Literature DB >> 21654303

Laparoscopic versus conventional palliative resection for incurable, symptomatic stage IV colorectal cancer: impact on short-term results.

Tomonori Akagi1, Masafumi Inomata, Tsuyoshi Etoh, Kazuhiro Yasuda, Norio Shiraishi, Seigo Kitano.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Issues surroundings the safety and efficacy of palliative laparoscopic resections for patients with stage IV colorectal cancer have not been explicitly examined in the literature. We describe our experience with laparoscopic procedures for patients with stage IV incurable symptomatic colorectal cancer and compare perioperative outcomes with a contemporaneous group of patients who underwent conventional open procedures.
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed data from laparoscopic resections performed in patients for symptomatic stage IV colorectal cancer between 1999 and 2009. Data regarding patient demographics, perioperative morbidity and mortality, intraoperative blood loss, operative time, length of postoperative hospital stay, and time from surgery to chemotherapy were assessed.
RESULTS: A total of 29 patients were identified and of these patients, 11 (38%) underwent palliative laparoscopic resections and 18 (62%) underwent conventional open resection for stage IV colorectal cancer. In comparing laparoscopic to conventional procedures, the length of postoperative hospital stay in the laparoscopic resection group was significantly shorter than that in the open resection group (median, 17 vs. 20 d, P<0.05). Significant differences were present between the 2 groups when following features were compared: leukocyte on day 1 (median, 7.87 vs. 8.70 × 10/L) and day 3 (median, 6.40 vs. 7.80 × 10/L), albumin level on day 7 (median, 38.0 vs. 29.8 g/L), and C-reactive protein level on day 7 (median, 0.6 vs. 2.8 mg/dL). There were no significance differences between the 2 groups in intraoperative blood loss (median, 105 vs. 155 mL), operative time (median, 271.5 vs. 187.5 min), time to intake of solid food (median, 4 vs. 4 d), the rate of postoperative complications, perioperative mortality, or a duration from surgery to chemotherapy (median, 22 vs. 28 d).
CONCLUSIONS: Palliative laparoscopic resection is a safe and feasible option with acceptable morbidity and mortality in patients with stage IV colorectal cancer. Importantly, in this group of difficult-to-treat patients, our results compare favorably with those from previously published reports on open procedures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21654303     DOI: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e31821db75e

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech        ISSN: 1530-4515            Impact factor:   1.719


  8 in total

1.  Multicenter study of short- and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic palliative resection for incurable, symptomatic stage IV colorectal cancer in Japan.

Authors:  Tomonori Akagi; Masafumi Inomata; Seigo Kitano; Koya Hida; Yoshiharu Sakai; Suguru Hasegawa; Yousuke Kinjo; Kenichi Yoshimura; Masaaki Ito; Yosuke Fukunaga; Akiyoshi Kanazawa; Hitoshi Idani; Masahiko Watanabe
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2013-02-22       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Clinical outcomes of laparoscopic versus open surgery for primary tumor resection in patients with stage IV colorectal cancer with unresectable metastasis.

Authors:  Jong Wan Kim; Ji Won Park; Sung Chan Park; Sun Young Kim; Ji Yeon Baek; Jae Hwan Oh
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2014-11-13       Impact factor: 2.549

3.  Factors related to short-term outcomes and delayed systemic treatment following primary tumor resection for asymptomatic stage IV colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Tetsuro Tominaga; Takashi Nonaka; Toshio Shiraisi; Kiyoaki Hamada; Keisuke Noda; Hiroaki Takeshita; Keizaburo Maruyama; Hidetoshi Fukuoka; Hideo Wada; Shintaro Hashimoto; Terumitsu Sawai; Takeshi Nagayasu
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2020-02-26       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 4.  Clinical safety and outcomes of laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for palliative resection of primary tumors in patients with stage IV colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Min-Wei Zhou; Xiao-Dong Gu; Jian-Bin Xiang; Zong-You Chen
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-08-18       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Comparison of the feasibility of laparoscopic resection of the primary tumor in patients with stage IV colon cancer with early and advanced disease: the short- and long-term outcomes at a single institution.

Authors:  Jui-Ho Wang; Tai-Ming King; Min-Chi Chang; Chao-Wen Hsu
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2012-11-03       Impact factor: 2.549

Review 6.  Palliative care and end-stage colorectal cancer management: the surgeon meets the oncologist.

Authors:  Renato Costi; Francesco Leonardi; Daniele Zanoni; Vincenzo Violi; Luigi Roncoroni
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-06-28       Impact factor: 5.742

7.  Efficacy and safety of ultrasound-guided continuous hyperthermic intraperitoneal perfusion chemotherapy for the treatment of malignant ascites: a midterm study of 36 patients.

Authors:  Yinbing Wu; Mingxin Pan; Shuzhong Cui; Mingchen Ba; Zulong Chen; Qiang Ruan
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2016-01-20       Impact factor: 4.147

8.  Differences in clinical features between laparoscopy and open resection for primary tumor in patients with stage IV colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Ik Yong Kim; Bo Ra Kim; Hyun Soo Kim; Young Wan Kim
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2015-11-19       Impact factor: 4.147

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.