Literature DB >> 21654642

The dose makes the poison.

.   

Abstract

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21654642     DOI: 10.1038/nnano.2011.87

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Nanotechnol        ISSN: 1748-3387            Impact factor:   39.213


× No keyword cloud information.
  7 in total

Review 1.  Particokinetics in vitro: dosimetry considerations for in vitro nanoparticle toxicity assessments.

Authors:  Justin G Teeguarden; Paul M Hinderliter; Galya Orr; Brian D Thrall; Joel G Pounds
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2006-11-10       Impact factor: 4.849

2.  Safety assessment for nanotechnology and nanomedicine: concepts of nanotoxicology.

Authors:  G Oberdörster
Journal:  J Intern Med       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 8.989

3.  Influence of dissolved organic matter on the environmental fate of metals, nanoparticles, and colloids.

Authors:  George R Aiken; Heileen Hsu-Kim; Joseph N Ryan
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2011-03-15       Impact factor: 9.028

Review 4.  Exploring quantitative nanostructure-activity relationships (QNAR) modeling as a tool for predicting biological effects of manufactured nanoparticles.

Authors:  Denis Fourches; Dongqiuye Pu; Alexander Tropsha
Journal:  Comb Chem High Throughput Screen       Date:  2011-03-01       Impact factor: 1.339

Review 5.  The release of engineered nanomaterials to the environment.

Authors:  Fadri Gottschalk; Bernd Nowack
Journal:  J Environ Monit       Date:  2011-03-09

6.  Computational nanotoxicology: Predicting toxicity of nanoparticles.

Authors:  Enrico Burello; Andrew Worth
Journal:  Nat Nanotechnol       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 39.213

7.  Using nano-QSAR to predict the cytotoxicity of metal oxide nanoparticles.

Authors:  Tomasz Puzyn; Bakhtiyor Rasulev; Agnieszka Gajewicz; Xiaoke Hu; Thabitha P Dasari; Andrea Michalkova; Huey-Min Hwang; Andrey Toropov; Danuta Leszczynska; Jerzy Leszczynski
Journal:  Nat Nanotechnol       Date:  2011-02-13       Impact factor: 39.213

  7 in total
  6 in total

1.  Crucial ignored parameters on nanotoxicology: the importance of toxicity assay modifications and "cell vision".

Authors:  Sophie Laurent; Carmen Burtea; Coralie Thirifays; Urs O Häfeli; Morteza Mahmoudi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-01-10       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Perceptions of risk from nanotechnologies and trust in stakeholders: a cross sectional study of public, academic, government and business attitudes.

Authors:  Adam Capon; James Gillespie; Margaret Rolfe; Wayne Smith
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2015-04-26       Impact factor: 3.295

3.  Carbon nanotubes gathered onto silica particles lose their biomimetic properties with the cytoskeleton becoming biocompatible.

Authors:  Elena González-Domínguez; Nerea Iturrioz-Rodríguez; Esperanza Padín-González; Juan Villegas; Lorena García-Hevia; Moisés Pérez-Lorenzo; Wolfgang J Parak; Miguel A Correa-Duarte; Mónica L Fanarraga
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2017-08-29

4.  Remote Actuation of Apoptosis in Liver Cancer Cells via Magneto-Mechanical Modulation of Iron Oxide Nanoparticles.

Authors:  Oleg Lunov; Mariia Uzhytchak; Barbora Smolková; Mariia Lunova; Milan Jirsa; Nora M Dempsey; André L Dias; Marlio Bonfim; Martin Hof; Piotr Jurkiewicz; Yuri Petrenko; Šárka Kubinová; Alexandr Dejneka
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2019-11-26       Impact factor: 6.639

5.  Natural-lipid nanoparticle-based therapeutic approach to deliver 6-shogaol and its metabolites M2 and M13 to the colon to treat ulcerative colitis.

Authors:  Chunhua Yang; Mingzhen Zhang; Sudeep Lama; Lixin Wang; Didier Merlin
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2020-04-23       Impact factor: 9.776

6.  Predictive value of in vitro assays depends on the mechanism of toxicity of metal oxide nanoparticles.

Authors:  Wan-Seob Cho; Rodger Duffin; Mark Bradley; Ian L Megson; William MacNee; Jong Kwon Lee; Jayoung Jeong; Ken Donaldson
Journal:  Part Fibre Toxicol       Date:  2013-10-25       Impact factor: 9.400

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.