| Literature DB >> 21655143 |
Kazuto Sazawa1, Masaki Tachi, Takatoshi Wakimoto, Takanori Kawakami, Noriko Hata, Shigeru Taguchi, Hideki Kuramitz.
Abstract
The dissolved organic matter (DOM) is one of the important factors for controllinpan>g water quality. The behavior and constitutions of DOM is related to the risk of human health because it is able to directly or indirectly affect the behavior, speciation and toxicity of various environmental pollutants. However, it is not easy to know the contents of DOM components without using various complicated and time consuming analytical methods because DOM is a complex mixture and usually exists at low concentration. Here, we describe the fluorescence properties of DOM components in water samples collected from four rivers in Toyama, Japan by means of the three-dimensional excitation-emission matrix (3DEEM) fluorescence spectroscopy. In order to evaluate the alterations of DOM components in each of the river during the flow from upstream to downstream, the patterns of relative fluorescence intensity (RFI) at six peaks which are originated from fluorophores including humic-like and protein-like components were investigated. The changes in the patterns of RFI values at each of the peak and the concentration of dissolved organic carbon (DOC) for each river water sample were discussed in connection with the differences of land use managements and basic water quality parameters, such as pH, EC, turbidity, Fe(3+), T-N, NO(3)-N, T-P, PO(4)-P, chlorophyll a, DOC and N/P ratio. The DOC concentrations in the water samples collected from these rivers were relatively low (0.63-1.16 mg/L). Two main peaks which have a strong RFI value expressed a positive correlation with the DOC concentration (r = 0.557, 0.535). However, the correlations between the RFI values for other four peaks and the DOC concentration were below 0.287. The alterations of DOM components during the flow of a river from upstream to downstream were investigated from the changes in the patterns of RFI values for six fluorescent peaks. It was clarified that the great increase of RFI values in peak A and peak T from river water located in urban area showed high concentration of PO(4)-P and Fe(3+), and low N/P ratio due to the high biological activities. The values of fluorescence index (FIX) and biological index (BIX) were as high as 1.60 and 0.72, respectively.Entities:
Keywords: dissolved organic matter; humic-like components; land usage; protein-like components; river water; three-dimensional excitation-emission matrix
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2011 PMID: 21655143 PMCID: PMC3108133 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph8051655
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Figure 1.The location of Oyabe River, Shou River, Jinzu River, and Jyouganji River in Toyama, Japan and the sampling sites.
Figure 2.The land use management map for Toyama, Japan.
The parameters for water quality of Oyabe River, Shou River, Jinzu River and Jyouganji River.
| 1 | 8.01 | 0.607 | 1 | 0.11 | 0.86 | 0.25 | 13.6 | 7.12 | 0.16 | 1.09 | 63.4 | |
| 2 | 7.58 | 0.724 | 8 | 0.17 | 0.76 | 0.34 | 73.5 | 27.2 | 0.11 | 0.98 | 10.4 | |
| 3 | 7.68 | 0.887 | 8 | 0.19 | 0.83 | 0.33 | 36.4 | 18.9 | 0.12 | 0.80 | 22.8 | |
| 4 | 7.19 | 1.098 | 5 | 0.28 | 0.97 | 0.42 | 68.1 | 34.5 | 0.12 | 1.16 | 14.2 | |
| 1 | 7.37 | 0.541 | 6 | 0.14 | 0.51 | 0.17 | 40.3 | 9.93 | 0.07 | 0.74 | 12.6 | |
| 2 | 7.58 | 0.537 | 7 | 0.15 | 0.59 | 0.17 | 12.6 | 3.37 | 0.07 | 0.64 | 46.7 | |
| 3 | 7.76 | 0.547 | N.D. | 0.11 | 0.70 | 0.18 | 13.1 | 5.62 | 0.08 | 0.76 | 53.7 | |
| 4 | 7.74 | 0.555 | N.D. | 0.28 | 0.56 | 0.18 | 9.41 | 3.56 | 0.07 | 0.68 | 60.0 | |
| 1 | 7.26 | 0.741 | N.D. | 0.03 | 0.73 | 0.26 | 16.5 | 13.9 | 0.06 | 0.88 | 44.3 | |
| 2 | 7.33 | 0.758 | N.D. | 0.06 | 0.87 | 0.27 | 12.5 | 11.2 | 0.06 | 0.78 | 69.8 | |
| 3 | 7.33 | 0.752 | N.D. | 0.06 | 0.73 | 0.30 | 15.5 | 11.2 | 0.07 | 0.78 | 47.3 | |
| 4 | 7.22 | 1.025 | N.D. | 0.12 | 1.64 | 0.59 | 27.5 | 13.7 | 0.07 | 1.15 | 59.7 | |
| 1 | 7.71 | 0.660 | N.D. | 0.09 | 0.59 | 0.24 | 8.54 | 2.62 | 0.06 | 0.73 | 69.1 | |
| 2 | 7.38 | 0.832 | N.D. | 0.10 | 0.57 | 0.20 | 8.42 | 3.56 | 0.05 | 0.63 | 67.8 | |
| 3 | 7.40 | 0.800 | N.D. | 0.07 | 0.57 | 0.24 | 8.57 | 2.43 | 0.05 | 0.46 | 66.5 | |
| 4 | 7.37 | 0.773 | 12 | 0.02 | 0.66 | 0.23 | 7.69 | 3.37 | 0.05 | 0.63 | 86.4 | |
| 5 | 7.33 | 0.827 | 4 | 0.17 | 0.79 | 0.24 | 11.5 | 5.81 | 0.03 | 0.78 | 68.7 | |
Figure 3.An example of the 3DEEM fluorescence spectrum for the river water sample collected from site 4 of Oyabe River. The bar chart next to the graph indicates contour intervals of the fluorescence intensity in the quinine sulfate normalization (QSU).
The RFI of each peak obtained from 3DEEM spectra of the river water samples. The RFI values for peak A, peak M, peak N, peak B and peak T were obtained from the peak’s position at 240/420, 290/370, 280/370, 270/370 and 220/345 (Ex./Em.) nm.
| 1 | 330/440 | 5.19 | 1.61 | 4.35 | 1.77 | 0.55 | 0.21 | |
| 2 | 330/445 | 7.34 | 2.21 | 6.32 | 2.95 | 0.63 | 0.67 | |
| 3 | 330/440 | 6.21 | 2.20 | 5.69 | 3.15 | 1.13 | 1.35 | |
| 4 | 330/440 | 8.17 | 7.51 | 7.27 | 2.83 | 1.13 | 10.8 | |
| 1 | 330/445 | 2.91 | 0.96 | 2.19 | 0.51 | 0.19 | 0.33 | |
| 2 | 330/445 | 1.99 | 0.95 | 1.47 | 0.23 | 0.10 | 0.07 | |
| 3 | 330/445 | 2.24 | 0.98 | 1.62 | 0.49 | 0.15 | 0.17 | |
| 4 | 330/445 | 2.16 | 1.01 | 1.79 | 0.40 | 0.16 | 0.00 | |
| 1 | 340/445 | 3.21 | 0.00 | 2.55 | 0.39 | 0.02 | 0.00 | |
| 2 | 330/445 | 3.46 | 1.47 | 2.61 | 0.71 | 0.31 | 0.44 | |
| 3 | 330/440 | 2.98 | 1.38 | 2.35 | 0.63 | 0.17 | 0.22 | |
| 4 | 330/440 | 3.65 | 1.31 | 3.05 | 0.82 | 0.28 | 0.33 | |
| 1 | 330/440 | 1.85 | 0.00 | 2.39 | 1.95 | 0.35 | 0.00 | |
| 2 | 340/410 | 2.40 | 1.31 | 1.64 | 1.06 | 0.45 | 0.38 | |
| 3 | 340/450 | 1.63 | 0.91 | 1.26 | 0.45 | 0.15 | 0.42 | |
| 4 | 330/445 | 2.17 | 1.10 | 2.40 | 0.43 | 0.31 | 0.34 | |
| 5 | 330/440 | 2.86 | 1.10 | 1.45 | 0.68 | 0.38 | 0.27 | |
Figure 4.The patterns of RFI values at six fluorescent peaks (peak C, peak A, peak M, peak N, peak B and peak T) obtained from 3DEEM spectra for each water sample collected from (a) Oyabe River; (b) Shou River; (c) Jinzu River; and (d) Jyouganji River.
The RFI of each peak obtained from 3DEEM spectra of the sewage treatment water and agricultural water for paddy. The RFI values for the peak A, peak M, peak N, peak B and peak T were selected from the peak position at 240/420, 290/370, 280/370, 270/370 and 220/345 (Ex./Em.) nm.
| 340/440 | 66.0 | 5.56 | 28.5 | 21.3 | 13.3 | 0.65 | |
| 325/445 | 7.93 | 1.43 | 2.66 | 2.11 | 1.51 | 0.11 | |
Figure 5.Relationship between fluorescence intensity of (a) peak C; (b) peak A; (c) peak M; (d) peak N; (e) peak B; and (f) peak T and concentration of DOC. The samples were collected from Oyabe River (▪), Shou River (○), Jinzu River (▵) and Jyouganji River (♦).
The values of FIX, HIX, and BIX for Oyabe River, Shou River, Jinzu River, Jyouganji River, sewage treatment water, and agricultural water for paddy.
| 1 | 1.39 | 6.23 | 0.55 | |
| 2 | 1.43 | 4.58 | 0.63 | |
| 3 | 1.47 | 3.03 | 0.69 | |
| 4 | 1.60 | 4.47 | 0.72 | |
| 1 | 1.27 | 9.38 | 0.55 | |
| 2 | 1.28 | 28.92 | 0.55 | |
| 3 | 1.30 | 11.09 | 0.55 | |
| 4 | 1.29 | 13.52 | 0.54 | |
| 1 | 1.46 | 356.66 | 0.56 | |
| 2 | 1.35 | 6.91 | 0.54 | |
| 3 | 1.34 | 10.82 | 0.57 | |
| 4 | 1.35 | 14.22 | 0.56 | |
| 1 | 1.28 | 4.21 | 0.96 | |
| 2 | 1.49 | 2.85 | 0.66 | |
| 3 | 1.25 | 5.58 | 0.53 | |
| 4 | 1.31 | 8.21 | 0.63 | |
| 5 | 1.39 | 6.31 | 0.57 | |
| 1.40 | 3.22 | 0.92 | ||
| 0.92 | 5.32 | 0.61 | ||
| 1.2 | 48 | 0.4 | ||