OBJECTIVE: To clarify the associations of nonpermanent employment with poor health in longitudinal setting with different health outcomes. METHODS: A population cohort (n = 1071) was surveyed at the age of 30 and then again at the age of 42. They were classified according to exposure to nonpermanent employment. The outcomes included indicators of mental and somatic health and health behavior. RESULTS: When adjusted for baseline level of the outcome under study, the odds ratio of the heavily exposed was 1.90 (1.25 to 2.88) for nervous symptoms, 1.77 (1.03 to 2.05) for psychological distress, and 1.52 (1.03 to 2.25) for suboptimal mood. Among the lightly exposed, the odds ratio for psychological distress was 1.94 (1.10 to 2.10). CONCLUSIONS: Psychological distress is particularly sensitive to exposure to nonpermanent employment. The effects on somatic health or health behavior should be studied only with carefully specified hypotheses.
OBJECTIVE: To clarify the associations of nonpermanent employment with poor health in longitudinal setting with different health outcomes. METHODS: A population cohort (n = 1071) was surveyed at the age of 30 and then again at the age of 42. They were classified according to exposure to nonpermanent employment. The outcomes included indicators of mental and somatic health and health behavior. RESULTS: When adjusted for baseline level of the outcome under study, the odds ratio of the heavily exposed was 1.90 (1.25 to 2.88) for nervous symptoms, 1.77 (1.03 to 2.05) for psychological distress, and 1.52 (1.03 to 2.25) for suboptimal mood. Among the lightly exposed, the odds ratio for psychological distress was 1.94 (1.10 to 2.10). CONCLUSIONS: Psychological distress is particularly sensitive to exposure to nonpermanent employment. The effects on somatic health or health behavior should be studied only with carefully specified hypotheses.
Authors: Valerio Ghezzi; Tahira M Probst; Laura Petitta; Valeria Ciampa; Matteo Ronchetti; Cristina Di Tecco; Sergio Iavicoli; Claudio Barbaranelli Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-05-21 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Ellenor Mittendorfer-Rutz; Gunnel Hensing; Hugo Westerlund; Magnus Backheden; Anne Hammarström Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2013-01-26 Impact factor: 3.295