Literature DB >> 21652527

Novel genetic selection system for quantitative trait loci of quality protein maize.

Yongrui Wu1, Joachim Messing.   

Abstract

Quality protein maize combines a high-lysine trait with kernel hardness, for which a new, simpler genetic selection was designed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21652527      PMCID: PMC3176102          DOI: 10.1534/genetics.111.131078

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


CORN seeds are used as food for humans and as feed for livestock. However, essential amino acids like lysine and tryptophan are deficient because of the abundance of major storage proteins, called zeins. As a consequence, in countries where corn is consumed as the primary or sole protein source, malnutrition is common (O). In those countries, demand for high-lysine corn is on the rise. Actually, high-lysine corn has been reported in which the transcriptional activator of the 22-kDa α-zein gene Opaque 2 (O2) is mutated (S) and non-zein proteins are proportionally increased, resulting in twice the lysine content than in normal maize (M, 1965). However, this o2 mutant has several drawbacks, such as reduced grain yield, soft chalky endosperm, greater susceptibility to pests and diseases, and higher moisture content at harvest time, which precluded its direct commercialization. Fortunately, there are quantitative trait loci, referred to as o2 modifiers (Mo2s), that convert soft into hard endosperm without loosing the high lysine trait; this combination is called quality protein maize (QPM) (V). Interestingly, transcript and protein of 27-kDa γ-zein accumulate two- to threefold higher in QPM than in normal inbreds and in unmodified o2 mutants (G; H), and silencing 27- and 16-kDa γ-zein genes resulted in clumping of protein bodies and opacity of QPM seeds, demonstrating hypostasis of γ-zeins over o2 modifiers (W). QPM has been introduced to many developing countries in South America, Africa, and Asia (P). However, conversion of QPM into local germplasm is a lengthy process that discourages the spread of the benefits of QPM because breeders have to monitor a high-lysine level, the recessive o2 mutant allele, and the Mo2s. Here, we present a simpler and accelerated QPM selection. Instead of using the recessive o2 mutation, we use an RNA interference (RNAi) construct directed against both 22- and 19-kDa zeins, but linked to the visible green fluorescent protein (GFP) marker gene. Indeed, when such a green and nonvitreous phenotype was crossed with QPM lines, the Mo2s produced a vitreous green kernel, demonstrating that high lysine and kernel hardness can be selected in a dominant fashion.

Visible Marker for α-Zein Reduction

The transgenic high-lysine corn was reported to be generated by endosperm-specific silencing of lysine catabolism (H) or accumulation of α-zeins with RNAi (S; H), with the latter showing a similar phenotype to o2 mutant. We therefore chose inverted repeats of members of each α-zein class to assemble a double RNAi construct. However, if Mo2s restore vitreousness of the kernel, we could not use the opaque phenotype of the RNAi construct for selection. Therefore, we placed a chimeric GFP gene under the control of the cauliflower mosaic virus 35S promoter, immediately upstream of the double RNAi cassette, resulting in pTF102-P6z1RNAi (abbreviated as P6z1RNAi) (Figure 1A). The hybrid of B73 × Mo17 was pollinated with T0 transgenic pollen to produce T1 seeds for genetic analysis. Six normal and “green” immature kernels were sorted and zein proteins were extracted. Indeed, the 22- and 19-kDa α-zeins were dramatically reduced in the six green kernels compared to the six normal kernels (Figure 1B). At maturity, the vitreous and nongreen kernels were 216, while the opaque and green kernels were 222, exhibiting a ratio of 1:1 segregation (Figure 1C).
F

Silencing of the 22- and 19-kDa α-zeins linked with the GFP marker. (A) pTF102-P6z1RNAi construct structure. The Zp22/6 gene was used for the 22-kDa and z1A2 gene for the 19-kDa inverted repeat (S, 2003). The binary vector pTF102 was used for all intermediate construct building and Agrobacterium-mediated transformation (F). (B) SDS-PAGE analysis of zein accumulation in progeny from (B73 × Mo17) × P6z1RNAi/+. Six normal and “green” kernels at 18 days after pollination (DAP) were selected with a fluorescence dissection microscope (Leica MZ16 F) for zein extraction. Total zein loaded in each lane was equal to 500 mg of fresh endosperm at 18 DAP. Protein markers (M) from top to bottom are 37, 25, 20, 15, and 10 kDa. (C) Segregation of vitreous and opaque kernels scored with a light box.

Silencing of the 22- and 19-kDa α-zeins linked with the GFP marker. (A) pTF102-P6z1RNAi construct structure. The Zp22/6 gene was used for the 22-kDa and z1A2 gene for the 19-kDa inverted repeat (S, 2003). The binary vector pTF102 was used for all intermediate construct building and Agrobacterium-mediated transformation (F). (B) SDS-PAGE analysis of zein accumulation in progeny from (B73 × Mo17) × P6z1RNAi/+. Six normal and “green” kernels at 18 days after pollination (DAP) were selected with a fluorescence dissection microscope (Leica MZ16 F) for zein extraction. Total zein loaded in each lane was equal to 500 mg of fresh endosperm at 18 DAP. Protein markers (M) from top to bottom are 37, 25, 20, 15, and 10 kDa. (C) Segregation of vitreous and opaque kernels scored with a light box.

Dominance of Mo2s

A hybrid of B73 × Mo17 with P6z1RNAi was used to pollinate the QPM lines pool 41 and 42. While half of the kernels from (B73 × Mo17) × P6z1RNAi/+ were opaque, most progeny from pool 41 × P6z1RNAi/+ and pool 42 × P6z1RNAi/+ had a vitreous phenotype (Figure 2A) because the Mo2s overcame the action of the RNAi, which was monitored with GFP (Figure 2B). Control kernels of B73 × Mo17 were vitreous and nonfluorescent. As expected, the green and vitreous seeds from pool 42 × P6z1RNAi/+ with reduced accumulation of α-zeins at maturity (Figure 2C) contained an increased lysine level of >25% over a control (Table 1), exceeding the 18.5% achieved previously with RNAi against the 22-kDa zeins only (S).
F

Modification of RNAi mutant with Mo2s. (A) Ear phenotypes. The opaque and vitreous kernels from the cross of (B73 × Mo17) × P6z1RNAi/+ (Top) showed a ratio of 1:1 segregation. Two representative kernels with opaque and vitreous phenotypes are indicated by arrow and arrowhead, respectively; Most progeny from pool 42 × P6z1RNAi/+ (Middle) and pool 41 × P6z1RNAi/+ (Bottom) showed the vitreous phenotype. (B) Kernels were truncated for observation under a fluorescence dissection microscope (Top) and natural light (Bottom) in each panel. (Top) B73 × Mo17 control. (Middle) Green and opaque kernels from (B73 × Mo17) × P6z1RNAi/+. (Bottom) Green and vitreous kernels from pool 42 × P6z1RNAi/+. (C) α-Zein accumulation pattern in mature seeds. Lanes 1–3, B73 × Mo17; lanes 4–6, green and opaque kernels from (B73 × Mo17) × P6z1RNAi/+; lanes 7–9, green and vitreous kernels from pool 42 × P6z1RNAi/+. Protein markers (M) from top to bottom are 25, 20, and 15 kDa.

TABLE 1

Amino acid composition analysis in ground cornmeal

Amino acidaB73 × Mo17 (%)Pool 42 × P6z1RNAi/+ (%)
Lysine0.300.38
Phenylalanine0.730.48
Leucine2.010.71
Isoleucine0.410.27
Threonine0.360.32
Valine0.440.40
Histidine0.350.29
Arginine0.550.49
Glycine0.430.40
Aspartic Acid0.630.79
Serine0.560.37
Glutamic Acid2.681.56
Proline1.610.85
Hydroxyproline0.040.03
Alanine0.880.55
Tyrosine0.590.31
Total ground kernels (g)25.2825.77

Samples were ground cornmeal of bulked mature kernels from B73 × Mo17 and mature green and vitreous kernels from pool 42 × P6z1RNAi/+.

Amino acid levels were expressed as the percentage of total cornmeal.

Modification of RNAi mutant with Mo2s. (A) Ear phenotypes. The opaque and vitreous kernels from the cross of (B73 × Mo17) × P6z1RNAi/+ (Top) showed a ratio of 1:1 segregation. Two representative kernels with opaque and vitreous phenotypes are indicated by arrow and arrowhead, respectively; Most progeny from pool 42 × P6z1RNAi/+ (Middle) and pool 41 × P6z1RNAi/+ (Bottom) showed the vitreous phenotype. (B) Kernels were truncated for observation under a fluorescence dissection microscope (Top) and natural light (Bottom) in each panel. (Top) B73 × Mo17 control. (Middle) Green and opaque kernels from (B73 × Mo17) × P6z1RNAi/+. (Bottom) Green and vitreous kernels from pool 42 × P6z1RNAi/+. (C) α-Zein accumulation pattern in mature seeds. Lanes 1–3, B73 × Mo17; lanes 4–6, green and opaque kernels from (B73 × Mo17) × P6z1RNAi/+; lanes 7–9, green and vitreous kernels from pool 42 × P6z1RNAi/+. Protein markers (M) from top to bottom are 25, 20, and 15 kDa. Amino acid composition analysis in ground cornmeal Samples were ground cornmeal of bulked mature kernels from B73 × Mo17 and mature green and vitreous kernels from pool 42 × P6z1RNAi/+. Amino acid levels were expressed as the percentage of total cornmeal.

QPM Conversion

There are two main steps in conversion of QPM into local germplasm wild type (LG+) by traditional means. First, one crosses LG+ with the o2 mutant and then backcrosses with LG+ for five generations and self-crosses for three generations to obtain a homozygous LG o2 mutant (LGo2). Because the o2 allele is recessive, one cannot use the opaque phenotype as a selective marker during backcrosses and has to follow the allele by selfing or with a molecular marker. After introgression of o2, the LGo2 is used to pollinate a QPM donor line. The resultant progeny are backcrossed again with LGo2 for five generations and then self-crossed for at least three generations to obtain a modified LG o2 mutant (LGMo2) (Figure 3). This lengthy and laborious method would take at least 5 years and 8 months. In contrast, the QPM-RNAi (Figure 2B) can be directly pollinated with LG+, simply selecting green and vitreous progeny, which can easily be followed during recurring backcrosses with LG+. After five backcross generations, resultant progeny are self-crossed for three generations to generate LG(RNAi)-QPM. During the entire process, green and vitreous kernels are selected in each generation, which could save 2 years and 8 months (Figure 3). Even if one would like to create LG without any transgene by replacing it with the o2 mutation, introgression of Mo2s would still be faster. The P6z1RNAi transgene could be segregated and the o2 allele introduced. By crossing QPM-RNAi/+−BC5(Mo2s/+; RNAi/+; +/+) and o2/+−BC5 (+/+; +/+; o2/+), half of the green and vitreous kernels should carry the o2 allele, which could be screened by the specific o2 allele markers; then the vitreous and green progeny with genotype Mo2s/+; RNAi/+; o2/+ are selected and self-crossed for three generations to generate LGMo2 without the P6z1RNAi transgene, still saving >2 years.
F

Comparison of traditional and accelerated methods for QPM conversion. LG+, local germplasm wild type; LGo2, LG o2 mutant; Mo2s, o2 modifiers; LGMo2, modified LGo2 or LG-QPM; and LG(RNAi)-QPM, modified LG with P6z1RNAi transgene;

Comparison of traditional and accelerated methods for QPM conversion. LG+, local germplasm wild type; LGo2, LG o2 mutant; Mo2s, o2 modifiers; LGMo2, modified LGo2 or LG-QPM; and LG(RNAi)-QPM, modified LG with P6z1RNAi transgene;

Conclusion

The dominance of Mo2s over an RNAi phenotype has been used to accelerate backcrossing a multigenic trait into maize cultivars for enhanced nutrition.
  12 in total

1.  Contiguous genomic DNA sequence comprising the 19-kD zein gene family from maize.

Authors:  Rentao Song; Joachim Messing
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 8.340

2.  High lysine and high tryptophan transgenic maize resulting from the reduction of both 19- and 22-kD alpha-zeins.

Authors:  Shihshieh Huang; Alessandra Frizzi; Cheryl A Florida; Diane E Kruger; Michael H Luethy
Journal:  Plant Mol Biol       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 4.076

3.  Gamma-zeins are essential for endosperm modification in quality protein maize.

Authors:  Yongrui Wu; David R Holding; Joachim Messing
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-07-06       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated transformation of maize embryos using a standard binary vector system.

Authors:  Bronwyn R Frame; Huixia Shou; Rachel K Chikwamba; Zhanyuan Zhang; Chengbin Xiang; Tina M Fonger; Sue Ellen K Pegg; Baochun Li; Dan S Nettleton; Deqing Pei; Kan Wang
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 8.340

5.  MUTANT GENE THAT CHANGES PROTEIN COMPOSITION AND INCREASES LYSINE CONTENT OF MAIZE ENDOSPERM.

Authors:  E T MERTZ; L S BATES; O E NELSON
Journal:  Science       Date:  1964-07-17       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Gene expression of a gene family in maize based on noncollinear haplotypes.

Authors:  Rentao Song; Joachim Messing
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-07-09       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  A new opaque variant of maize by a single dominant RNA-interference-inducing transgene.

Authors:  Gregorio Segal; Rentao Song; Joachim Messing
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Genetic analysis of opaque2 modifier loci in quality protein maize.

Authors:  David R Holding; Brenda G Hunter; Taijoon Chung; Bryan C Gibbon; Clark F Ford; Arvind K Bharti; Joachim Messing; Bruce R Hamaker; Brian A Larkins
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2008-04-22       Impact factor: 5.699

9.  High-lysine corn generated by endosperm-specific suppression of lysine catabolism using RNAi.

Authors:  Nancy M Houmard; Jonnelle L Mainville; Christopher P Bonin; Shihshieh Huang; Michael H Luethy; Thomas M Malvar
Journal:  Plant Biotechnol J       Date:  2007-06-06       Impact factor: 9.803

10.  Growth of Rats Fed on Opaque-2 Maize.

Authors:  E T Mertz; O A Veron; L S Bates; O E Nelson
Journal:  Science       Date:  1965-06-25       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  13 in total

1.  Intra-Kernel Reallocation of Proteins in Maize Depends on VP1-Mediated Scutellum Development and Nutrient Assimilation.

Authors:  Xixi Zheng; Qi Li; Changsheng Li; Dong An; Qiao Xiao; Wenqin Wang; Yongrui Wu
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2019-09-17       Impact factor: 11.277

2.  Maize endosperm-specific transcription factors O2 and PBF network the regulation of protein and starch synthesis.

Authors:  Zhiyong Zhang; Xixi Zheng; Jun Yang; Joachim Messing; Yongrui Wu
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-09-12       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Nonredundant function of zeins and their correct stoichiometric ratio drive protein body formation in maize endosperm.

Authors:  Xiaomei Guo; Lingling Yuan; Han Chen; Shirley J Sato; Thomas E Clemente; David R Holding
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2013-05-15       Impact factor: 8.340

4.  Quality Protein Maize Based on Reducing Sulfur in Leaf Cells.

Authors:  Jose Planta; Joachim Messing
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2017-10-20       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Maize Oxalyl-CoA Decarboxylase1 Degrades Oxalate and Affects the Seed Metabolome and Nutritional Quality.

Authors:  Jun Yang; Miaomiao Fu; Chen Ji; Yongcai Huang; Yongrui Wu
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2018-09-10       Impact factor: 11.277

6.  Balancing of sulfur storage in maize seed.

Authors:  Yongrui Wu; Wenqin Wang; Joachim Messing
Journal:  BMC Plant Biol       Date:  2012-05-30       Impact factor: 4.215

7.  RNA interference can rebalance the nitrogen sink of maize seeds without losing hard endosperm.

Authors:  Yongrui Wu; Joachim Messing
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-02-29       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  Proteome balancing of the maize seed for higher nutritional value.

Authors:  Yongrui Wu; Joachim Messing
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2014-05-30       Impact factor: 5.753

Review 9.  Recent advances in the study of prolamin storage protein organization and function.

Authors:  David R Holding
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2014-06-20       Impact factor: 5.753

10.  Seed-Specific Expression of the Arabidopsis AtMAP18 Gene Increases both Lysine and Total Protein Content in Maize.

Authors:  Yujie Chang; Erli Shen; Liuying Wen; Jingjuan Yu; Dengyun Zhu; Qian Zhao
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-11-18       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.