Literature DB >> 21650197

Polarizable water networks in ligand-metalloprotein recognition. Impact on the relative complexation energies of Zn-dependent phosphomannose isomerase with D-mannose 6-phosphate surrogates.

Nohad Gresh1, Benoit de Courcy, Jean-Philip Piquemal, Johanna Foret, Stéphanie Courtiol-Legourd, Laurent Salmon.   

Abstract

Using polarizable molecular mechanics, a recent study [de Courcy et al. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2010, 132, 3312] has compared the relative energy balances of five competing inhibitors of the FAK kinase. It showed that the inclusion of structural water molecules was indispensable for an ordering consistent with the experimental one. This approach is now extended to compare the binding affinities of four active site ligands to the Type I Zn-metalloenzyme phosphomannose isomerase (PMI) from Candida albicans. The first three ones are the PMI substrate β-D-mannopyranose 6-phosphate (β-M6P) and two isomers, α-D-mannopyranose 6-phosphate (α-M6P) and β-D-glucopyranose 6-phosphate (β-G6P). They have a dianionic 6-phosphate substituent and differ by the relative configuration of the two carbon atoms C1 and C2 of the pyranose ring. The fourth ligand, namely 6-deoxy-6-dicarboxymethyl-β-D-mannopyranose (β-6DCM), is a substrate analogue that has the β-M6P phosphate replaced by the nonhydrolyzable phosphate surrogate malonate. In the energy-minimized structures of all four complexes, one of the ligand hydroxyl groups binds Zn(II) through a water molecule, and the dianionic moiety binds simultaneously to Arg304 and Lys310 at the entrance of the cavity. Comparative energy-balances were performed in which solvation of the complexes and desolvation of PMI and of the ligands are computed using the Langlet-Claverie continuum reaction field procedure. They resulted into a more favorable balance in favor of β-M6P than α-M6P and β-G6P, consistent with the experimental results that show β-M6P to act as a PMI substrate, while α-M6P and β-G6P are inactive or at best weak inhibitors. However, these energy balances indicated the malonate ligand β-6DCM to have a much lesser favorable relative complexation energy than the substrate β-M6P, while it has an experimental 10-fold higher affinity than it on Type I PMI from Saccharomyces cerevisiae. The energy calculations were validated by comparison with parallel ab initio quantum chemistry on model binding sites extracted from the energy-minimized PMI-inhibitor complexes. We sought to improve the models upon including explicit water molecules solvating the dianionic moieties in their ionic bonds with the Arg304 and Lys310 side-chains. Energy-minimization resulted in the formation of three networks of structured waters. The first water of each network binds to one of the three accessible anionic oxygens. The networks extend to PMI residues (Asp17, Glu48, Asp300) remote from the ligand binding site. The final comparative energy balances also took into account ligand desolvation in a box of 64 waters. They now resulted into a large preference in favor of β-6DCM over β-M6P. The means to further augment the present model upon including entropy effects and sampling were discussed. Nevertheless a clear-cut conclusion emerging from this as well as our previous study on FAK kinase is that both polarization and charge-transfer contributions are critical elements of the energy balances.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21650197     DOI: 10.1021/jp2024654

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Phys Chem B        ISSN: 1520-5207            Impact factor:   2.991


  10 in total

1.  Conformational analysis of a polyconjugated protein-binding ligand by joint quantum chemistry and polarizable molecular mechanics. Addressing the issues of anisotropy, conjugation, polarization, and multipole transferability.

Authors:  Elodie Goldwaser; Benoit de Courcy; Luc Demange; Christiane Garbay; Françoise Raynaud; Reda Hadj-Slimane; Jean-Philip Piquemal; Nohad Gresh
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2014-11-01       Impact factor: 1.810

2.  DFT and docking studies of rhodostreptomycins A and B and their interactions with solvated/nonsolvated Mg²⁺ and Ca²⁺ ions.

Authors:  Christiaan Jardínez; Ines Nicolás-Vázquez; Julian Cruz-Borbolla; Cesar A González-Ramírez; Miguel Cepeda; Jose Correa-Basurto; Thangarasu Pandiyan; Rene Miranda
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2013-09-13       Impact factor: 1.810

Review 3.  Metal Ion Modeling Using Classical Mechanics.

Authors:  Pengfei Li; Kenneth M Merz
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2017-01-03       Impact factor: 60.622

4.  Force Fields for Small Molecules.

Authors:  Fang-Yu Lin; Alexander D MacKerell
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2019

5.  Modeling Structural Coordination and Ligand Binding in Zinc Proteins with a Polarizable Potential.

Authors:  Jiajing Zhang; Wei Yang; Jean-Philip Piquemal; Pengyu Ren
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2012-01-02       Impact factor: 6.006

6.  Taking into Account the Ion-induced Dipole Interaction in the Nonbonded Model of Ions.

Authors:  Pengfei Li; Kenneth M Merz
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2014-01-14       Impact factor: 6.006

7.  The Polarizable Atomic Multipole-based AMOEBA Force Field for Proteins.

Authors:  Yue Shi; Zhen Xia; Jiajing Zhang; Robert Best; Chuanjie Wu; Jay W Ponder; Pengyu Ren
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 6.006

8.  Phosphatase-inert glucosamine 6-phosphate mimics serve as actuators of the glmS riboswitch.

Authors:  Xiang Fei; Thomas Holmes; Julianna Diddle; Lauren Hintz; Dan Delaney; Alex Stock; Danielle Renner; Molly McDevitt; David B Berkowitz; Juliane K Soukup
Journal:  ACS Chem Biol       Date:  2014-10-27       Impact factor: 5.100

9.  Automatically Constructed Neural Network Potentials for Molecular Dynamics Simulation of Zinc Proteins.

Authors:  Mingyuan Xu; Tong Zhu; John Z H Zhang
Journal:  Front Chem       Date:  2021-06-18       Impact factor: 5.221

10.  Interfacial Water Many-Body Effects Drive Structural Dynamics and Allosteric Interactions in SARS-CoV-2 Main Protease Dimerization Interface.

Authors:  Dina El Ahdab; Louis Lagardère; Théo Jaffrelot Inizan; Fréderic Célerse; Chengwen Liu; Olivier Adjoua; Luc-Henri Jolly; Nohad Gresh; Zeina Hobaika; Pengyu Ren; Richard G Maroun; Jean-Philip Piquemal
Journal:  J Phys Chem Lett       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 6.475

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.