Literature DB >> 21653863

The projective field of a retinal amacrine cell.

Saskia E J de Vries1, Stephen A Baccus, Markus Meister.   

Abstract

In sensory systems, neurons are generally characterized by their receptive field, namely the sensitivity to activity patterns at the input of the circuit. To assess the role of the neuron in the system, one must also know its projective field, namely the spatiotemporal effects the neuron exerts on all of the outputs of the circuit. We studied both the receptive and projective fields of an amacrine interneuron in the salamander retina. This amacrine type has a sustained OFF response with a small receptive field, but its output projects over a much larger region. Unlike other amacrine cells, this type is remarkably promiscuous and affects nearly every ganglion cell within reach of its dendrites. Its activity modulates the sensitivity of visual responses in ganglion cells but leaves their kinetics unchanged. The projective field displays a center-surround structure: depolarizing a single amacrine suppresses the visual sensitivity of ganglion cells nearby and enhances it at greater distances. This change in sign is seen even within the receptive field of one ganglion cell; thus, the modulation occurs presynaptically on bipolar cell terminals, most likely via GABA(B) receptors. Such an antagonistic projective field could contribute to the mechanisms of the retina for predictive coding.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21653863      PMCID: PMC3130123          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5662-10.2011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  44 in total

1.  Anticipation of moving stimuli by the retina.

Authors:  M J Berry; I H Brivanlou; T A Jordan; M Meister
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1999-03-25       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Lateral inhibition in the inner retina is important for spatial tuning of ganglion cells.

Authors:  P B Cook; J S McReynolds
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 24.884

3.  Spatiotemporal patterns at the retinal output.

Authors:  A L Jacobs; F S Werblin
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  A comparison of receptive-field and tracer-coupling size of amacrine and ganglion cells in the rabbit retina.

Authors:  S A Bloomfield; D Xin
Journal:  Vis Neurosci       Date:  1997 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.241

5.  Response to change is facilitated by a three-neuron disinhibitory pathway in the tiger salamander retina.

Authors:  B Roska; E Nemeth; F S Werblin
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1998-05-01       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  The light response of retinal ganglion cells is truncated by a displaced amacrine circuit.

Authors:  S Nirenberg; M Meister
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 17.173

7.  Responses of ganglion cells to contrast steps in the light-adapted retina of the tiger salamander.

Authors:  D A Burkhardt; P K Fahey; M Sikora
Journal:  Vis Neurosci       Date:  1998 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.241

8.  Serial inhibitory synapses in retina.

Authors:  J Zhang; C S Jung; M M Slaughter
Journal:  Vis Neurosci       Date:  1997 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.241

9.  TTX attenuates surround inhibition in rabbit retinal ganglion cells.

Authors:  W R Taylor
Journal:  Vis Neurosci       Date:  1999 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.241

10.  Temporal contrast enhancement via GABAC feedback at bipolar terminals in the tiger salamander retina.

Authors:  C J Dong; F S Werblin
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 2.714

View more
  14 in total

1.  Disinhibitory gating of retinal output by transmission from an amacrine cell.

Authors:  Mihai Manu; Stephen A Baccus
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-10-26       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Morphology and connectivity of the small bistratified A8 amacrine cell in the mouse retina.

Authors:  Sammy C S Lee; Arndt Meyer; Timm Schubert; Laura Hüser; Karin Dedek; Silke Haverkamp
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  2015-03-10       Impact factor: 3.215

Review 3.  Retinal connectomics: towards complete, accurate networks.

Authors:  Robert E Marc; Bryan W Jones; Carl B Watt; James R Anderson; Crystal Sigulinsky; Scott Lauritzen
Journal:  Prog Retin Eye Res       Date:  2013-09-07       Impact factor: 21.198

4.  Nonlinear spatial integration in the receptive field surround of retinal ganglion cells.

Authors:  Daisuke Takeshita; Tim Gollisch
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-05-28       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Adaptation of Inhibition Mediates Retinal Sensitization.

Authors:  David B Kastner; Yusuf Ozuysal; Georgia Panagiotakos; Stephen A Baccus
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 10.834

6.  Spatial segregation of adaptation and predictive sensitization in retinal ganglion cells.

Authors:  David B Kastner; Stephen A Baccus
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2013-08-07       Impact factor: 17.173

Review 7.  Receptor targets of amacrine cells.

Authors:  Chi Zhang; Maureen A McCall
Journal:  Vis Neurosci       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 3.241

Review 8.  What the salamander eye has been telling the vision scientist's brain.

Authors:  Fernando Rozenblit; Tim Gollisch
Journal:  Semin Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2020-04-29       Impact factor: 7.727

9.  Inner retinal inhibition shapes the receptive field of retinal ganglion cells in primate.

Authors:  D A Protti; S Di Marco; J Y Huang; C R Vonhoff; V Nguyen; S G Solomon
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2013-09-16       Impact factor: 5.182

10.  Selectivity to approaching motion in retinal inputs to the dorsal visual pathway.

Authors:  Todd R Appleby; Michael B Manookin
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-02-24       Impact factor: 8.140

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.