Literature DB >> 21653868

Subcortical mechanisms of feature-based attention.

Keith A Schneider1.   

Abstract

The degree to which spatial and feature-based attention are governed by similar control mechanisms is not clear. To explore this issue, I measured, during conditions of spatial or feature-based attention, activity in the human subcortical visual nuclei, which have precise retinotopic maps and are known to play important roles in the regulation of spatial attention but have limited selectivity of nonspatial features. Subjects attended to and detected changes in separate fields of moving or colored dots. When the fields were disjoint, spatially attending to one field enhanced hemodynamic responses in the superior colliculus (SC), lateral geniculate nucleus (LGN), and two retinotopic pulvinar nuclei. When the two dot fields were spatially overlapping, feature-based attention to the moving versus colored dots enhanced responses in the pulvinar nuclei and the majority of the LGN, including the magnocellular layers, and suppressed activity in some areas within the parvocellular layers; the SC was inconsistently modulated among subjects. The results demonstrate that feature-based attention operates throughout the visual system by prioritizing neurons encoding the attended information, including broadly tuned thalamic neurons. I conclude that spatial and feature-based attention operate via a common principle, but that spatial location is a special feature in that it is widely encoded in the brain, is used for overt orienting, and uses a specialized structure, the SC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21653868      PMCID: PMC6623343          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.6274-10.2011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  15 in total

1.  Similar effects of feature-based attention on motion perception and pursuit eye movements at different levels of awareness.

Authors:  Miriam Spering; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-05-30       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Striatal and thalamic GABA level concentrations play differential roles for the modulation of response selection processes by proprioceptive information.

Authors:  Shalmali Dharmadhikari; Ruoyun Ma; Chien-Lin Yeh; Ann-Kathrin Stock; Sandy Snyder; S Elizabeth Zauber; Ulrike Dydak; Christian Beste
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2015-06-30       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Attentional Modulation of Neuronal Activity Depends on Neuronal Feature Selectivity.

Authors:  Jacqueline R Hembrook-Short; Vanessa L Mock; Farran Briggs
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2017-06-22       Impact factor: 10.834

4.  Scalp-recorded N40 visual evoked potential: Sensory and attentional properties.

Authors:  Alice Mado Proverbio; Veronica Broido; Francesco De Benedetto; Alberto Zani
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2021-09-27       Impact factor: 3.698

5.  Functional mapping of the magnocellular and parvocellular subdivisions of human LGN.

Authors:  Rachel N Denison; An T Vu; Essa Yacoub; David A Feinberg; Michael A Silver
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2014-07-17       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  Aligning one's sights: The pulvinar provides context for visual information processing.

Authors:  Sara J Aton
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2021-06-16       Impact factor: 18.688

7.  Short-term plasticity in the human visual thalamus.

Authors:  Jan W Kurzawski; Claudia Lunghi; Laura Biagi; Michela Tosetti; Maria Concetta Morrone; Paola Binda
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2022-04-06       Impact factor: 8.713

8.  Modulation of the Primary Auditory Thalamus When Recognizing Speech with Background Noise.

Authors:  Paul Glad Mihai; Nadja Tschentscher; Katharina von Kriegstein
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2021-07-09       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Attention gates visual coding in the human pulvinar.

Authors:  Jason Fischer; David Whitney
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 14.919

10.  The Anatomical and Functional Organization of the Human Visual Pulvinar.

Authors:  Michael J Arcaro; Mark A Pinsk; Sabine Kastner
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-07-08       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.