Literature DB >> 21651041

Benefits and limitations of porous substrates as biosensors for protein adsorption.

Thomas D Lazzara1, Ingo Mey, Claudia Steinem, Andreas Janshoff.   

Abstract

Porous substrates have gained widespread interest for biosensor applications based on molecular recognition. Thus, there is a great demand to systematically investigate the parameters that limit the transport of molecules toward and within the porous matrix as a function of pore geometry. Finite element simulations (FES) and time-resolved optical waveguide spectroscopy (OWS) experiments were used to systematically study the transport of molecules and their binding on the inner surface of a porous material. OWS allowed us to measure the kinetics of protein adsorption within porous anodic aluminum oxide membranes composed of parallel-aligned, cylindrical pores with pore radii of 10-40 nm and pore depths of 0.8-9.6 μm. FES showed that protein adsorption on the inner surface of a porous matrix is almost exclusively governed by the flux into the pores. The pore-interior surface nearly acts as a perfect sink for the macromolecules. Neither diffusion within the pores nor adsorption on the surface are rate limiting steps, except for very low rate constants of adsorption. While adsorption on the pore walls is mainly governed by the stationary flux into the pores, desorption from the inner pore walls involves the rate constants of desorption and adsorption, essentially representing the protein-surface interaction potential. FES captured the essential features of the OWS experiments such as the initial linear slopes of the adsorption kinetics, which are inversely proportional to the pore depth and linearly proportional to protein concentration. We show that protein adsorption kinetics allows for an accurate determination of protein concentration, while desorption kinetics could be used to capture the interaction potential of the macromolecules with the pore walls.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21651041     DOI: 10.1021/ac200725y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anal Chem        ISSN: 0003-2700            Impact factor:   6.986


  10 in total

1.  Application of advanced sampling and analysis methods to predict the structure of adsorbed protein on a material surface.

Authors:  Tigran M Abramyan; David L Hyde-Volpe; Steven J Stuart; Robert A Latour
Journal:  Biointerphases       Date:  2017-05-17       Impact factor: 2.456

Review 2.  Protein adsorption onto nanomaterials for the development of biosensors and analytical devices: a review.

Authors:  Samir A Bhakta; Elizabeth Evans; Tomás E Benavidez; Carlos D Garcia
Journal:  Anal Chim Acta       Date:  2014-10-29       Impact factor: 6.558

3.  Biomolecule kinetics measurements in flow cell integrated porous silicon waveguides.

Authors:  Xing Wei; Jeremy W Mares; Yandong Gao; Deyu Li; Sharon M Weiss
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2012-07-31       Impact factor: 3.732

Review 4.  Waveguide-mode sensors as aptasensors.

Authors:  Subash C B Gopinath; Koichi Awazu; Makoto Fujimaki
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2012-02-15       Impact factor: 3.576

5.  Functionalized anodic aluminum oxide membrane-electrode system for enzyme immobilization.

Authors:  Zhiqiang Chen; Jianjun Zhang; Shanteri Singh; Pauline Peltier-Pain; Jon S Thorson; Bruce J Hinds
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2014-08-26       Impact factor: 15.881

Review 6.  Micro- and Nanotopography Sensitive Bacterial Attachment Mechanisms: A Review.

Authors:  Yifan Cheng; Guoping Feng; Carmen I Moraru
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2019-02-21       Impact factor: 5.640

Review 7.  Advances in Optical Biosensors and Sensors Using Nanoporous Anodic Alumina.

Authors:  Mahmoud Amouzadeh Tabrizi; Josep Ferre-Borrull; Lluis F Marsal
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-09-07       Impact factor: 3.576

8.  Icariin controlled release on a silk fibroin/mesoporous bioactive glass nanoparticles scaffold for promoting stem cell osteogenic differentiation.

Authors:  Xiaofeng Shen; Pengfei Yu; Hua Chen; Jiangping Wang; Binjie Lu; Xuefeng Cai; Chun Gu; Guoqiang Liang; Donglin Hao; Qihan Ma; Yuwei Li
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2020-03-25       Impact factor: 4.036

9.  Comparative Kinetic Analysis of Closed-Ended and Open-Ended Porous Sensors.

Authors:  Yiliang Zhao; Girija Gaur; Raymond L Mernaugh; Paul E Laibinis; Sharon M Weiss
Journal:  Nanoscale Res Lett       Date:  2016-09-13       Impact factor: 4.703

10.  Mass Transfer Limitations of Porous Silicon-Based Biosensors for Protein Detection.

Authors:  Sofia Arshavsky Graham; Evgeniy Boyko; Rachel Salama; Ester Segal
Journal:  ACS Sens       Date:  2020-09-21       Impact factor: 7.711

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.