| Literature DB >> 21654899 |
Ryszard Krzyminiewski, Zdzisław Kruczyński, Bernadeta Dobosz, Anna Zając, Andrzej Mackiewicz, Ewa Leporowska, Sandra Folwaczna.
Abstract
Electronic states of iron ion complexes in human blood from patients with melanoma have been investigated by electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR). The measurements were performed at liquid nitrogen temperature (77 K) on an X-band EPR spectrometer. Numerous types of iron paramagnetic centers have been identified. In several kinds of protein complexes exemplified by methemoglobin, transferrin or ferritin, various forms of trivalent iron have been found. Three groups of patients with typical EPR spectra have been individualized. These groups differed in types and concentration of paramagnetic centers in peripheral blood. A good correlation has been found between the EPR results, the total iron ion complexes concentration and transferrin saturation.Entities:
Year: 2011 PMID: 21654899 PMCID: PMC3082697 DOI: 10.1007/s00723-011-0219-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Appl Magn Reson ISSN: 0937-9347 Impact factor: 0.831
Results of the laboratory examinations of blood of the patients with melanoma
| Patient’s number | EPR spectrum type | Gender W/M | Hb (mmol/l) 7.6–10.0 | Fe (μg/dl) | Tf (g/l) 2.0–3.6 | TIBC (μg/dl) 240–480 | UIBC (μg/dl) 115–350 | Ferr (μg/l) | Transferrin saturation (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | I | W | 7.7 | 54 | 3.1 | 354 | 300 | 16 | 15.3 |
| 2 | III | M | 10.4 | 101 | 2.8 | 324 | 223 | 76 | 31.2 |
| 3 | II | W | 8.0 | 86 | 3.0 | 331 | 245 | 30 | 25.9 |
| 4 | II | W | 8.9 | 86 | 3.0 | 337 | 251 | 65 | 25.5 |
| 5 | III | W | 8.9 | 88 | 3.0 | 336 | 248 | 49 | 26.2 |
| 6 | I | M | 9.8 | 118 | 2.9 | 349 | 231 | 103 | 33.8 |
| 7 | – | M | 8.6 | 86 | 2.7 | 316 | 230 | 248 | 27.2 |
| 8 | – | W | 9.4 | 74 | 2.3 | 270 | 196 | 64 | 27.4 |
| 9 | I | W | 7.6 | 45 | 2.6 | 329 | 284 | 112 | 13.7 |
| 10 | I | M | 9.6 | 106 | 2.8 | 336 | 230 | 175 | 31.6 |
| 11 | II | M | 10.1 | 80 | 2.3 | 290 | 210 | 90 | 27.6 |
| 12 | I | W | 8.9 | 89 | 3.0 | 365 | 276 | 75 | 24.4 |
| 13 | II | W | 7.9 | 59 | 3.0 | 384 | 325 | 81 | 15.4 |
| 14 | I | M | 8.8 | 59a | 3.1 | 398 | 339 | 166 | 14.8 |
| 15 | I | W | 8.6 | 104 | 2.9 | 368 | 264 | 142 | 28.3 |
| 16 | II | W | 8.1 | 79 | 2.4 | 284 | 205 | 137 | 27.8 |
| 17 | – | M | 9.9 | 142 | 2.5 | 330 | 188 | 240 | 43.0 |
| 18 | II | W | 8.3 | 78 | 2.6 | 327 | 249 | 40 | 23.9 |
| 19 | I | W | 8.2 | 83 | 3.2 | 389 | 306 | 35 | 21.3 |
| 20 | I | W | 8.1 | 185a | 2.7 | 324 | 157 | 35 | 54.1a |
| Mean value | 8.8 | 90 | 2.8 | 338 | 248 | 99 | 26.9 | ||
Hb Hemoglobin concentration (mmol/l), Fe iron concentration (μg/dl), Tf transferrin concentration (g/l), TIBC total iron-binding capacity (μg/dl), UIBC unbound iron-binding capacity (μg/dl), Ferr ferritin concentration (μg/l), transferrin saturation (%), W woman, M man
aAbove or below the laboratory norm. For examples of the EPR spectrum types see Figs. 2 and 3
Fig. 2EPR spectrum typical for patients from group II
Fig. 3EPR spectrum typical for patients from group III
Fig. 1EPR spectrum typical for a healthy person
Values of the spectroscopic parameters calculated for all EPR spectra of patients with melanoma
| Patient’s number | EPR signal amplitude for | EPR signal amplitude for | EPR signal amplitude for | EPR signal amplitude for |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0.8 | 1.35 | – | – |
| 2 | 1.4 | 1.5 | 2.15 | 12.3 |
| 3 | 1.4 | 2.0 | – | 4.7 |
| 4 | 1.5 | 1.9 | – | 2.4 |
| 5 | 0.8 | 1.6 | 3.6 | 7.4 |
| 6 | 1.2 | 2.4 | – | – |
| 7 | 0.55 | 0.9 | – | – |
| 8 | 9.2 ( | – | – | – |
| 9 | 0.9 | 1.0 | – | – |
| 10 | 0.9 | 1.95 | – | – |
| 11 | 0.9 | 1.5 | – | 8.5 |
| 12 | 2.0 | 1.9 | – | – |
| 13 | 1.0 | 1.1 | – | 15.1 |
| 14 | 0.7 | 1.4 | – | – |
| 15 | 0.9 | 2.2 | – | – |
| 16 | 0.8 | 2.2 | – | 8.3 |
| 17 | – | 1.9 | – | 4.3 |
| 18 | 0.85 | 1.8 | – | 19.0 |
| 19 | 0.9 | 1.9 | – | – |
| 20 | 0.6 | 3.5 | – | – |
The types of EPR spectra are discussed in text and shown in Figs. 2, 3
Fig. 4Amplitude of the EPR signal as a function of the transferrin saturation for all investigated patients, R 2 = 0.7985 a and for women, R 2 = 0.9298 b