Literature DB >> 21654622

A simple and efficient method to isolate macrophages from mixed primary cultures of adult liver cells.

Hiroshi Kitani1, Takato Takenouchi, Mitsuru Sato, Miyako Yoshioka, Noriko Yamanaka.   

Abstract

Kupffer cells are liver-specific resident macrophages and play an important role in the physiological and pathological functions of the liver. Although the isolation methods of liver macrophages have been well-described, most of these methods require sophisticated equipment, such as a centrifugal elutriator and technical skills. Here, we provide a novel method to obtain liver macrophages in sufficient number and purity from mixed primary cultures of adult rat liver cells, as schematically illustrated in Figure 1. After dissociation of the liver cells by two-step perfusion method, a fraction mostly composed of parenchymal hepatocytes is prepared and seeded into T75 tissue culture flasks with culture medium composed of DMEM and 10% FCS. Parenchymal hepatocytes lose the epithelial cell morphology within a few days in culture, degenerate or transform into fibroblast-like cells (Figure 2). As the culture proceeds, around day 6, phase contrast-bright, round macrophage-like cells start to proliferate on the fibroblastic cell sheet (Figure 2). The growth of the macrophage-like cells continue and reach to maximum levels around day 12, covering the cell sheet on the flask surface. By shaking of the culture flasks, macrophages are readily suspended into the culture medium. Subsequent transfer and short incubation in plastic dishes result in selective adhesion of macrophages (Figure 3), where as other contaminating cells remain suspended. After several rinses with PBS, attached macrophages are harvested. More than 10(6) cells can be harvested repeatedly from the same T75 tissue culture flask at two to three day intervals for more than two weeks (Figure 3). The purities of the isolated macrophages were 95 to 99%, as evaluated by flow cytometry or immunocytochemistry with rat macrophage-specific antibodies (Figure 4). The isolated cells show active phagocytosis of polystylene beads (Figure 5), proliferative response to recombinant GM-CSF, secretion of inflammatory/anti-inflammatory cytokines upon stimulation with LPS, and formation of multinucleated giant cells. In conclusion, we provide a simple and efficient method to obtain liver macrophages in sufficient number and purity without complex equipment and skills. This method might be applicable to other mammalian species.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21654622      PMCID: PMC3197125          DOI: 10.3791/2757

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis Exp        ISSN: 1940-087X            Impact factor:   1.355


Anesthetize an adult male Sprague-Dawley rat (at 10 to 15 weeks-old; body weight 150-200 g) by an intraperitoneal injection of a sodium pentobarbital solution (50 mg sodium pentobarbital / kg body weight). Place the animal in a stainless pan and spray 70% ethanol onto its abdomen and thorax. Make a small cut and peel off the skin. Open the abdomen by the cut with a pair of scissors. Confirm the location of portal vein, pass a surgical thread under the portal vein and loosely clump. Clump the distal part of the inferior vena cava and mesenteric vein to prevent blood reflux into the liver. Open the thoracic cavity by cutting the diaphragm with scissors, and expose the heart. Insert a plastic catheter (2 mm diameter) into the portal vein and tighten the thread firmly around the catheter. Connect the catheter to a perfusion system which is loaded with washing solution (Ca2+-Mg2+free HBSS containing 0.5 mM EGTA, 10 mM HEPES and 4.2 mM NaHCO3 ; pH 7.2) prewarmed at 37 °C. Begin perfusion in situ at a rate of 10 ml/min. At the same time, make a cut in right atrium wall. Continue perfusion for 10 min. Switch the perfusion solution to collagenase solution [HBSS containing 10mM HEPES and 4.2mM NaHCO3 supplemented with Type I collagenase (0.05%) and trypsin inhibitor (50 μg/ml); pH 7.5], and perfuse for 10 - 20 min at a rate of 10 ml/min until the liver slightly swells and shows the sign for disintegration of the liver structure under serous membrane. Remove and carefully transfer the liver into a sterile beaker containing 25 ml of collagenase solution. Mince into small pieces by scissors. Add 75 ml of cold MEM into the resultant cell suspension. After gentle pipetting, filtrate through a cell strainer (100 μm)to remove connective tissues and undigested tissue fragments. Transfer the filtrate into 50 ml conical tubes and centrifuge at 50 x g for 1 min at 4°C (brake off). Carefully discard the supernatant. Resuspend the pellet with cold MEM. Repeat 2.4) three times. Suspend the cells obtained in 2.5) in the growth medium composed of DMEM containing 10% heat inactivated FCS, supplemented with 100 μM β-mercaptoethanol, 10 μg/ml insulin, 100 μg/ml streptomycin and 100 U/ml penicillin, and seed into five to ten tissue culture flasks (surface area: 75 cm2) at a density of 6.7 x 104 cells / cm2 (5 x 106 cells / flask / 12 -15 ml of medium). Incubate the culture flasksat 37°C in an atmosphere of 5% CO2- 95% air. Replace the growth medium every 2 to 3 days intervals. After 12 days of culture, macrophages proliferate on the cell sheet. These cells are suspended by reciprocal shaking of the culture flasks at 80 - 120 strokes per minute for 30 min at 37 °C. Transfer the culture medium into 100 mm non-tissue culture grade plastic dishes. Pool the medium from two T75 flasks into one plastic dish. Refill culture flasks with the growth medium and return them to the incubator. Incubate plastic dishes for 30 min at 37 °C in an atmosphere of 5% CO2- 95% air. Macrophages readily attach to non-tissue culture grade plastic dishes under this incubation process, whereas other contaminating cells do not. Aspirate the medium and gently rinse the plastic dish with PBS. Repeat this step three times. Add 1 ml of TrypLE Express solution into the dish, and incubate for 10min at 37 °C in an atmosphere of 5% CO2- 95% air. Add 9 ml of the growth medium. Gently scrape off the attached macrophages by a cell scraper. Transfer the cell suspension into a 15 ml conical tube and centrifuge at 180 x g for 5 min at 25°C (brake on). Discard the supernatant and add 1 ml of the growth medium. Dissociate into single cells by vigorous pipetting. Enumerate the cell number by a hemocytometer-counting. Isolation steps can be repeated with the same culture flasks at two to three day intervals for more than two weeks. Isolated macrophages can be cultured in the growth medium described in 3.1.

Protocol

5. Representative Results

An example of a mixed primary culture of adult rat liver cells is shown in Figure 2. Parenchymal hepatocytes lose the epithelial cell morphology within a few days in culture, degenerate or transform into fibroblast-like cells. Then, around day 6 to 12, phase contrast-bright, round macrophage-like cells vigourouly proliferate on the fibroblastic cell sheet. By shaking of the culture flasks, macrophages are readily suspended into the culture medium, and subsequent transfer and incubation in plastic dishes result in selective adhesion of macrophages(Figure 3). The macrophage-like cells can be harvested as early as day 8, and the numbers reached maximal levels on days 12 to 14. More than 106 cells can be harvested from a T75 culture flask repeatedly at 2 to 3 day intervals for more than two weeks, enabling a total cell yield per flask of 107 per T75 culture flask (Figure 3). The purities of the isolated macrophages were 95 to 99%, as evaluated by flowcytometry or immunocytochemistry with rat macrophage-specific antibodies,such as ED-1 (Figure 4), ED-3, OX-41 (Figure 4) and Iba19.The isolated cells show typical characteristics of macrophages, such as active phagocytosis of polystylene beads (Figure 5), proliferative response to recombinant GM-CSF, secretion of inflammatory/anti-inflammatory cytokines upon stimulation with LPS, and formation of multinucleated giant cells9. Figure 1. A scheme for selective isolation and purification of macrophage-like cells from mixed primary culture of rat liver cells. Figure 2. Primary culture of rat liver cells and proliferation of macrophage-like cells. Arrow indicates a multinuclear giant cell. Scale bar = 100 μm. Reprinted from the Journal of Immunological Methods, Vol.360, 47-55 (2010) 9 with permission from Elsevier. Figure 3. Selective isolation of macrophage-like cells by the shaking and attachment method. Cells were suspended into the culture medium by shaking the flasks, subsequently transferred into non-tissue culture grade plastic dishes, and incubated at 37 °C. As early as 10 min after plating, macrophage-like cells attached to the dish surface, while other contaminating fibroblastic cells remained suspended. After rinsing with PBS, a highly purified macrophage population was obtained. These cells gained typical macrophage morphology after 40 min of culture, and mitotic cells were frequently observed (arrows). Subsequent changes in cell numbers recovered from flasks at different culture periods are shown. Values are an average±SD from three to five flasks. Experiments were repeated three times and data are indicated by different symbols. Scale bar =100 μm. Reprinted from the Journal of Immunological Methods, Vol.360, 47-55 (2010)9 with permission from Elsevier. Figure 4. Immunocytochemical staining of macrophage-like cells with monoclonal antibodies against rat macrophages. Figure 5. Phagocytosis of FITC-labeled microbeads by macrophage-like cells.

Discussion

Here, we report a simple and efficient method to obtain macrophages from the mixed primary cultures of adult rat liver cells. Our method relies first on the novel proliferative activity of macrophages in the mixed culture of rat liver cells, and then subsequent isolation and purification of these cells on the basis of their biological characteristics as macrophages9. It may be possible the macrophages proliferated in the mixed primary culture of adult liver cells might have originated from Kupffer or related cells that contaminated into the parenchymal hepatocytes fraction. The macrophages might have responded to specific environmental changes caused by transformation of parenchymal hepatocyte10 and other fibroblastic cells in the mixed primary cultures. In conclusion, our method provides isolation of macrophage-like cells in sufficient number and purity from the primary culture of rat liver cellswithout using sophisticated equipment and technical skills. In addition, the isolation procedure can be repeated with the same culture flask for more than two weeks. This method might be applicable to other mammalian species.

Disclosures

All animals were kept and operated in the animal facility in the National Institute of Animal Health, according to the guidelines and regulations set forth by the Institution's Committee for animal experiments.
  10 in total

1.  A novel isolation method for macrophage-like cells from mixed primary cultures of adult rat liver cells.

Authors:  Hiroshi Kitani; Takato Takenouchi; Mitsuru Sato; Miyako Yoshioka; Noriko Yamanaka
Journal:  J Immunol Methods       Date:  2010-06-17       Impact factor: 2.303

Review 2.  Preparation of isolated rat liver cells.

Authors:  P O Seglen
Journal:  Methods Cell Biol       Date:  1976       Impact factor: 1.441

3.  Liver fibrosis: the hepatocyte revisited.

Authors:  Mark D Gorrell
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 17.425

Review 4.  Liver: An organ with predominant innate immunity.

Authors:  Bin Gao; Won-Il Jeong; Zhigang Tian
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 17.425

Review 5.  The liver as a lymphoid organ.

Authors:  Ian Nicholas Crispe
Journal:  Annu Rev Immunol       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 28.527

6.  Isolation and primary culture of rat Kupffer cells.

Authors:  J K Olynyk; S L Clarke
Journal:  J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 4.029

7.  Purification of murine Kupffer cells by centrifugal elutriation.

Authors:  J Janousek; E Strmen; F Gervais
Journal:  J Immunol Methods       Date:  1993-08-26       Impact factor: 2.303

Review 8.  Role of the Kupffer cell in mediating hepatic toxicity and carcinogenesis.

Authors:  Ruth A Roberts; Patricia E Ganey; Cynthia Ju; Lisa M Kamendulis; Ivan Rusyn; James E Klaunig
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2006-11-22       Impact factor: 4.849

9.  Primary culture and expression of cytokine mRNAs by lipopolysaccharide in bovine Kupffer cells.

Authors:  M Yoshioka; Y Nakajima; T Ito; O Mikami; S Tanaka; S Miyazaki; Y Motoi
Journal:  Vet Immunol Immunopathol       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 2.046

10.  Isolation of rat and human Kupffer cells by a modified enzymatic assay.

Authors:  G Heuff; S Meyer; R H Beelen
Journal:  J Immunol Methods       Date:  1994-09-14       Impact factor: 2.303

  10 in total
  10 in total

1.  Differential transmission of HIV traversing fetal oral/intestinal epithelia and adult oral epithelia.

Authors:  Sharof M Tugizov; Rossana Herrera; Piri Veluppillai; Deborah Greenspan; Vanessa Soros; Warner C Greene; Jay A Levy; Joel M Palefsky
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2011-12-28       Impact factor: 5.103

2.  Exposure to human immunodeficiency virus/hepatitis C virus in hepatic and stellate cell lines reveals cooperative profibrotic transcriptional activation between viruses and cell types.

Authors:  Shadi Salloum; Jacinta A Holmes; Rohit Jindal; Shyam S Bale; Cynthia Brisac; Nadia Alatrakchi; Anna Lidofsky; Annie J Kruger; Dahlene N Fusco; Jay Luther; Esperance A Schaefer; Wenyu Lin; Martin L Yarmush; Raymond T Chung
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2016-10-05       Impact factor: 17.425

3.  Antagonism of RNase L Is Required for Murine Coronavirus Replication in Kupffer Cells and Liver Sinusoidal Endothelial Cells but Not in Hepatocytes.

Authors:  Yize Li; Susan R Weiss
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2016-10-14       Impact factor: 5.103

4.  Establishment of c-myc-immortalized Kupffer cell line from a C57BL/6 mouse strain.

Authors:  Hiroshi Kitani; Chisato Sakuma; Takato Takenouchi; Mitsuru Sato; Miyako Yoshioka; Noriko Yamanaka
Journal:  Results Immunol       Date:  2014-08-23

5.  Altered Gut Microbiota Composition and Immune Response in Experimental Steatohepatitis Mouse Models.

Authors:  Mitsuaki Ishioka; Kouichi Miura; Shinichiro Minami; Yoichiro Shimura; Hirohide Ohnishi
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2016-12-02       Impact factor: 3.199

6.  Silencing lncRNA TUG1 Alleviates LPS-Induced Mouse Hepatocyte Inflammation by Targeting miR-140/TNF.

Authors:  Qing-Min Liu; Li-Li Liu; Xi-Dong Li; Ping Tian; Hao Xu; Zeng-Lian Li; Li-Kun Wang
Journal:  Front Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2021-02-11

7.  Source-Related Effects of Wastewater on Transcription Factor (AhR, CAR and PXR)-Mediated Induction of Gene Expression in Cultured Rat Hepatocytes and Their Association with the Prevalence of Antimicrobial-Resistant Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Keerthi S Guruge; Noriko Yamanaka; Miyuki Sonobe; Wataru Fujizono; Miyako Yoshioka; Masato Akiba; Takehisa Yamamoto; Derrick I Joshua; Keshava Balakrishna; Nobuyoshi Yamashita; Kurunthachalam Kannan; Toshiyuki Tsutsui
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-09-18       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  A new method to isolate and culture rat kupffer cells.

Authors:  Wei-qun Zeng; Ji-qin Zhang; Yue Li; Kang Yang; Yu-pei Chen; Zuo-jin Liu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-08-14       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Characterization of the liver-macrophages isolated from a mixed primary culture of neonatal swine hepatocytes.

Authors:  Hiroshi Kitani; Miyako Yoshioka; Takato Takenouchi; Mitsuru Sato; Noriko Yamanaka
Journal:  Results Immunol       Date:  2014-01-23

10.  Dietary advanced glycation end-products aggravate non-alcoholic fatty liver disease.

Authors:  Christopher Leung; Chandana B Herath; Zhiyuan Jia; Sof Andrikopoulos; Bronwyn E Brown; Michael J Davies; Leni R Rivera; John B Furness; Josephine M Forbes; Peter W Angus
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-09-21       Impact factor: 5.742

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.