| Literature DB >> 21655143 |
Kazuto Sazawa1, Masaki Tachi, Takatoshi Wakimoto, Takanori Kawakami, Noriko Hata, Shigeru Taguchi, Hideki Kuramitz.
Abstract
The dissolvedEntities:
Keywords: dissolved organic matter; humic-like components; land usage; protein-like components; river water; three-dimensional excitation-emission matrix
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2011 PMID: 21655143 PMCID: PMC3108133 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph8051655
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Figure 1.The location of Oyabe River, Shou River, Jinzu River, and Jyouganji River in Toyama, Japan and the sampling sites.
Figure 2.The land use management map for Toyama, Japan.
The parameters for water quality of Oyabe River, Shou River, Jinzu River and Jyouganji River.
| 1 | 8.01 | 0.607 | 1 | 0.11 | 0.86 | 0.25 | 13.6 | 7.12 | 0.16 | 1.09 | 63.4 | |
| 2 | 7.58 | 0.724 | 8 | 0.17 | 0.76 | 0.34 | 73.5 | 27.2 | 0.11 | 0.98 | 10.4 | |
| 3 | 7.68 | 0.887 | 8 | 0.19 | 0.83 | 0.33 | 36.4 | 18.9 | 0.12 | 0.80 | 22.8 | |
| 4 | 7.19 | 1.098 | 5 | 0.28 | 0.97 | 0.42 | 68.1 | 34.5 | 0.12 | 1.16 | 14.2 | |
| 1 | 7.37 | 0.541 | 6 | 0.14 | 0.51 | 0.17 | 40.3 | 9.93 | 0.07 | 0.74 | 12.6 | |
| 2 | 7.58 | 0.537 | 7 | 0.15 | 0.59 | 0.17 | 12.6 | 3.37 | 0.07 | 0.64 | 46.7 | |
| 3 | 7.76 | 0.547 | N.D. | 0.11 | 0.70 | 0.18 | 13.1 | 5.62 | 0.08 | 0.76 | 53.7 | |
| 4 | 7.74 | 0.555 | N.D. | 0.28 | 0.56 | 0.18 | 9.41 | 3.56 | 0.07 | 0.68 | 60.0 | |
| 1 | 7.26 | 0.741 | N.D. | 0.03 | 0.73 | 0.26 | 16.5 | 13.9 | 0.06 | 0.88 | 44.3 | |
| 2 | 7.33 | 0.758 | N.D. | 0.06 | 0.87 | 0.27 | 12.5 | 11.2 | 0.06 | 0.78 | 69.8 | |
| 3 | 7.33 | 0.752 | N.D. | 0.06 | 0.73 | 0.30 | 15.5 | 11.2 | 0.07 | 0.78 | 47.3 | |
| 4 | 7.22 | 1.025 | N.D. | 0.12 | 1.64 | 0.59 | 27.5 | 13.7 | 0.07 | 1.15 | 59.7 | |
| 1 | 7.71 | 0.660 | N.D. | 0.09 | 0.59 | 0.24 | 8.54 | 2.62 | 0.06 | 0.73 | 69.1 | |
| 2 | 7.38 | 0.832 | N.D. | 0.10 | 0.57 | 0.20 | 8.42 | 3.56 | 0.05 | 0.63 | 67.8 | |
| 3 | 7.40 | 0.800 | N.D. | 0.07 | 0.57 | 0.24 | 8.57 | 2.43 | 0.05 | 0.46 | 66.5 | |
| 4 | 7.37 | 0.773 | 12 | 0.02 | 0.66 | 0.23 | 7.69 | 3.37 | 0.05 | 0.63 | 86.4 | |
| 5 | 7.33 | 0.827 | 4 | 0.17 | 0.79 | 0.24 | 11.5 | 5.81 | 0.03 | 0.78 | 68.7 | |
Figure 3.An example of the 3DEEM fluorescence spectrum for the river water sample collected from site 4 of Oyabe River. The bar chart next to the graph indicates contour intervals of the fluorescence intensity in the quinine sulfate normalization (QSU).
The RFI of each peak obtained from 3DEEM spectra of the river water samples. The RFI values for peak A, peak M, peak N, peak B and peak T were obtained from the peak’s position at 240/420, 290/370, 280/370, 270/370 and 220/345 (Ex./Em.) nm.
| 1 | 330/440 | 5.19 | 1.61 | 4.35 | 1.77 | 0.55 | 0.21 | |
| 2 | 330/445 | 7.34 | 2.21 | 6.32 | 2.95 | 0.63 | 0.67 | |
| 3 | 330/440 | 6.21 | 2.20 | 5.69 | 3.15 | 1.13 | 1.35 | |
| 4 | 330/440 | 8.17 | 7.51 | 7.27 | 2.83 | 1.13 | 10.8 | |
| 1 | 330/445 | 2.91 | 0.96 | 2.19 | 0.51 | 0.19 | 0.33 | |
| 2 | 330/445 | 1.99 | 0.95 | 1.47 | 0.23 | 0.10 | 0.07 | |
| 3 | 330/445 | 2.24 | 0.98 | 1.62 | 0.49 | 0.15 | 0.17 | |
| 4 | 330/445 | 2.16 | 1.01 | 1.79 | 0.40 | 0.16 | 0.00 | |
| 1 | 340/445 | 3.21 | 0.00 | 2.55 | 0.39 | 0.02 | 0.00 | |
| 2 | 330/445 | 3.46 | 1.47 | 2.61 | 0.71 | 0.31 | 0.44 | |
| 3 | 330/440 | 2.98 | 1.38 | 2.35 | 0.63 | 0.17 | 0.22 | |
| 4 | 330/440 | 3.65 | 1.31 | 3.05 | 0.82 | 0.28 | 0.33 | |
| 1 | 330/440 | 1.85 | 0.00 | 2.39 | 1.95 | 0.35 | 0.00 | |
| 2 | 340/410 | 2.40 | 1.31 | 1.64 | 1.06 | 0.45 | 0.38 | |
| 3 | 340/450 | 1.63 | 0.91 | 1.26 | 0.45 | 0.15 | 0.42 | |
| 4 | 330/445 | 2.17 | 1.10 | 2.40 | 0.43 | 0.31 | 0.34 | |
| 5 | 330/440 | 2.86 | 1.10 | 1.45 | 0.68 | 0.38 | 0.27 | |
Figure 4.The patterns of RFI values at six fluorescent peaks (peak C, peak A, peak M, peak N, peak B and peak T) obtained from 3DEEM spectra for each water sample collected from (a) Oyabe River; (b) Shou River; (c) Jinzu River; and (d) Jyouganji River.
The RFI of each peak obtained from 3DEEM spectra of the sewage treatment water and agricultural water for paddy. The RFI values for the peak A, peak M, peak N, peak B and peak T were selected from the peak position at 240/420, 290/370, 280/370, 270/370 and 220/345 (Ex./Em.) nm.
| 340/440 | 66.0 | 5.56 | 28.5 | 21.3 | 13.3 | 0.65 | |
| 325/445 | 7.93 | 1.43 | 2.66 | 2.11 | 1.51 | 0.11 | |
Figure 5.Relationship between fluorescence intensity of (a) peak C; (b) peak A; (c) peak M; (d) peak N; (e) peak B; and (f) peak T and concentration of DOC. The samples were collected from Oyabe River (▪), Shou River (○), Jinzu River (▵) and Jyouganji River (♦).
The values of FIX, HIX, and BIX for Oyabe River, Shou River, Jinzu River, Jyouganji River, sewage treatment water, and agricultural water for paddy.
| 1 | 1.39 | 6.23 | 0.55 | |
| 2 | 1.43 | 4.58 | 0.63 | |
| 3 | 1.47 | 3.03 | 0.69 | |
| 4 | 1.60 | 4.47 | 0.72 | |
| 1 | 1.27 | 9.38 | 0.55 | |
| 2 | 1.28 | 28.92 | 0.55 | |
| 3 | 1.30 | 11.09 | 0.55 | |
| 4 | 1.29 | 13.52 | 0.54 | |
| 1 | 1.46 | 356.66 | 0.56 | |
| 2 | 1.35 | 6.91 | 0.54 | |
| 3 | 1.34 | 10.82 | 0.57 | |
| 4 | 1.35 | 14.22 | 0.56 | |
| 1 | 1.28 | 4.21 | 0.96 | |
| 2 | 1.49 | 2.85 | 0.66 | |
| 3 | 1.25 | 5.58 | 0.53 | |
| 4 | 1.31 | 8.21 | 0.63 | |
| 5 | 1.39 | 6.31 | 0.57 | |
| 1.40 | 3.22 | 0.92 | ||
| 0.92 | 5.32 | 0.61 | ||
| 1.2 | 48 | 0.4 | ||