BACKGROUND: Cancer pain is highly prevalent, and existing treatments are often insufficient to provide adequate relief. OBJECTIVES: We assessed the long-term safety and efficacy of subcutaneous tetrodotoxin treatment in reducing the intensity of chronic cancer-related pain. METHODS: In this multicentre open-label longitudinal trial, 30 μg tetrodotoxin was administered subcutaneously twice daily for 4 days in a heterogeneous cohort of patients with persistent pain despite opioids and other analgesics. "Responder" was defined as a mean reduction of 30% or more in pain intensity from baseline; and "clinical responder" as some pain reduction, but less than 30%, plus agreement on the part of both the patient and the physician that a meaningful analgesic response to treatment had occurred. RESULTS: Of 45 patients who entered the longitudinal trial, 41 had sufficient data for analysis. Of all 45 patients, 21 (47%) met the criteria for "responder" [16 patients (36%)] or "clinical responder" [5 patients (11%)]. Onset of pain relief was typically cumulative over days, and after administration ended, the analgesic effect subsided over the course of a few weeks. No evidence of loss of analgesic effect was observed during subsequent treatments (2526 patient-days in total and a maximum of 400 days in 1 patient). One patient withdrew from the study because of adverse events. Toxicity was usually mild (82%) or moderate (13%), and remained so through subsequent treatment cycles, with no evidence of cumulative toxicity or tolerance. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term treatment with tetrodotoxin is associated with acceptable toxicity and, in a substantial minority of patients, resulted in a sustained analgesic effect. Further study of tetrodotoxin for moderate-to-severe cancer pain is warranted.
BACKGROUND:Cancer pain is highly prevalent, and existing treatments are often insufficient to provide adequate relief. OBJECTIVES: We assessed the long-term safety and efficacy of subcutaneous tetrodotoxin treatment in reducing the intensity of chronic cancer-related pain. METHODS: In this multicentre open-label longitudinal trial, 30 μg tetrodotoxin was administered subcutaneously twice daily for 4 days in a heterogeneous cohort of patients with persistent pain despite opioids and other analgesics. "Responder" was defined as a mean reduction of 30% or more in pain intensity from baseline; and "clinical responder" as some pain reduction, but less than 30%, plus agreement on the part of both the patient and the physician that a meaningful analgesic response to treatment had occurred. RESULTS: Of 45 patients who entered the longitudinal trial, 41 had sufficient data for analysis. Of all 45 patients, 21 (47%) met the criteria for "responder" [16 patients (36%)] or "clinical responder" [5 patients (11%)]. Onset of pain relief was typically cumulative over days, and after administration ended, the analgesic effect subsided over the course of a few weeks. No evidence of loss of analgesic effect was observed during subsequent treatments (2526 patient-days in total and a maximum of 400 days in 1 patient). One patient withdrew from the study because of adverse events. Toxicity was usually mild (82%) or moderate (13%), and remained so through subsequent treatment cycles, with no evidence of cumulative toxicity or tolerance. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term treatment with tetrodotoxin is associated with acceptable toxicity and, in a substantial minority of patients, resulted in a sustained analgesic effect. Further study of tetrodotoxin for moderate-to-severe cancer pain is warranted.
Authors: Neil A Hagen; Patrick du Souich; Bernard Lapointe; May Ong-Lam; Benoit Dubuc; David Walde; Robin Love; Anh Ho Ngoc Journal: J Pain Symptom Manage Date: 2008-02-04 Impact factor: 3.612
Authors: Andelain Erickson; Annemie Deiteren; Andrea M Harrington; Sonia Garcia-Caraballo; Joel Castro; Ashlee Caldwell; Luke Grundy; Stuart M Brierley Journal: J Physiol Date: 2018-02-06 Impact factor: 5.182
Authors: Dan M McEntire; Daniel R Kirkpatrick; Nicholas P Dueck; Mitchell J Kerfeld; Tyler A Smith; Taylor J Nelson; Mark D Reisbig; Devendra K Agrawal Journal: Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol Date: 2016-05-23 Impact factor: 5.045
Authors: Maria Carmen Louzao; Natalia Vilariño; Carmen Vale; Celia Costas; Alejandro Cao; Sandra Raposo-Garcia; Mercedes R Vieytes; Luis M Botana Journal: Mar Drugs Date: 2022-03-08 Impact factor: 5.118
Authors: Francisco Rafael Nieto; Enrique José Cobos; Miguel Ángel Tejada; Cristina Sánchez-Fernández; Rafael González-Cano; Cruz Miguel Cendán Journal: Mar Drugs Date: 2012-01-31 Impact factor: 6.085