Community-based pharmacists

Evidence-based guidelines

Clinical and economic outcomes

Diabetes Ten City Challenge

Change in clinical and economic outcomes before and after 1 year of implementation of services

N = 573

42% were 60 years or older

Mean A1c decreased by 0.4% (P = 0.002)

Mean LDL-C decreased by 4 mg/dL (P < 0.001)

Mean SBP decreased by 3 mmHg (P < 0.001)

Average total health care costs per patient per year decreased by US$1079 (7.2%)

Influenza vaccination rate increased by 33%

Foot examination rate increased by 40%

Jameson and Baty25

Prospective, randomized, controlled trial

Pharmacist management versus usual medical care

Change in A1c after 1 year of care

Poorly controlled diabetes (A1c > 9%)

One pharmacist with advanced diabetes education training

Intervention consisted of targeted patient outreach program plus medication management, patient education, disease control by a pharmacist

Control group used targeted patient outreach programs and registries

N = 103 (intervention group n = 52, control group n = 51)

Mean age 49 years

Mean A1c decreased by 1.5% for the intervention group and 0.4% for the control group (P = 0.06)

A1c decreased by at least 1% for 67.3% versus 41.2%, respectively (P = 0.02)

Male and nonwhite patients had greater improvement in A1c than female or white patients

Abbreviations: A1c, glycosylated hemoglobin; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; SBP, systolic blood pressure.

Older persons with diabetes are at greater risk of death from CVD than from intermittent hyperglycemia. Frail elderly people are more prone to develop complications from hypoglycemia, such as confusion and dementia. Continuity of care, communication with other members of the patient’s health care team, and a comprehensive medication review by the pharmacist, with subsequent recommendations to individualize therapy based on medical and cognitive status, will minimize adverse effects and optimize treatment effectiveness.
  21 in total

1.  Guidelines for improving the care of the older person with diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Arlene F Brown; Carol M Mangione; Debra Saliba; Catherine A Sarkisian
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 5.562

2.  The Asheville Project: long-term clinical and economic outcomes of a community pharmacy diabetes care program.

Authors:  Carole W Cranor; Barry A Bunting; Dale B Christensen
Journal:  J Am Pharm Assoc (Wash)       Date:  2003 Mar-Apr

3.  Medication adherence and the associated health-economic impact among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus converting to insulin pen therapy: an analysis of third-party managed care claims data.

Authors:  Won Chan Lee; Sanjeev Balu; David Cobden; Ashish V Joshi; Chris L Pashos
Journal:  Clin Ther       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 3.393

Review 4.  Importance of postprandial glucose levels as a target for glycemic control in type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  Joseph Tibaldi
Journal:  South Med J       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 0.954

5.  Insulin devices: addressing barriers to insulin therapy with the ideal pen.

Authors:  Geralyn Spollett
Journal:  Diabetes Educ       Date:  2008 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.140

6.  Diabetes Ten City Challenge: final economic and clinical results.

Authors:  Toni Fera; Benjamin M Bluml; William M Ellis
Journal:  J Am Pharm Assoc (2003)       Date:  2009 May-Jun

Review 7.  Effects of pharmacist outpatient interventions on adults with diabetes mellitus: a systematic review.

Authors:  Deborah P Wubben; Eva M Vivian
Journal:  Pharmacotherapy       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 4.705

8.  Comorbid conditions and glycemic control in elderly patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, 1988 to 1994 to 1999 to 2004.

Authors:  Dong-Churl Suh; Chul-Min Kim; In-Sun Choi; Craig A Plauschinat
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2008-01-02       Impact factor: 5.562

Review 9.  Transitioning and adjusting insulin analog therapy in elderly patients.

Authors:  Bryan Bray
Journal:  Consult Pharm       Date:  2008-04

Review 10.  New approaches to treating type 2 diabetes mellitus in the elderly: role of incretin therapies.

Authors:  Angela M Abbatecola; Stefania Maggi; Giuseppe Paolisso
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 3.923

View more
  3 in total

1.  A training program for pharmacy students on providing diabetes care.

Authors:  Supakit Wongwiwatthananukit; Paula Zeszotarski; Anthony Thai; RaeAnne Fuller; Yaw Owusu; Candace Tan; Lara Gomez; Scott Holuby
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2013-09-12       Impact factor: 2.047

2.  Efficacy and safety of insulin glargine compared to other interventions in younger and older adults: a pooled analysis of nine open-label, randomized controlled trials in patients with type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  Naushira Pandya; Andres DiGenio; Ling Gao; Meenakshi Patel
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 3.923

3.  Long-term training in diabetes-related knowledge, attitudes, and self-reported practice among diabetes liaison nurses.

Authors:  Wen Zhou; Jin Huang; Lingfeng Yang; Tieying Qiu; Yan Zhang; Fang Liu; Zhiguang Zhou
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2019-10-29       Impact factor: 1.671

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.