BACKGROUND: Elevated levels of D-dimer, a marker for the systemic activation of the clotting and fibrinolysis, are frequently observed in patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE) and malignancy. We examined the prognostic significance of baseline plasma D-dimer levels for predicting survival in sarcoma. METHODS: The study comprised of 45 patients receiving first-line chemotherapy for inoperable, high-risk for relapse, or metastatic disease. Plasma D-dimer levels was measured before chemotherapy. Univariate and multivariate analysis were performed for association between plasma D-dimer levels and baseline clinical characteristics in predicting survival. RESULTS: D-dimer levels were elevated to ≥500 ng/mL in 53% (24 of 45 patients). Six of 45 patients (13%) developed VTE. The Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that the median survival for patients with VTE, metastatic disease, progression on chemotherapy, or D-dimer ≥500 ng/mL was shorter (log-rank test, P=0.012, 0.001, 0.034, and 0.015, respectively). The mortality rate for patients with D-dimer ≥500 ng/mL was higher (P<0.0001) than those with <500 ng/ml for both metastatic (100% vs. 62.5%) and nonmetastatic (58% vs. 31%) groups [median follow-up; 60 mo (range, 9 to 106 mo)]. Using stepwise proportional hazard model, D-dimer levels and metastasis status were independent significant predictors for survival [hazard ratios (95% confidence intervals), 4.24 (1.88-9.60), and 3.28 (1.42-7.58), respectively]. CONCLUSIONS: Elevated D-dimer levels have independent significant prognostic value for survival in sarcoma patients with both metastatic and nonmetastatic disease and may help identify high-risk patients for treatment decisions.
BACKGROUND: Elevated levels of D-dimer, a marker for the systemic activation of the clotting and fibrinolysis, are frequently observed in patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE) and malignancy. We examined the prognostic significance of baseline plasma D-dimer levels for predicting survival in sarcoma. METHODS: The study comprised of 45 patients receiving first-line chemotherapy for inoperable, high-risk for relapse, or metastatic disease. Plasma D-dimer levels was measured before chemotherapy. Univariate and multivariate analysis were performed for association between plasma D-dimer levels and baseline clinical characteristics in predicting survival. RESULTS: D-dimer levels were elevated to ≥500 ng/mL in 53% (24 of 45 patients). Six of 45 patients (13%) developed VTE. The Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that the median survival for patients with VTE, metastatic disease, progression on chemotherapy, or D-dimer ≥500 ng/mL was shorter (log-rank test, P=0.012, 0.001, 0.034, and 0.015, respectively). The mortality rate for patients with D-dimer ≥500 ng/mL was higher (P<0.0001) than those with <500 ng/ml for both metastatic (100% vs. 62.5%) and nonmetastatic (58% vs. 31%) groups [median follow-up; 60 mo (range, 9 to 106 mo)]. Using stepwise proportional hazard model, D-dimer levels and metastasis status were independent significant predictors for survival [hazard ratios (95% confidence intervals), 4.24 (1.88-9.60), and 3.28 (1.42-7.58), respectively]. CONCLUSIONS: Elevated D-dimer levels have independent significant prognostic value for survival in sarcomapatients with both metastatic and nonmetastatic disease and may help identify high-risk patients for treatment decisions.
Authors: Saroj Vadhan-Raj; Mairéad G McNamara; Marino Venerito; Hanno Riess; Eileen M O'Reilly; Michael J Overman; Xiao Zhou; Ujjwala Vijapurkar; Simrati Kaul; Peter Wildgoose; Alok A Khorana Journal: Cancer Med Date: 2020-07-14 Impact factor: 4.452
Authors: Michaela Kripnerová; Hamendra Singh Parmar; Jiří Šána; Alena Kopková; Lenka Radová; Sieghart Sopper; Krzysztof Biernacki; Jan Jedlička; Michaela Kohoutová; Jitka Kuncová; Jan Peychl; Emil Rudolf; Miroslav Červinka; Zbyněk Houdek; Pavel Dvořák; Kateřina Houfková; Martin Pešta; Zdeněk Tůma; Martina Dolejšová; Filip Tichánek; Václav Babuška; Martin Leba; Ondřej Slabý; Jiří Hatina Journal: J Clin Med Date: 2021-05-25 Impact factor: 4.241
Authors: Edyta Wolny-Rokicka; Katarzyna Brzeźniakiewicz-Janus; Jerzy Wydmański; Andrzej Tukiendorf; Agnieszka Zembroń-Łacny Journal: J Int Med Res Date: 2018-03-19 Impact factor: 1.671