Literature DB >> 21654453

Minimum 5-year radiographic results of long scoliosis fusion in juvenile spinal muscular atrophy patients: major curve progression after instrumented fusion.

Lukas P Zebala1, Keith H Bridwell, Christine Baldus, Stephens B Richards, John P Dormans, Lawrence G Lenke, Joshua D Auerbach, John Lovejoy.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Previous studies reported on spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) scoliosis surgery outcomes without focus on major curve progression (MCP). The purpose of this study was to assess minimum 5-year radiographic outcomes, MCP, and factors for MCP after spinal surgery in juvenile SMA patients with open triradiate cartilage at the time of surgery.
METHODS: Retrospective review of radiographic and clinical data of 22 SMA patients treated surgically at 3 institutions over 20 years was performed. Major curve Cobb angle, apical vertebral translation, pelvic obliquity, coronal balance, and sagittal Cobb angles (T5-T12 and T12-sacrum) were measured at preoperative, initial, and ultimate follow-up. MCP was defined as an increase in Cobb angle of ≥ 10 degrees between initial and ultimate follow-up.
RESULTS: Overall, SMA patients had significant improvement in radiographic measurements at follow-up. Eight patients (36%) developed MCP and were similar in age (7.8 vs. 8.8 y, P=0.09) to non-MCP patients. Initial major curve Cobb angle correction was greater for MCP patients than for non-MCP patients (19 vs. 36 degrees, P=0.004). MCP patients lost 26 degrees (P=0.001) and non-MCP patients lost 2 degrees of major curve Cobb angle correction during follow-up. Both groups had similar ultimate follow-up radiographic outcomes and remained improved from preoperative deformity. All 14 non-MCP patients had long posterior instrumentation (T4 or higher to sacrum/pelvis), whereas all 4 patients with short posterior instrumentation developed MCP. Six patients underwent anterior-posterior spinal fusion (ASF-PSF) and had greater preoperative deformity than PSF-only patients, but ultimate major curve Cobb angle (38 vs. 44 degrees, P=0.4) was similar for both the groups. Two ASF-PSF patients developed MCP.
CONCLUSIONS: Overall, SMA patients maintained scoliosis correction with nonpedicle screw-based (predominantly Luque-Galveston instrumentation) long spinal instrumentation at minimum 5-year follow-up. MCP >10 degrees developed in 36%, contrary to our expectation of 100% in these young juvenile SMA patients. All non-MCP patients had instrumentation from the upper thoracic spine (T1 to T4) to the sacrum, whereas all 4 patients with short instrumentation developed MCP. MCP and non-MCP patients had similar ultimate correction and remained improved from preoperative deformity. Skeletal immaturity and length of posterior instrumentation may influence MCP in SMA scoliosis surgery and should be considered during preoperative planning. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Case Series; Level IV.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21654453     DOI: 10.1097/BPO.0b013e318220ba33

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop        ISSN: 0271-6798            Impact factor:   2.324


  7 in total

1.  Radiographic and Respiratory Effects of Growing Rods in Children With Spinal Muscular Atrophy.

Authors:  Rachel L Lenhart; Sylvester Youlo; Mary K Schroth; Kenneth J Noonan; James McCarthy; David Mann; Scott Hetzel; Sarah A Sund; Matthew A Halanski
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 2.324

2.  Understanding Respiratory Restrictions as a Function of the Scoliotic Spinal Curve in Thoracic Insufficiency Syndrome: A 4D Dynamic MR Imaging Study.

Authors:  Jayaram K Udupa; Yubing Tong; Anthony Capraro; Joseph M McDonough; Oscar H Mayer; Suzanne Ho; Paul Wileyto; Drew A Torigian; Robert M Campbell
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop       Date:  2018-09-20       Impact factor: 2.324

3.  Understanding Respiratory Restrictions as a Function of the Scoliotic Spinal Curve in Thoracic Insufficiency Syndrome: A 4D Dynamic MR Imaging Study.

Authors:  Jayaram K Udupa; Yubing Tong; Anthony Capraro; Joseph M McDonough; Oscar H Mayer; Suzanne Ho; Paul Wileyto; Drew A Torigian; Robert M Campbell
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 4.  Proximal spinal muscular atrophy: current orthopedic perspective.

Authors:  Gerrit Haaker; Albert Fujak
Journal:  Appl Clin Genet       Date:  2013-11-14

5.  Natural course of scoliosis in proximal spinal muscular atrophy type II and IIIa: descriptive clinical study with retrospective data collection of 126 patients.

Authors:  Albert Fujak; Wolfgang Raab; Alexander Schuh; Silvia Richter; Raimund Forst; Jürgen Forst
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2013-10-04       Impact factor: 2.362

6.  Magnetically Controlled Devices Parallel to the Spine in Children with Spinal Muscular Atrophy.

Authors:  Heiko M Lorenz; Batoul Badwan; Marina M Hecker; Konstantinos Tsaknakis; Katharina Groenefeld; Lena Braunschweig; Anna K Hell
Journal:  JB JS Open Access       Date:  2017-11-28

7.  Predictors for Deformity Progression in a Spinal Muscular Atrophy Cohort After Scoliosis Correction Surgery.

Authors:  Po-Chih Shen; Cheng-Chang Lu; Wen-Chen Liang; Yin-Chun Tien; Yuh-Jyh Jong; Yen-Mou Lu; Zi-Miao Liu; Chia-Lung Shih; Shih-Hsiang Chou
Journal:  Clin Spine Surg       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 1.723

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.