Literature DB >> 21652058

Does human papillomavirus infection imply a different prognosis in vulvar squamous cell carcinoma?

Immaculada Alonso1, Victoria Fusté, Marta del Pino, Paola Castillo, Aureli Torné, Pere Fusté, Jose Rios, Jaume Pahisa, Juan Balasch, Jaume Ordi.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Two independent pathways in the development of vulvar squamous cell carcinoma (VSCC) have been described, one related to and the other independent of high-risk human papillomavirus (HR-HPV). The aim of our study was to evaluate whether the HPV status has a prognostic significance or can predict response to radiotherapy.
METHODS: All VSCC diagnosed from 1995 to 2009 were retrospectively evaluated (n=98). HPV infection was detected by amplification of HPV DNA by PCR using SPF-10 primers and typed by the INNO-LIPA HPV research assay. p16(INK4a) expression was determined by immunohistochemistry. Disease-free and overall survival (DFS and OS) were estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis with the log-rank test and a multivariate Cox proportional hazard's model.
RESULTS: HR-HPV DNA was detected in 19.4% of patients. HPV16 was the most prevalent genotype (73.7% of cases). p16(INK4a) stained 100% HPV-positive and 1.3% HPV-negative tumors (p<.001). No differences were found between HPV-positive and -negative tumors in terms of either DFS (39.8% vs. 49.8% at 5 years; p=.831), or OS (67.2% vs. 71.4% at 5 years; p=.791). No differences in survival were observed between HPV-positive and -negative patients requiring radiotherapy (hazard ratio [HR] 1.04, 95% confidence interval [CI] .45 to 2.41). FIGO stages III-IV (p=.002), lymph node metastasis (p=.030), size ≥ 20 mm (p=.023), invasion depth (p=.020) and ulceration (p=.032) were associated with increased mortality but in multivariated only lymph node metastasis retained the association (HR 13.28, 95% CI 1.19 to 148.61).
CONCLUSIONS: HPV-positive and -negative VSCCs have a similar prognosis. Radiotherapy does not increase survival in HPV-positive women.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21652058     DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2011.05.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gynecol Oncol        ISSN: 0090-8258            Impact factor:   5.482


  19 in total

1.  CD274 (PD-L1), CDKN2A (p16), TP53, and EGFR immunohistochemical profile in primary, recurrent and metastatic vulvar cancer.

Authors:  Sofia Lérias; Susana Esteves; Fernanda Silva; Mário Cunha; Daniela Cochicho; Luís Martins; Ana Félix
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2019-12-16       Impact factor: 7.842

2.  Biological relevance of human papillomaviruses in vulvar cancer.

Authors:  Gordana Halec; Laia Alemany; Beatriz Quiros; Omar Clavero; Daniela Höfler; Maria Alejo; Wim Quint; Michael Pawlita; Francesc X Bosch; Silvia de Sanjose
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2017-01-06       Impact factor: 7.842

3.  Tumor proteomics by multivariate analysis on individual pathway data for characterization of vulvar cancer phenotypes.

Authors:  Annsofi Sandberg; Gunnel Lindell; Brita Nordström Källström; Rui Mamede Branca; Kristina Gemzell Danielsson; Mats Dahlberg; Barbro Larson; Jenny Forshed; Janne Lehtiö
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2012-04-12       Impact factor: 5.911

4.  Molecular landscape of vulvovaginal squamous cell carcinoma: new insights into molecular mechanisms of HPV-associated and HPV-independent squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Abeer M Salama; Amir Momeni-Boroujeni; Chad Vanderbilt; Marc Ladanyi; Robert Soslow
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2021-10-14       Impact factor: 8.209

5.  A clinical and pathological overview of vulvar condyloma acuminatum, intraepithelial neoplasia, and squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Boris Léonard; Frederic Kridelka; Katty Delbecque; Frederic Goffin; Stéphanie Demoulin; Jean Doyen; Philippe Delvenne
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-02-25       Impact factor: 3.411

6.  Treatment outcomes of curative radiotherapy in patients with vulvar cancer: results of the retrospective KROG 1203 study.

Authors:  Youngkyong Kim; Joo-Young Kim; Ja Young Kim; Nam Kwon Lee; Jin Hee Kim; Yong Bae Kim; Young Seok Kim; Juree Kim; Yeon-Sil Kim; Dae Sik Yang; Yeon-Joo Kim
Journal:  Radiat Oncol J       Date:  2015-09-30

7.  The overexpression of p16 is not a surrogate marker for high-risk human papilloma virus genotypes and predicts clinical outcomes for vulvar cancer.

Authors:  Jacek J Sznurkowski; Anton Żawrocki; Wojciech Biernat
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2016-07-13       Impact factor: 4.430

8.  Investigation of prognostic significance of CD109 expression in women with vulvar squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Pelin Özün Ozbay; Tekin Ekinci; Seyran Yiǧit; Ali Yavuzcan; Selda Uysal; Ferit Soylu; Fulya Cakalagaoglu
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2013-06-07       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 9.  Laboratory and clinical aspects of human papillomavirus testing.

Authors:  Paul K S Chan; María Alejandra Picconi; Tak Hong Cheung; Lucia Giovannelli; Jong Sup Park
Journal:  Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci       Date:  2012 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 6.250

10.  Prognostic Value of Overexpressed p16INK4a in Vulvar Cancer: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Hanyu Cao; Si Wang; Zhenyu Zhang; Jiangyan Lou
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-31       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.