Literature DB >> 21652339

Morphological variation in Sarracenia purpurea (Sarraceniaceae): geographic, environmental, and taxonomic correlates.

Aaron M Ellison1, Hannah L Buckley, Thomas E Miller, Nicholas J Gotelli.   

Abstract

Geographic variation in morphology reflects phenotypic responses to environmental gradients and evolutionary history of populations and species and may indicate local or regional changes in environmental conditions. The pitcher plant (Sarracenia purpurea) illustrates these principles. At local scales, its morphology reflects nutrient availability. At points along its broad geographic range (from Florida to northern Canada) morphology has been used to distinguish subspecies and varieties, but there has been no detailed study of the continuum of morphological variation across this entire range. Patterns of morphological variation in S. purpurea were characterized as a function of climatic and environmental conditions at 39 sites spanning its range. Differences in pitcher size and shape were strongly correlated with temperature, annual precipitation, and availability of ammonium and calcium in peat pore water. Pitcher shape (lip width, mouth diameter, and pitcher width) in Florida panhandle populations differed significantly from pitcher shape of all other populations, even after accounting for environmental correlations. In contrast, the northern and southern subspecies of S. purpurea (the latter exclusive of the Florida panhandle populations) cannot be distinguished based on these morphological measurements alone. These results support a recent proposal that identifies the Florida populations as a distinct species, Sarracenia rosea.

Entities:  

Year:  2004        PMID: 21652339     DOI: 10.3732/ajb.91.11.1930

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Bot        ISSN: 0002-9122            Impact factor:   3.844


  8 in total

1.  Development and characterization of microsatellite markers in Sarracenia L. (pitcher plant) species.

Authors:  Willie L Rogers; Jennifer M Cruse-Sanders; Ron Determann; Russell L Malmberg
Journal:  Conserv Genet Resour       Date:  2010-12-01       Impact factor: 0.973

2.  In vitro characterization of a nineteenth-century therapy for smallpox.

Authors:  William Arndt; Chandra Mitnik; Karen L Denzler; Stacy White; Robert Waters; Bertram L Jacobs; Yvan Rochon; Victoria A Olson; Inger K Damon; Jeffrey O Langland
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-03-09       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Food-web models predict species abundances in response to habitat change.

Authors:  Nicholas J Gotelli; Aaron M Ellison
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 8.029

4.  Mutualists or parasites? Context-dependent influence of symbiotic fly larvae on carnivorous investment in the Albany pitcher plant.

Authors:  Samuel J Lymbery; Raphael K Didham; Stephen D Hopper; Leigh W Simmons
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2016-11-23       Impact factor: 2.963

5.  Effects of depth on reef fish communities: Insights of a "deep refuge hypothesis" from Southwestern Atlantic reefs.

Authors:  Pedro Henrique Cipresso Pereira; Cláudio Henrique Macedo; José de Anchieta C C Nunes; Laura Fernandes de Barros Marangoni; Adalto Bianchini
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-09-26       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Morphological variation in Cynodon dactylon (L.) Pers., and its relationship with the environment along a longitudinal gradient.

Authors:  Miaoli Wang; Jingxue Zhang; Zhipeng Guo; Yongzhuo Guan; Gen Qu; Jianyu Liu; Yuxia Guo; Xuebing Yan
Journal:  Hereditas       Date:  2020-02-12       Impact factor: 3.271

7.  Bacterial Recruitment to Carnivorous Pitcher Plant Communities: Identifying Sources Influencing Plant Microbiome Composition and Function.

Authors:  Jacob J Grothjan; Erica B Young
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-03-14       Impact factor: 5.640

8.  Subspecific Differentiation Events of Montane Stag Beetles (Coleoptera, Lucanidae) Endemic to Formosa Island.

Authors:  Cheng-Lung Tsai; Wen-Bin Yeh
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-06-03       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.